Biology subjects

von Heimendahl, M.

Publications and source records attributed to von Heimendahl, M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Too little and too much: medial prefrontal functional inhibition impairs early acquisition of operant reversal learning, whereas medial prefrontal disinhibition impairs established serial-reversal performance in rats

Schizophrenia is associated with reduced activation ( hypofrontality) and neural disinhibition (reduced GABAergic inhibition) in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), as well as reversal learning deficits. Whilst reversal learning has been strongly linked to the orbitofrontal cortex, its dependence on the primate dlPFC - and its rodent analogue, the medial PFC (mPFC) - is less clear. Nevertheless, we hypothesized that the mPFC may be required for reversal learning if the reversal is demanding. Furthermore, even if the mPFC is not required, mPFC disinhibition may impair reversals, because it may disrupt processing in mPFC projection sites. To test these hypotheses, we combined bi-directional manipulations of mPFC GABAergic inhibition, using intracerebral drug microinfusion and chemogenetic/DREADD methods, with reversal testing on a food-reinforced two-lever discrimination task in rats. First, we induced mPFC functional inhibition and disinhibition, by microinfusion of the GABA-A receptor agonist muscimol or antagonist picrotoxin, respectively, and examined the impact on early reversals (reversals 1-3) and well-established serial reversals (reversal 5 onwards). Using classical performance measures and Bayesian trial-by-trial strategy analysis, we found that mPFC muscimol impaired early, but not serial, reversals, increasing perseveration and impairing exploratory (lose-shift) behavior at reversal 2. In contrast, mPFC picrotoxin impaired serial reversals, reducing exploratory (lose-shift) and exploitative (win-stay) behavior. Second, to inhibit mPFC GABAergic neurons, we expressed the inhibitory DREADD hM4Di in these neurons; chemogenetic mPFC disinhibition by activation of hM4Di also impaired serial reversal learning, primarily disrupting exploitation. Our findings suggest that mPFC hypoactivation and disinhibition disrupt distinct aspects of reversal learning by different mechanisms. Significance statementSchizophrenia is associated with reduced activation ("hypofrontality") and neural disinhibition (reduced GABAergic inhibition) within the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Yet, it is not clear if and how these distinct aspects of prefrontal dysfunction contribute to impaired reversal learning, a key feature of the cognitive inflexibility characterizing schizophrenia. Here, we combined bi-directional manipulations of prefrontal GABAergic inhibition with testing of reversal learning in rats. Increasing prefrontal functional inhibition (i.e., reducing prefrontal activation) selectively impaired early reversals, enhancing perseveration and reducing exploratory (lose-shift) behavior, whereas prefrontal disinhibition disrupted serial reversals, impairing both exploration and exploitation. Our findings suggest that reduced activation and disinhibition of PFC disrupt distinct aspects of reversal learning, by distinct mechanisms.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Mesencephalic projections to the nucleus accumbens shell modulate value updating during probabilistic reversal learning

Cognitive flexibility, the capacity to adapt behaviour to changes in the environment, is impaired in a range of brain disorders, including substance use disorder and Parkinsons disease. Putative neural substrates of cognitive flexibility include mesencephalic pathways to the ventral striatum (VS) and dorsomedial striatum (DMS), hypothesised to encode learning signals needed to maximize rewarded outcomes during decision-making. However, it is unclear whether mesencephalic projections to the ventral and dorsal striatum are distinct in their contribution to flexible reward-related learning. Here, rats acquired a two-choice spatial probabilistic reversal learning (PRL) task, reinforced on an 80%:20% basis, that assessed the flexibility of behaviour to repeated reversals of response-outcome contingencies. We report that optogenetic stimulation of projections from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) to the nucleus accumbens shell (NAcbS) in the VS significantly impaired reversal learning when optical stimulation was temporally aligned with negative feedback (i.e., reward omission). Moreover, the exploitation-exploration parameter, {beta}, was increased (indicating greater exploitation of information) when this pathway was optogenetically stimulated after a spurious loss (i.e. an incorrect (20%) response at the 80% reinforrced location) compared to after a spurious win (i.e. a correct (20%) response at the 20% reinforced location). VTA [->] NAcbS stimulation during other phases of the behavioural task was without effect. Optogenetic stimulation of projection neurons from the substantia nigra (SN) to the DMS, aligned either with reward receipt or omission or prior to making a choice, had no effect on reversal learning. These findings are consistent with the notion that enhanced activity in VTA [->] NAcbS projections leads to maladaptive perseveration as a consequence of an inappropriate bias to exploitation via positive reinforcement.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2019

Perirhinal input to neocortical layer 1 controls learning

Signals sent back to the neocortex from the hippocampus control the long-term storage of memories in the neocortex1,2, but the cellular mechanisms underlying this process remain elusive. Here, we show that learning is controlled by specific medial-temporal input to neocortical layer 1. To show this we used direct cortical microstimulation detection task that allowed the precise region of learning to be examined and manipulated. Chemogenetically suppressing the last stage of the medial temporal loop, i.e. perirhinal cortex input to neocortical layer 1, profoundly disrupted early memory formation but had no effect on behavior in trained animals. The learning involved the emergence of a small population of layer 5 pyramidal neurons (~10%) with significantly increased firing involving high-frequency bursts of action potentials that were also blocked by suppression of perirhinal input. Moreover, we found that dendritic excitability was correspondingly enhanced in a similarly-sized population of pyramidal neurons and suppression of dendritic activity via optogenetic activation of dendrite-targeting inhibitory neurons also suppressed learning. Finally, single-cell stimulation of cortical layer 5 pyramidal neurons showed that burst but not regular firing retrieved previously learned behavior. We conclude that the medial temporal input to the neocortex controls learning through a process in L1 that elevates dendritic calcium and promotes burst firing.

neuroscience↗