Biology subjects

van Dijk, L. J. A.

Publications and source records attributed to van Dijk, L. J. A..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Global homeostatic forces shape the composition of a hyperdiverse tropical insect fauna

Despite comprising the bulk of terrestrial biodiversity, we know surprisingly little about insect faunas, particularly in the tropics. Here, we characterize the insect fauna of Madagascar, a global biodiversity hotspot, based on extensive DNA metabarcoding of Malaise trap and leaf litter samples. We estimate that the fauna comprises at least 250,000 species, only 5% of which are currently recorded. The ecological and taxonomic composition is surprisingly similar to that of temperate forests. We show that this is likely caused by global homeostatic forces shaping net diversification rates after colonization of Madagascar rather than by the composition of colonizing lineages. Features differing from temperate forests include the dearth of parasitoids and richness of beetles. Understanding the forces shaping these patterns is key in sustainable management of tropical insect faunas.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2024

Data of the Insect Biome Atlas: a metabarcoding survey of the terrestrial arthropods of Sweden and Madagascar

We present the data from the Insect Biome Atlas project (IBA), characterizing the terrestrial arthropod faunas of Sweden and Madagascar. Over 12 months, weekly Malaise trap samples were collected at 203 locations within 100 sites in Sweden and at 50 locations within 33 sites in Madagascar; this was complemented by soil and litter samples from each site. The field samples comprise 4,749 Malaise trap, 192 soil and 192 litter samples from Sweden and 2,566 Malaise trap and 190 litter samples from Madagascar. Samples were processed using mild lysis or homogenization, followed by DNA metabarcoding of COI (418 bp). The data comprise 698,378 non-chimeric sequence variants from Sweden and 687,866 from Madagascar, representing 33,989 (33,046 Arthropoda) and 77,599 (77,380 Arthropoda) operational taxonomic units, respectively. These are the most comprehensive data presented on these faunas so far, allowing unique analyses of the size, composition, spatial turnover and seasonal dynamics of the sampled communities. They also provide an invaluable baseline against which to gauge future changes.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2024

High-throughput biodiversity surveying sheds new light on the brightest of insect taxa

Sampling of species-rich taxa followed by DNA metabarcoding is quickly becoming a popular high-throughput method for biodiversity inventories. Unfortunately, we know little about its accuracy and efficiency, as the results mostly pertain to poorly-known organism groups in underexplored environments or regions of the world. Here we ask what an extensive sampling effort based on Malaise trapping and metabarcoding can tell us about the lepidopteran fauna of Sweden - one of the best-understood insect taxa in one of the most-surveyed countries of the world. Specifically, we deployed 197 Malaise traps for a single year across Sweden in a systematic sampling design, then metabarcoded the resulting 4,749 bulk samples, and compared the results to existing data sources. We detected more than half (1,535) of the 2,990 lepidopteran species ever recorded as occurring in Sweden, and 323 species not reported during the sampling period by other data providers. Full-length barcoding of individual specimens confirmed three new species for the country and extensive range extensions for two species. It also corroborated eight genetically distinct COI variants that may represent new species to science, one of which has since been described. Most of the new records are for small and inconspicuous species and poorly surveyed regions, suggesting that they represent previously overlooked components of the fauna. Our findings, corroborated by independent metagenomic analyses, show that DNA metabarcoding can be a highly efficient and accurate method of biodiversity sampling, to the extent that it can generate significant new discoveries even for the most well-known of insect faunas.

zoology↗

bioRxiv2024

Biotic and abiotic drivers of ecosystem functioning differ between a temperate and a tropical region

Any single ecosystem will provide many ecosystem functions. Whether these functions tend to increase in concert or trade off against each other is a question of much current interest. Equally topical are the drivers behind ecosystem function rates. Yet, we lack large-scale systematic studies that investigate how abiotic factors can directly or indirectly -- via effects on biodiversity -- drive ecosystem functioning. In this study, we assessed the impact of climate, landscape and biotic community on ecosystem functioning and multifunctioning in the temperate and tropical zone, and investigated potential trade-offs among ecosystem functions in both zones. To achieve this, we measured a diverse set of insect-related ecosystem functions -- including herbivory, seed dispersal, predation, decomposition and pollination -- at 50 sites across Madagascar and 171 sites across Sweden, and characterized the insect community at each site using Malaise traps. We used structural equations models to infer causality of the effects of climate, landscape, and biodiversity on ecosystem functioning. For the temperate zone, we found that abiotic factors were more important than biotic factors in driving ecosystem functioning, while in the tropical zone, effects of biotic drivers were most pronounced. In terms of trade-offs among functions, in the temperate zone, only seed dispersal and predation were positively correlated, while all other functions were uncorrelated. By contrast, in the tropical zone, most ecosystem functions increased in concert, highlighting that tropical ecosystems can simultaneously provide a diverse set of functions. These correlated functions in Madagascar could for the most part be explained by similar responses to local climate, landscape, and biota. Our study suggests that the functioning of temperate and tropical ecosystems differs fundamentally in patterns and drivers. Without a better understanding of these differences, it will be impossible to correctly predict shifts in ecosystem functioning in response to environmental disturbances. To identify global patterns and drivers of ecosystem functioning, we will next need replicate sampling across biomes - as here achieved for two regions, thus paving the road and setting the baseline expectations.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2020

Spring phenology dominates over shade in affecting seedling performance and plant attack during the growing season

O_LIClimate change is affecting both the abiotic environment and the seasonal timing of life history events, with potentially major consequences for plant performance and plant-associated food webs. Despite this, we lack insights into how effects of plant phenology on plant performance and food webs depend on environmental conditions, and to what extent effects of phenology and the environment on plant performance are direct vs. mediated by changes in the plant-associated community. C_LIO_LIWe conducted a multifactorial field experiment to test for the effect of spring phenology and shade on Quercus robur seedling traits and performance, as well as attacks by specialist plant pathogens, insects and small mammals. C_LIO_LISpring phenology strongly affected seedling performance whereas shade only affected leaf thickness and chlorophyll. Likewise, spring phenology strongly affected herbivore and pathogen attack, whereas shade and its interaction with spring phenology only explained a minor part of the variation. Small mammals preferentially attacked later phenology seedlings, which strongly affected plant survival, while insect herbivores and pathogens did not mediate the effect of spring phenology and shade on plant performance. C_LIO_LISynthesis: This study highlights that the effect of spring phenology outweighs the effect of environmental context on plant performance and plant attack during the growing season. Interestingly, small mammal herbivores, and not diseases and insect herbivores, may play a key role in mediating the effect of spring phenology on plant performance. Together, these findings advance our understanding of the consequences of climate-induced changes in spring phenology and the abiotic environment on plant performance within a community context. C_LI

ecology↗