bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

van Soest, A. J. K.

Publications and source records attributed to van Soest, A. J. K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

What is the influence of knee joint movement on the maximal average mechanical power output of human quadriceps femoris muscle?

Performance during motor activities such as wheelchair riding, cycling, rowing and speed skating, depends critically on the average mechanical power output (AMPO) produced by the muscles. To maximise short-duration performance, limb movements should allow muscles to deliver maximal AMPO. However, it is unclear which movement maximises AMPO of human muscle. In this study, we employed a Hill-type muscle-tendon-complex (MTC) model to predict the maximally attainable AMPO of human m. quadriceps femoris for various imposed periodic knee joint movements. Based on these predictions, we selected one set of conditions predicted to yield identical maximally attainable AMPO despite substantial variations in knee joint movements and another set of conditions predicted to yield substantial variations in maximally attainable AMPO. In the experiment, periodic knee joint movements were fully imposed by a knee dynamometer. Participants were instructed to maximise AMPO and, to this end, received visual feedback on their cumulative mechanical work throughout each cycle. Experimental data closely matched predictions derived from the Hill-type MTC model, confirming the validity of the model. Model predictions showed a substantial influence of knee joint movement on the maximally attainable AMPO. Specifically, predictions revealed a strong interaction between cycle frequency and knee joint excursion: increasing one necessitates a decrease in the other to maximise AMPO. Even more interestingly, m. quadriceps femoris should spend about 80% of the cycle duration while shortening, independent of cycle frequency and/or knee joint excursion.

physiology↗

Muscle-controlled physics simulations of the emu (a large running bird) resolve the grounded running paradox

Humans and birds utilize very different running styles. Unlike humans, birds adopt "grounded running" at intermediate speeds - a running gait where at least one foot is always in contact with the ground. Avian grounded running is paradoxical: animals tend to minimize locomotor energy expenditure, but birds prefer grounded running despite incurring higher energy costs. Using predictive gait simulations of the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae), we resolve this paradox by demonstrating that grounded running represents an energetic optimum for birds. Our virtual experiments decoupled biomechanically relevant anatomical features that cannot be isolated in a real bird. The avian body plan prevents (near) vertical leg postures while running, making the running style used by humans impossible. Under this anatomical constraint, grounded running is optimal if the muscles produce the highest forces in crouched postures, as is true in most birds. Anatomical similarities between birds and non-avian dinosaurs suggest that, as a behavior, avian grounded running first evolved within non-avian theropods.

zoology↗