Zusi, L. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2022

Steering clear of the confusion effect: aerial predators target fixed points in dense prey aggregations

Collective behaviours are widely assumed to confuse predators, but empirical support for a confusion effect is often lacking, and its importance must depend on the predators targeting mechanism. Here we show that raptors steer attacks on swarming bats by turning towards a fixed point in the swarm, rather than by using closed-loop pursuit of an individual. Any prey that the predator is on a collision course with will appear on a constant bearing, so target selection emerges naturally from the geometry of a collision. Our results show how predators can simplify the demands on their sensory system by decoupling steering from targeting when grabbing prey from a dense swarm. We anticipate that the same tactic will be used against flocks and schools across a wide range of taxa, in which case a confusion effect is paradoxically more likely to occur in attacks on sparse groups, for which steering and targeting cannot be decoupled.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2020

Birds versus bats: attack strategies of bat-hunting hawks, and the dilution effect of swarming

Aggregation behaviors can often reduce predation risk, whether through dilution, confusion, or vigilance effects, but these effects are challenging to measure under natural conditions, involving strong interactions between the behaviors of predators and prey. Here we study aerial predation of massive swarms of Brazilian free-tailed bats Tadarida brasiliensis by Swainsons hawks Buteo swainsoni, testing how the behavioral strategies of predator and prey influence catch success and predation risk. The hawks achieved high overall catch success, but they were no more successful against lone bats than against bats flying in column formation. There was therefore no evidence of any net vigilance or confusion effect, and hawks attacking the column benefitted from the opportunity to make several attempted grabs. Even so, the bats overall risk of predation was an order of magnitude higher when flying alone. Attacks on lone bats ([~]10% of attacks) were greatly overrepresented relative to the proportion of bats classified as flying alone ([~]0.2%), so dilution is both necessary and sufficient to explain the higher survival rates of bats flying in the column. From the hawks perspective, their odds of catching a bat more than trebled if the attack involved a stoop rather than level flight, or a rolling rather than pitching grab maneuver. These behavioral tactics were independently deployed in nearly three-quarters of all attacks. Hence, whereas the survival rate of a bat depends principally on whether it flies alone or in a group, the catch success of a hawk depends principally on how it maneuvers to attack. Lay summaryBats emerging by daylight from a massive desert roost are able to minimise their predation risk by maintaining tight column formation, because the hawks that attack them target stragglers disproportionately often. Whereas the predation risk of a bat therefore depends on how it maintains its position within the swarm, the catch success of a hawk depends on how it maneuvers to attack. Catch success is maximised by executing a stooping dive or a rolling grab.

animal behavior and cognition↗