Biology subjects

van Honk, J.

Publications and source records attributed to van Honk, J..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Specific amygdala and hippocampal subfield volumes in social anxiety disorder and their relation to clinical characteristics; an international mega-analysis

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) has been associated with alterations in amygdala and hippocampal volume but there is mixed evidence for the direction of volumetric alterations. Additionally, little is known about the involvement of the distinct subfields in the pathophysiology of SAD. Volumetric data from a large multi-centre sample of 107 adult individuals with SAD and 140 healthy controls (HCs) was segmented using FreeSurfer to produce 9 amygdala and 12 hippocampal subfield volumes. Volumes were compared between groups using linear mixed-effects models adjusted for age, age-squared, sex, site and whole amygdala and hippocampal volumes. Subgroup analyses examined subfield volumes in relation to comorbid anxiety disorder, and comorbid major depressive disorder (MDD), psychotropic medication status, and symptom severity. In the full sample, SAD was associated with smaller amygdala volumes in the basal (d=-0.32, pFDR=0.022), accessory basal (d=- 0.42, pFDR=0.005) and corticoamygdaloid transition area (d=-0.37, pFDR=0.014), and larger hippocampal volume in the CA3 (d=0.34, pFDR=0.024), CA4 (d=0.44, pFDR=0.007), dentate gyrus (d=0.35, pFDR=0.022) and molecular layer (d=0.28, pFDR= 0.033), compared to HCs. SAD without comorbid anxiety, in addition, demonstrated smaller lateral amygdala (d=-0.30, pFDR=0.037) and hippocampal amygdala transition area (d=-0.33, pFDR=0.027) relative to HCs. In SAD without comorbid MDD, only the smaller accessory basal amygdala remained significant (d=-0.41, pFDR=0.017). No association was found between subfield volume and medication status or symptom severity. In conclusion, we observed distinct patterns of volumetric differences across specific amygdala and hippocampal subfields, regions that are associated with sensory information processing, threat evaluation and fear generalization. These findings suggest a possible disruption in information flow between the amygdala and hippocampal formation for fear processing in SAD.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Hippocampal and amygdala subfield volumes in obsessive-compulsive disorder differ according to medication status.

IntroAlthough it has been suggested that the hippocampus and amygdala (HA) are involved in the neurobiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), volumetric findings have been inconsistent. Furthermore, the HA consist of heterogenous anatomic units with specific functions and cytoarchitecture, and little work has been undertaken on the volumetry of these subfields in OCD. MethodsT1-weighted images from 381 patients with OCD and 338 healthy controls (HCs) from the OCD Brain Imaging Consortium were segmented to produce twelve hippocampal subfields and nine amygdala subfields using FreeSurfer 6.0. We assessed between-group differences in subfield volume using a mixed-effects model adjusted for age, quadratic effects of age, sex, site, and whole HA volume. Given evidence of confounding effects of clinical characteristics on brain volumes in OCD, we also performed subgroup analyses to examine subfield volume in relation to comorbid anxiety and depression, medication status, and symptom severity. ResultsPatients with OCD and HCs did not significantly differ in HA subfield volume. However, medicated patients with OCD had significantly smaller hippocampal dentate gyrus (pFDR=0.042, d=-0.26) and molecular layer (pFDR=0.042, d=-0.29) and larger lateral (pFDR=0.049, d=0.23) and basal (pFDR=0.049, d=0.25) amygdala subfields than HCs. Unmedicated patients had significantly smaller hippocampal CA1 (pFDR=0.016, d=-0.28) than HCs. No association was detected between any subfield volume and OCD severity. ConclusionDifferences in HA subfields between OCD and HCs are dependent on medication status, in line with previous work on other brain volumetric alterations in OCD. This emphasizes the importance of considering psychotropic medication in neuroimaging studies of OCD.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Testosterone eliminates strategic prosocial behavior

Humans are strategically more prosocial when their actions are being watched by others than when they act alone. Using a psychopharmacogenetic approach, we investigated the endocrinological and computational mechanisms of such audience-driven prosociality. 192 male participants received either a single dose of testosterone (150 mg) or a placebo and performed a prosocial and self-benefitting reinforcement learning task. Crucially, the task was performed either in private or when being watched. Rival theories suggest that the hormone might either diminish or strengthen audience-dependent prosociality. We show that exogenous testosterone fully eliminated strategic, i.e., feigned, prosociality and thus decreased submission to audience expectations. We next performed reinforcement-learning drift-diffusion computational modeling to elucidate which latent aspects of decision-making testosterone acted on. The modeling revealed that testosterone compared to placebo did not deteriorate reinforcement learning per se. Rather, when being watched, the hormone altered the degree to which the learned information on choice value translated to action selection. Taken together, our study provides novel evidence of testosterones effects on implicit reward processing, through which it counteracts conformity and deceptive reputation strategies.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

In amygdala we trust: different contributions of the basolateral and central amygdala in learning whom to trust

Human societies are built on cooperation and mutual trust, but not everybody is trustworthy. Research on rodents suggests an essential role of the basolateral amygdala (BLA) in learning from social experiences (Hernandez-Lallement J et al., 2016), which was also confirmed in human subjects with selective bilateral BLA damage as they failed to adapt their trust behavior towards trustworthy vs. untrustworthy interaction partners (Rosenberger LA et al., 2019). However, neuroimaging in neurotypical populations did not consistently report involvement of the amygdala in trust behavior. This might be explained by the difficulty of differentiating between amygdalas structurally and functionally different subnuclei, i.e., the BLA and central amygdala (CeA), which have even antagonistic features particularly in trust behavior (van Honk J et al., 2013). Here, we used fMRI of the amygdala subnuclei of neurotypical adults (n=31f/31m) engaging in the repeated trust game. Our data show that both the BLA and the CeA play a role and indeed differentially: While the BLA was most active when obtaining feedback on whether invested trust had been reciprocated or not, the CeA was most active when subjects were preparing their next trust decision. In the latter phase, improved learning was associated with higher activation differences in response to untrustworthy vs. trustworthy trustees, in both BLA and CeA. Our data not only translate to rodent models and support our earlier findings in BLA-damaged subjects, but also show the specific contributions of other brain structures in the amygdala-centered network in learning whom to trust, and better not to trust. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTIn this fMRI study, the central amygdala was found active during trust behavior planning, while the basolateral amygdala was active during outcome evaluation. When planning trust behavior, central and basolateral amygdala activation differences between the players was related to whether participants learned to differentiate the players trustworthiness. Nucleus accumbens tracked whether trust was reciprocated but was not related to learning. This suggests learning whom to trust is not related to reward processing in the nucleus accumbens but rather to engagement of the basolateral amygdala. This study overcomes major empirical gaps between animal models and human neuroimaging and shows how different amygdala subnuclei and connected areas orchestrate learning to form different subjective trustworthiness beliefs about others and guide trust choice behavior.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

The territory of my body: Testosterone prevents limb cooling in the Rubber Hand Illusion

The Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI) is an experimental paradigm for assessing changes in body ownership. Recent findings in the field suggest that social-emotional variables can influence such changes. Since body ownership is a mechanism that enables subjects to organise information about the environment and interact efficiently in it, changes in body ownership should have important implications for social power. In the current study, we investigated whether 0.5mg of testosterone, a steroid hormone strongly implicated in the achievement of power and dominance, affected the RHI. Forty-nine females participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment in which the RHI was induced. Compared to placebo, testosterone had no effects on the usual alteration of subjective ownership over the rubber limb or on subjective sense of proprioceptive drift. However, unlike the placebo group, testosterone-treated participants did not display an objective decline in the temperature of their own (hidden) hand following induction of the illusion. These findings suggest that testosterone strengthens implicit but not explicit bodily self-representations. We propose that effective maintenance of implicit body boundaries can be regarded, conceptually, as a primary defensive state facilitating integrity of the self.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Neural responses in the pain matrix when observing pain of others are unaffected by testosterone administration

There is evidence of testosterone having deteriorating effects on cognitive and affective empathy. However, whether testosterone influences core affective empathy, that is empathy for pain, has not yet been investigated. Therefore, we tested neural responses to witnessing others in pain in a within-subject placebo controlled testosterone administration study. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging we provide affirming evidence that the empathy inducing paradigm causes changes in the activity throughout the pain circuitry, including the bilateral insula and anterior cingulate cortex. Administration of testosterone however did not influence these activation patterns in the pain matrix. Testosterone has thus downregulating effects on aspects of empathic behaviour, but based on these data does not seem to influence neural responses during core empathy for pain. This finding gives more insight into the role of testosterone in human empathy.

neuroscience↗