bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Zedrosser, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Zedrosser, A..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Using activity data to estimate brown bear den exit and entry dates

BackgroundIn hibernating mammals, the timing of den entry and exit reflects complex interactions among environment, physiology, and energetic constraints, with consequences for fitness. Consequently, shifts in denning phenology can affect population dynamics, particularly under climate change. Reliable estimation of denning timing is therefore critical, yet current methods often rely on GPS-derived movement data, limited by coarse sampling intervals, detection issues, and the inability to distinguish true inactivity from active presence at the den site. In this study, we developed and apply a method to estimate denning phenology in a brown bear population in south-central Sweden using accelerometer-derived activity data. Our approach employs adaptive, individual-specific thresholds to account for variation in baseline activity across bears, focusing on day-to-day changes to identify the start and end of inactivity periods. This method allows flexible and reproducible detection of den entry and exit dates, overcoming limitations associated with fixed thresholds and small sample sizes. ResultsWe compared activity-based estimates with GPS-derived den occupancy and examined variation in denning behavior across demographic groups. Analyzing 388 bear-winters, the method successfully identified inactivity periods in 360 cases. The method failed to identify clear start and end dates of hibernation for 28 (7%) bear-winters, which were characterized by unusually high or low daily activity levels at the boundaries of the inactivity period. Den site occupancy ranged from September 5 to June 2, with durations of 112-260 days, whereas inactivity periods detected from activity data extended from September 6 to May 13, lasting 83-217 days. Our comparison of activity-based and GPS-based methods indicates that bears may arrive at the den site several weeks before the onset of inactivity, with timing varying among demographic groups. ConclusionWe show that activity-based analysis provides a robust framework for estimating denning phenology, distinguishing actual inactivity from site presence, and improving understanding of the timing and variability of bear denning behavior. Applying an individual-level activity-based method improves accuracy in assessing ecological mechanisms underlying hibernation in bears and other hibernators, while also enhancing interpretation of environmental drivers and providing a reliable tool to monitor phenological shifts in response to climate change.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Human footprint and forest disturbance reduce space use of brown bears across Europe.

Three-quarters of the planets land surface has been altered by humans, with consequences for animal ecology, movements and related ecosystem functioning. Species often occupy wide geographical ranges with contrasting human disturbance and environmental conditions, yet, limited data availability across species ranges has constrained our understanding of how human impact and resource availability jointly shape intraspecific variation of animal space use. Leveraging a unique dataset of 752 annual GPS movement trajectories from 370 brown bears (Ursus arctos) across the species range in Europe, we investigated the effects of human impact (i.e., human footprint index), resource availability, forest cover and disturbance, and area-based conservation measures on brown bear space use. We quantified space use at different spatio-temporal scales during the growing season (May - September): home range size; representing general space requirements, 10-day long-distance displacement distances, and routine 1-day displacement distances. We found large intraspecific variation in brown bear space use across all scales, which was profoundly affected by human footprint index, vegetation productivity, and recent forest disturbances creating opportunity for resource pulses. Bears occupied smaller home ranges and moved less in more anthropized landscapes and in areas of higher resource availability. Forest disturbances reduced space use while contiguous forest cover promoted longer daily movements. The amount of strictly protected and roadless areas within bear home ranges were too small to affect space use. Anthropized landscapes may hinder the expansion of small and isolated populations, such as the Apennine and Pyrenean, and obstruct population connectivity, for example between the Alpine or Carpathian with the Dinaric Pindos populations. Our findings call for actions to maintain bear movements across landscapes with high human footprint, for example by maintaining forest integrity, to support viable bear populations and their ecosystem functions.

ecology↗

Trophic adaptation of large terrestrial omnivores to global change

Large omnivores at the top of food webs play a key role in ecosystems, as their ability to feed on multiple trophic levels stabilizes food-web dynamics and impacts ecosystem functioning. However, it is largely unexplored how large omnivores adapt their trophic interactions to altered resource availability under global change, particularly in terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we combine macroecological and paleoecological approaches and reveal that extant bears, the largest terrestrial omnivores, adapt their trophic position in food webs dynamically to net primary productivity and growing season length. Throughout their geographic ranges, extant bears occupy higher trophic positions in unproductive ecosystems with short growing seasons than in productive ecosystems with long growing seasons. Consistent with this geographic pattern, the trophic position of the brown bear sharply decreased at the transition from the Late Pleistocene to the Holocene, coinciding with an increase in net primary productivity and growing season length. These findings demonstrate that trophic interactions of omnivores are not static but change dynamically in response to environmental change. Our findings suggest that global change impacts on primary production and vegetation seasonality may trigger shifts in the functional role of omnivores, with consequences for food webs and ecosystem functions. Significance statementLarge omnivores play a key role in ecosystems, as they stabilize food-web dynamics and impact ecosystem functioning. However, how omnivores adapt their trophic interactions to changes in resource availability under global change remains unexplored. Combining macroecological and paleoecological approaches, we show that extant bears, the largest terrestrial omnivores, occupy lower trophic positions in food webs as net primary productivity and growing season length increase. This trophic adaptation is evident across the geographic ranges of all extant terrestrial bear species and for brown bears at the transition from the Late Pleistocene to the Holocene. Therefore, impacts of global change on primary production and vegetation seasonality may trigger shifts in the functional role of omnivores, with consequences for food webs and ecosystems. One sentence summaryGlobal changes in primary productivity and vegetation seasonality alter the functional role of large omnivores in terrestrial ecosystems.

ecology↗

The ontogeny of individual specialization

Individual dietary specialization, where individuals occupy a subset of a populations wider dietary niche, is a key factor determining a species resilience against environmental change. However, the ontogeny of individual specialization, as well as associated underlying social learning, genetic, and environmental drivers, remain poorly understood. Using a multigenerational dataset of female European brown bears (Ursus arctos) followed since birth, we discerned the relative contributions of environmental similarity, genetic heritability, maternal effects, and offspring social learning from the mother to individual specialization. Individual specialization accounted for 43% of phenotypic variation and spanned half a trophic position, with individual diets ranging from omnivorous to carnivorous. The main determinants of dietary specialization were social learning during rearing (13%), environmental similarity (9%), maternal effects (11%), and permanent between-individual effects (8%), whereas the contribution of genetic heritability was negligible. The trophic position of offspring closely resembled the trophic position of their mothers during the first 3-4 years of independence, but this relationship ceased with increasing time since separation. Our study shows that social learning and maternal effects are as important for individual dietary specialization as environmental composition. We propose a tighter integration of social effects into future studies of range expansion and habitat selection under global change that, to date, are mostly explained by environmental drivers.

ecology↗

Including biotic interactions in species distribution models improves the understanding of species niche: a case of study with the brown bear in Europe

Biotic interactions are expected to influence species responses to climate change, but they are usually not included when predicting future range shifts. We assessed the importance of biotic interactions to understand future consequences of climate and land use change for biodiversity using as a model system the brown bear (Ursus arctos) in Europe. By including biotic interactions using the spatial variation of energy contribution and habitat models of each food species, we showed that the use of biotic factors considerably improves our understanding of the distribution of brown bears. Predicted future range shifts, which included changes in the distribution of food species, varied greatly when considering various scenarios of change in biotic factors, warning about future indirect climate change effects. Our study confirmed that advancing our understanding of ecological networks of species interactions will improve future scenarios of biodiversity change, which is key for conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services.

ecology↗

Room without a view - den construction in relation to body size in brown bears.

Hibernation is an adaptive strategy to survive harsh winter conditions and food shortage. The use of well-insulated winter dens helps animals minimize energy loss during hibernation. Brown bears (Ursus arctos) commonly use excavated dens for hibernation. Physical properties of excavated dens, such as the amount of space between a bear and the inner wall, wall/roof thickness, and bedding materials, are expected to impact heat retention and energy conservation of bears. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of physical properties of excavated dens on energy conservation in hibernating bears. Our hypothesis was that bears excavate dens in a way to minimize heat loss and optimize energy conservation during hibernation. We predicted that physical properties of excavated dens would significantly affect the bears post-hibernation body condition. To test our hypothesis and prediction, we analyzed data collected from brown bears in Sweden with linear mixed effects models, examining (i) what factors affect den-excavation behavior and (ii) if physical properties of excavated dens affect post-hibernation body condition. We found that bears excavated a den cavity in relation to their body size, that older bears tended to excavate better-fitting den cavities compared to young bears, and that the physical properties of excavated dens did not significantly affect a bears post-hibernation body condition. Older bears excavated better-fitting den cavities, suggesting a potentially experience-based shift with age in den-excavation behavior and an optimum cavity size relative to a bears body size. The strong year effect shown by the most parsimonious model for post-hibernation body condition suggests that variations in physical properties of excavated dens are possibly negligible, compared to the large annual variations in biotic and abiotic factors affecting pre-hibernation body condition and heat loss during hibernation.

ecology↗