bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

zhou, m.

Publications and source records attributed to zhou, m..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

DNA sliding and loop formation by E. coli SMC complex: MukBEF

SMC (structural maintenance of chromosomes) complexes share conserved architectures and function in chromosome maintenance via an unknown mechanism. Here we have used single-molecule techniques to study MukBEF, the SMC complex in Escherichia coli. Real-time movies show MukB alone can compact DNA and ATP inhibits DNA compaction by MukB. We observed that DNA unidirectionally slides through MukB, potentially by a ratchet mechanism, and the sliding speed depends on the elastic energy stored in the DNA. MukE, MukF and ATP binding stabilize MukB and DNA interaction, and ATP hydrolysis regulates the loading/unloading of MukBEF from DNA. Our data suggests a new model for how MukBEF organizes the bacterial chromosome in vivo; and this model will be relevant for other SMC proteins.

biophysics

Competitive binding of MatP and topoisomerase IV to the MukB dimerization hinge

SMC complexes have ubiquitous roles in chromosome organisation. In Escherichia coli, the interplay between the SMC complex, MukBEF, and matS-bound MatP in the replication termination region, ter, results in depletion of MukBEF from ter, thus promoting chromosome individualisation by directing replichores to separate cell halves. MukBEF also interacts with topoisomerase IV ParC2E2 heterotetramers, to direct its chromosomal distribution to mirror that of MukBEF, thereby facilitating coordination between chromosome organisation and decatenation by topoisomerase IV. Here we demonstrate that the MukB dimerization hinge binds ParC and MatP with the same dimer to dimer stoichiometry. MatP and ParC have an overlapping binding interface on the MukB hinge, leading to their mutually exclusive binding. Furthermore, the MukB hinge fails to stably associate with matS-bound MatP, while MatP mutants deficient in matS binding are impaired in MukB hinge binding, demonstrating that mats competes with the hinge for MatP binding. Cells expressing MukBEF complexes containing a mutation in the MukB hinge interface for ParC/MatP binding are deficient in ParC binding in vivo, despite having a Muk+ topoisomerase IV+ phenotype. This mutant protein is also impaired in MatP binding in vitro, and cells expressing this variant exhibit a MukBEF cellular localisation consistent with impaired MatP binding.

biochemistry