Biology subjects

Zoppoli, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Zoppoli, G..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Biological modifications of the immune response to COVID-19 vaccine in patients treated with anti-CD20 agents and immune-checkpoint inhibitors

Investigating the impact of immune-modulating therapies on mRNA vaccine efficacy transcends the immediate context of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study focuses on the differential immune responses to the third dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine among healthy volunteers, cancer patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and those treated with the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. Utilizing RNA sequencing, serology, and interferon-{gamma} release assessment, we charted the temporal dynamics of the immune response in such cohorts. Our findings indicate that ICIs maintain an immune profile similar to that of healthy individuals, whereas treatment with rituximab is associated with impairment of type I interferon response and the upregulation of transcripts pertaining to regulatory T cells, with a global dysfunction of both humoral and cellular immunity. This research deepens our understanding of the sophisticated interplay within the immune system in health and disease states, potentially informing therapeutic strategies across a spectrum of immunological conditions. Significance statementOur study examines how cancer treatments that modify the immune system affect transcriptional, serological, and cellular responses to a model for repeated antigenic stimulation in humans, represented by the SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccine. Specifically, we investigated patients treated with rituximab (RTX), which impairs antibody production, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), which can trigger autoimmune disorders. We discovered that RTX-treated patients not only exhibit a reduced antibody response but actually show a diminished interferon-mediated immune response, indicating a broader immune disruption than anticipated. Conversely, ICI-treated patients responded to the vaccine similarly to healthy individuals, suggesting that fears of adverse vaccine reactions in these patients may be unfounded. This research highlights important considerations for the clinical management of cancer patients receiving these treatments.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2023

Modulation of SLFN11 induces changes in DNA Damage response

BackgroundLack of Schlafen family member 11 (SLFN11) expression has been recently identified as a dominant genomic determinant of response to DNA damaging agents in numerous cancer types. Thus, strategies aimed at increasing SLFN11 could be used to restore chemosensitivity of refractory cancers. As oncogenic downregulation is often driven by methylation of the promotor region, we explore the demethylation effect of 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine (decitabine), on the SLFN11 gene methylation. Since SLFN11 has been reported as an interferon inducible gene, and interferon is secreted during an active anti-tumor immune response, we investigated the in vitro effect of IFN-{gamma} on SLFN11 expression in breast cancer cell lines. A second broader approach to show cross talk between immune cells and SLFN11 expression is indirect co-culture of breast cancer cells with activated PBMCs and evaluate if this can drive SLFN11 upregulation. Finally, as a definitive and specific way to modulate SLFN11 expression we implemented SLFN11 dCas9 (dead CRISPR associated protein 9) systems to specifically increase or decrease SLFN11 expression. ResultsWe first confirmed a correlation previously reported between methylation of SLFN11 promoter and its expression across multiple cell lines. We showed in-vitro that decitabine and IFN-{gamma} could increase moderately the expression of SLFN11 in both BT- 549 and T47D cell lines, but not in strongly methylated cell lines such as MDA-MB-231. Though, in-vitro, the co-culture of the same cell lines with CD8-CD25 activated PBMC failed to increase SLFN11 expression. On the one hand, the use of a CRISPR-dCas9 UNISAM system could increase SLFN11 expression significantly (up to 5-fold), stably and specifically in BT-549 and T47D cancer cell lines. Though, this system also failed to force a strong expression of SLFN11 in cell lines with robust SLFN11 promoter methylation such as MDA-MB-231. On the other hand, the use of CRISPR-dCas9 KRAB could significantly reduce the expression of SLFN11 in BT-549 and T47D. We then used the modified cell lines to confirm the alteration in chemo sensitivity of those cells to treatment with DNA Damaging Agents (DDAs) such as Cisplatin and Epirubicin or DNA Damage Response (DDRs) drugs like Olaparib. RNAseq was used to elucidate the mechanisms of action affected by the alteration in SLFN11 expression. ConclusionTo our knowledge this is the first report of the stable non-lethal increase of SLFN11 expression in a cancer cell line. Our results show that induction of SLFN11 expression can enhance DDA and DDR sensitivity in breast cancer cells and dCas9 systems may represent a novel approach to increase SLFN11 and achieve higher sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents, improving outcome or decreasing required drug concentrations. SLFN11-targeting therapies might be explored pre-clinically to develop personalized approaches.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2021

High temporal resolution transcriptomic profiling delineates distinct patterns of interferon response following Covid-19 mRNA vaccination and SARS-CoV2 infection

Knowledge of the mechanisms underpinning the development of protective immunity conferred by mRNA vaccines is fragmentary. Here we investigated responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccination via ultra-low-volume sampling and high-temporal-resolution transcriptome profiling (23 subjects across 22 timepoints, and with 117 COVID-19 patients used as comparators). There were marked differences in the timing and amplitude of the responses to the priming and booster doses. Notably, we identified two distinct interferon signatures. The first signature (A28/S1) was robustly induced both post-prime and post-boost and in both cases correlated with the subsequent development of antibody responses. In contrast, the second interferon signature (A28/S2) was robustly induced only post-boost, where it coincided with a transient inflammation peak. In COVID19 patients, a distinct phenotype dominated by A28/S2 was associated with longer duration of intensive care. In summary, high-temporal-resolution transcriptomic permitted the identification of post- vaccination phenotypes that are determinants of the course of COVID-19 disease.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2020

SLFN11 captures cancer-immunity interactions associated with platinum sensitivity in ovarian cancer

Large independent analyses on cancer cell lines followed by functional studies have identified Schlafen 11 (SLFN11), a putative DNA/RNA helicase, as the strongest predictor of sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. However, its role as a prognostic biomarker is undefined, partially due to the lack of validated methods to score SLFN11 in human tissues. Here, we implemented a pipeline to quantify SLFN11 in human cancer samples. By analyzing a cohort of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma specimens prior platinum-based chemotherapy treatment, we demonstrate that SLFN11 is expressed by infiltrating innate and adaptive immune cells. We show, for the first time, that SLFN11 density in both the neoplastic and microenvironmental components was independently associated with favorable outcome. Transcriptomic analyses suggested the presence of a hitherto modulation of the cancer-immunity cycle orchestrated by SLFN11. We propose SLFN11 as a dual biomarker capturing simultaneously interconnected immunological and cancercell-intrinsic functional dispositions associated with sensitivity to DNA damaging agents.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2020

A modular framework for the development of targeted Covid-19 blood transcript profiling panels

Covid-19 morbidity and mortality are associated with a dysregulated immune response. Tools are needed to enhance existing immune profiling capabilities in affected patients. Here we aimed to develop an approach to support the design of focused blood transcriptome panels for profiling the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. We designed a pool of candidates based on a pre-existing and well-characterized repertoire of blood transcriptional modules. Available Covid-19 blood transcriptome data was also used to guide this process. Further selection steps relied on expert curation. Additionally, we developed several custom web applications to support the evaluation of candidates. As a proof of principle, we designed three targeted blood transcript panels, each with a different translational connotation: therapeutic development relevance, SARS biology relevance and immunological relevance. Altogether the work presented here may contribute to the future expansion of immune profiling capabilities via targeted profiling of blood transcript abundance in Covid-19 patients.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2019

Conditional activation of immune-related signatures and prognostic significance: a pan-cancer analysis

BackgroundIt is becoming clear that tumor immune T cell infiltration and its functional orientation have substantial effect on cancer progression, influencing both response to therapy and prognosis. In this pan-cancer study, the previously described Immunologic Constant of Rejection (ICR) signature is used to define opposing immune phenotypes (i.e., immuneactive and immune-silent) across 31 different histologies. We systematically analyze the interconnections between the genetic programming of neoplasms and their immune orientation across different histologies, and the prognostic impact of such interplay. Moreover, we investigated the predictive value of ICR classification across various public datasets of immune checkpoint inhibition therapy. MethodsRNA-seq data of samples from a total of 9,282 patient tumor samples representing 31 cancer types were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We classified each cancer type based on the expression of the ICR gene signature. Oncogenic pathway gene set enrichment and mutational status were analyzed in relation to ICR phenotypes. To explore whether tumorintrinsic attributes associate with the prognostic value of ICR across cancers, we compared mutational load, oncogenic alterations and expression of oncogenic pathways between cancer types using an integrative bioinformatic pipeline. ResultsOur analyses identified a distinct prognostic connotation of ICR depending on cancer histology. We identified several oncogenic pathways whose enrichment inversely correlated with ICR in multiple tumor types. We found several cancer specific pathways that were differentially enriched between tumors in which ICR had a prognostic impact versus the ones in which ICR did not bear any prognostic connotation such as proliferation and TGF-beta signaling. Importantly, this conditional impact of ICR was also validated in the context of immune checkpoint inhibition treatment. ConclusionsWe identified tumor-intrinsic attributes that correlate with immune phenotypes and potentially influence their development. In addition, a relationship was observed between the enrichment of oncogenic pathways and the prognostic significance of the ICR and its predictive value for patients treated with anti-CTLA4 immune checkpoint inhibition. Such information can be used to prioritize potential candidates for therapies aimed at converting immune-silent into immuneactive tumors and to refine stratification algorithms.

cancer biology↗