bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

van Hout, D.

Publications and source records attributed to van Hout, D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Microevolution of acquired colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae from ICU patients receiving selective decontamination of the digestive tract.

Colistin is an antibiotic that targets the lipopolysaccharides present in the membranes of Gram-negative bacteria. It is used as last-resort drug to treat infections with multidrug-resistant strains. Colistin is also used in selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD), a prophylactic therapy used in patients hospitalised in intensive care units (ICUs) to selectively eradicate opportunistic pathogens in the oropharyngeal and gut microbiota. In this study, we aimed to unravel the mechanisms of acquired colistin resistance in Gram-negative opportunistic pathogens obtained from SDD-treated patients. Routine surveillance of 428 SDD-treated patients resulted in thirteen strains with acquired colistin resistance (Escherichia coli n=9; Klebsiella aerogenes, n=3; Enterobacter asburiae, n=1) from five patients. Genome sequence analysis showed that these isolates represented multiple distinct colistin-resistant clones, but that within the same patients, colistin-resistant strains were clonally related. We identified previously described mechanisms that lead to colistin resistance, i.e. a G53 substitution in the response regulator PmrA/BasR, and the acquisition of the mobile colistin resistance gene mcr-1.1, but we also observed novel variants of basR with an 18-bp deletion, and a G19E substitution in the sensor histidine kinase BasS. We experimentally confirmed these variants to contribute to reduced colistin susceptibility. In a single patient, we observed that colistin resistance in a single E. coli clone evolved through two unique variants in basRS. We show that prophylactic use of colistin during SDD can select for colistin resistance in species that are not intrinsically colistin-resistant. This highlights the importance of continued surveillance for the emergence of colistin resistance in patients treated with SDD.

microbiology↗

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and non-ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates causing bacteremia in the Netherlands (2014 - 2016) differ in ST distribution, antimicrobial resistance gene and virulence gene content

BackgroundKnowledge on the molecular epidemiology of Escherichia coli causing E. coli bacteremia (ECB) in the Netherlands is mostly based on extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing E. coli (ESBL-Ec). We determined differences in clonality and resistance and virulence gene (VG) content between non-ESBL-producing E. coli (non-ESBL-Ec) and ESBL-Ec blood isolates with different epidemiological characteristics.\n\nMaterials/methodsA random selection of non-ESBL-Ec isolates as well as all available ESBL-Ec blood isolates was obtained from two Dutch hospitals between 2014 and 2016. Whole genome sequencing was performed to infer sequence types (STs), serotypes, acquired antibiotic resistance genes and VG scores, based on presence of 49 predefined putative pathogenic VG.\n\nResultsST73 was most prevalent among the 212 non-ESBL-Ec (N=26, 12.3%) and ST131 among the 69 ESBL-Ec (N=30, 43.5%). Prevalence of ST131 among non-ESBL-Ec was 10.4% (N=22, P value < 0.001 compared to ESBL-Ec). O25:H4 was the most common serotype in both non-ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Ec. Median acquired resistance gene counts were 1 (IQR 1 - 6) and 7 (IQR 4 - 9) for non-ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Ec, respectively (P value < 0.001). Among non-ESBL-Ec, acquired resistance gene count was highest among blood isolates from a primary gastro-intestinal focus (median 4, IQR 1 - 8). Median VG scores were 13 (IQR 9 - 20) and 12 (IQR 8 - 14) for non-ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Ec, respectively (P value = 0.002). VG scores among non-ESBL-Ec from a primary urinary focus (median 15, IQR 11 - 21) were higher compared to non-ESBL-Ec from a primary gastro-intestinal (median 10, IQR 6 - 13) or hepatic-biliary focus (median 11, IQR 5 - 18) (P values = 0.007 and 0.036, respectively). VG content varied between different E. coli STs.\n\nConclusionsNon-ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Ec blood isolates from two Dutch hospitals differed in clonal distribution, resistance gene and VG content. Also, resistance gene and VG content differed between non-ESBL-Ec from different primary foci of ECB.

microbiology↗