Biology subjects

d'Adda di Fagagna, F.

Publications and source records attributed to d'Adda di Fagagna, F..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

The glycine-arginine-rich motif of 53BP1 modulates RNA interactions necessary for its liquid-liquid phase separation during DNA Damage Response

The DNA damage response relies on the rapid assembly of repair factors into foci with properties of liquid-liquid phase separation, driven by de novo transcription of damage-induced RNAs. 53BP1 is a key component of these condensates, yet the molecular determinants driving this process remain unknown. Here, through computational, structural and in vitro approaches, we identify the oligomerization domain of 53BP1 and its glycine-arginine-rich (GAR) motif as crucial for RNA interactions and phase separation. Biophysical characterization reveals that 53BP1-RNA condensates can progressively mature into a more stable state, and that GAR mutants display aberrant material properties. Using a cellular model of telomere fusion events, we demonstrate that the GAR motif is essential for 53BP1-mediated DNA repair, which depends on the combined contributions of RNA binding and appropriate condensate biophysical properties. Therefore, RNA-driven 53BP1 condensation is functionally required to maintain genome integrity.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2024

DNA damage response defects induced by the formation of TDP-43 and mutant FUS cytoplasmic inclusions and their pharmacological rescue.

Formation of cytoplasmic inclusions (CIs) of TDP-43 and FUS, along with DNA damage accumulation, is a hallmark of affected motor neurons in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). However, the impact of CIs on DNA damage response (DDR) and repair in this pathology remains unprobed. Here, we show that CIs of TDP-43 and FUSP525L, co-localizing with stress granules, lead to a dysfunctional DDR activation associated with physical DNA breakage. Inhibition of the activity of the DDR kinase ATM, but not of ATR, abolishes DDR signaling, indicating that DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the primary source of DDR activation. In addition, cells with TDP-43 and FUSP525L CIs exhibit reduced DNA damage-induced RNA synthesis at DSBs. We previously showed that the two endoribonucleases DROSHA and DICER, also known to interact with TDP-43 and FUS during small RNA processing, contribute to DDR signaling at DSBs. Treatment with enoxacin, which stimulates DDR and repair by boosting the enzymatic activity of DICER, restores a proficient DDR and reduces DNA damage accumulation in cultured cells with CIs and in vivo in a murine model of ALS. In Drosophila melanogaster, Dicer-2 overexpression rescues TDP-43-mediated retinal degeneration. In summary, our results indicate that the harmful effects caused by TDP-43 and FUS proteinopathies include genotoxic stress and that the pharmacological stimulation of the DNA damage signaling and repair counteracts it.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2024

DROSHA, DICER and Damage-Induced long ncRNA control BMI1-dependent transcriptional repression at DNA double-strand break

Genome integrity is safeguarded by the DNA damage response (DDR). Controlled transcriptional dampening of genes surrounding DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) has been shown to facilitate DNA repair. This phenomenon, defined as DSB-induced silencing in cis (DISC), involves the DDR apical kinase ATM and the Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1). Conversely, DSBs have also been reported to induce de novo transcription of damaged-induced long non-coding RNAs (dilncRNAs) in a MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MNR) complex-dependent manner. MRN also controls the recruitment to DSB of the ribonuclease DROSHA, which together with DICER, stimulates DDR signaling and DNA repair. Here, we reconcile these apparently contrasting observations by showing that dilncRNA, together with DROSHA and DICER, but not GW182-like proteins required for miRNA-mediated gene silencing, controls DISC. Indeed, similarly to ATM, MRN inhibition abolishes DISC while pharmacological enhancement of DICER ribonuclease activity by Enoxacin improves DISC. Importantly, Enoxacin administration restores DISC upon ATM inhibition, demonstrating that DICER promotes DISC independently from ATM. Differently, Enoxacin does not restore DISC upon MRN inhibition, suggesting that DICER acts downstream to dilncRNA biogenesis and DROSHA recruitment. Mechanistically, we show that DROSHA and DICER control the recruitment of the PRC1 component BMI1 at DSBs and the consequent H2A-K119 ubiquitination. Upon DSBs formation, BMI1 and DROSHA interact in an RNA-dependent manner. Indeed, BMI1 associates to dilncRNA and do so in a DROSHA- and DICER-dependent manner. Importantly, inhibition of dilncRNA function by antisense oligonucleotides or Cas13-mediated targeting is sufficient to reduce BMI1 recruitment and DISC at individual loci. We propose that dilncRNAs together with DROSHA and DICER control DISC at genomic DSB by supporting PRC1 recruitment and chromatin ubiquitination.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2021

DNA damage response at telomeres boosts the transcription of SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 during aging

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is known to be more common in the elderly, who show also more severe symptoms and a higher risk of hospitalization and death. Here we show that the expression of the Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2), the SARS-CoV2 cell receptor, increases during aging in mouse and human lungs, and following telomere shortening or dysfunction in mammalian cells and in mouse models. This increase is regulated at the transcription level, and Ace2 promoter activity is DNA damage response (DDR)-dependent. Indeed, ATM inhibition or the selective inhibition of telomeric DDR, through the use of antisense oligonucleotides, prevents Ace2 upregulation following telomere damage, in cultured cells and in mice. We propose that during aging telomeric shortening, by triggering DDR activation, causes the upregulation of ACE2, the SARS-CoV2 cell receptor, thus making the elderly likely more susceptible to the infection.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2018

DROSHA associates to DNA damage sites and is required for DNA repair

The DNA damage response (DDR) is the signaling cascade through which a cell recognizes DNA lesions, and promotes their resolution via the repair pathways of Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ), or Homologous Recombination (HR). We recently demonstrated that DROSHA boosts DDR signaling by processing damage-induced long non-coding RNAs into smaller DNA damage response RNAs (DDRNAs). However, the location at which DROSHA exerts its DDR functions, relative to sites of DNA damage, remains unknown.\n\nTo investigate DROSHAs localization during DDR activation, we used the DiVA cellular system, which allows the controlled induction of several DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) in the human genome. Indeed, by genome wide chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by next generation sequencing, we demonstrate that DROSHA associates with DSBs. In support of this, DSB-recruitment of DROSHA is detectable at the single-cell level by Proximity Ligation Assay between DROSHA and known DDR markers, and by DNA damage in situ ligation followed by Proximity Ligation Assay (DI-PLA), which demonstrates proximity of DROSHA to DNA ends. DROSHA recruitment occurs at both genic and inter-genic DSBs, suggesting that its recruitment is independent from ongoing transcription preceding damage generation. DROSHAs recruitment to DNA lesions occurs throughout the cell cycle, and with a preference for NHEJ-prone DSBs. Consistently, inhibition of the HR pathway increases DROSHA recruitment, and DROSHA knock down strongly impairs NHEJ efficiency in a GFP-reporter cellular system for monitoring NHEJ DNA repair. Overall, these results demonstrate that DROSHA acts locally at sites of DNA damage to promote NHEJ DNA repair.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2018

A role for RNA and DNA:RNA hybrids in the modulation of DNA repair by homologous recombination

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are toxic DNA lesions which, if not properly repaired, may lead to genomic instability, cell death and senescence. Damage-induced long non-coding RNAs (dilncRNAs) are transcribed from broken DNA ends and contribute to DNA damage response (DDR) signaling. Here we show that dilncRNAs play a role in DSB repair by homologous recombination (HR) by contributing to the recruitment of the HR proteins BRCA1, BRCA2, and RAD51, without affecting DNA-end resection. In S/G2-phase cells, dilncRNAs pair to the resected DNA ends and form DNA:RNA hybrids, which are recognized by BRCA1 and promote its recruitment to DSBs. We also show that RNase H2 is in a complex with the HR proteins BRCA1, PALB2, BRCA2, and RAD51, and that it localizes to DSBs in the S/G2 cell-cycle phase. BRCA2 controls DNA:RNA hybrid levels at DSBs by mediating RNase H2 recruitment and, therefore, hybrids degradation. These results demonstrate that regulated DNA:RNA hybrid levels at DSBs contribute to HR-mediated repair.

cell biology↗