Biology subjects

de Riols de Fonclare, D.

Publications and source records attributed to de Riols de Fonclare, D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

A 10-year longitudinal study reveals bat-driven SARSr-CoV evolution

Bats are recognized reservoirs for several zoonoses and have an exceptional tolerance to viruses, likely linked with strong evolutionary selection in immune genes. Notably, in light of the emergence history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), SARS-CoV-2 is hypothesized to have originated from Rhinolophus bats as well. In-depth studies are still needed, however, to unravel how SARS-related coronaviruses (SARSr-CoVs) persist and thrive in nature through evolution, virus-host interactions, and cross-species transmission. Here we present a pioneering 10-year longitudinal study of BBCoV-EPI1, a SARSr-CoV in Rhinolophus bats that revealed the complexity of virus-host interactions and the tempo at which new viral lineages emerge. Our results demonstrated the impacts of host life cycles (hibernation, female gathering, weaning juveniles, and mating periods) on strong seasonal oscillations in viral prevalence. These pronounced fluctuations drove viral diversification through bottlenecks, founder effects and Darwinian selection, counterbalanced by high mutation rates, fast gradualism, and recombination. We also found that host-cell enzymes are major contributors to BBCoV-EPI1 evolution in bats. The antiviral effect of APOBEC3 detected here in bats is weaker than it is in humans. Conversely, the ADAR enzyme had an unexpectedly strong and beneficial influence on viral evolution, even though the high mutation rate of RNA viruses is usually attributed to viral polymerases' low replication fidelity. We discovered that key BBCoV-EPI1 innovations in Rhinolophus bats were mostly located in proteins involved in cell-cycle hijack and in blocking bat cells' antiviral response, rather than in the Spike (S). We also showed that the BBCoV-EPI1 S protein efficiently uses angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor to enter Rhinolophus bat cells, but not to enter human or sympatric species cells, due to amino-acid differences at the S-ACE2 interface. Last, this work identifies 101 critical amino-acid changes frequently associated with viral fitness shift, and paves the way for future experimental studies focusing on the capacity of SARSr-CoVs to adapt to hosts and cross the species barrier.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2022

A large-scale serological survey in pets from October 2020 through June 2021 in France shows significantly higher exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in cats

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can infect many animals, including pets such as dogs and cats. Many studies have documented infection in companion animals by bio-molecular and serological methods. However, only a few have compared seroprevalence in cats and dogs from the general population, and these studies were limited by small sample sizes and collections over short periods. Our goal was to obtain a more accurate evaluation of seroprevalence in companion animals in France and to determine whether cats and dogs differ in their exposure to SARS-CoV-2. For this purpose, we conducted an extensive SARS-CoV-2 cross-sectional serological survey of 2036 cats and 3577 dogs sampled by veterinarians during medical examinations in clinics throughout France. Sampling was carried out from October 2020 through June 2021, a period encompassing the second and third waves of SARS-CoV-2 infections in humans in the country. Using a microsphere immunoassay targeting the receptor binding domain and trimeric spike protein, we found 7.1% seroprevalence in pets. In a subset of 308 seropositive samples, 26.3% had neutralizing antibodies. We found that cats were significantly more likely to test positive than dogs, with seropositivity rates of 9.3% and 5.9% in cats and dogs, respectively. Finally, data for both species showed that seroprevalence was lower in older animals and was not associated with the date of sampling or the sex of the animal. Our results show that cats are significantly more sensitive to SARS-CoV-2 than dogs, in line with experimental studies. Our large sample size provides for a reliable, statistically robust estimate of the frequency of infection of pets from their owners and offers strong support for the notion that cats are more sensitive to SARS-CoV-2 than dogs. Our findings emphasise the importance of a One-Health approach to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and raise the question of whether companion animals in close contact with humans should be vaccinated.

microbiology↗