bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Young, A. I.

Publications and source records attributed to Young, A. I..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Novel estimators for family-based genome-wide association studies increase power and robustness

A goal of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) is to estimate the causal effects of alleles carried by an individual on that individual ( direct genetic effects). Typical GWAS designs, however, are susceptible to confounding due to gene-environment correlation and non-random mating (population stratification and assortative mating). Family-based GWAS, in contrast, is robust to such confounding since it uses random, within-family genetic variation. When both parents are genotyped, a regression controlling for parental genotype provides the most powerful approach. However, parental genotypes are often missing. We have previously shown that imputing the genotypes of missing parent(s) can increase power for estimation of direct genetic effects over using genetic differences between siblings. We extend the imputation method, which previously only applied to samples with at least one genotyped sibling or parent, to singletons (individuals without any genotyped relatives). By including singletons, the effective sample size for estimation of direct effects can be increased by up to 50%. We apply this method to 408,254 White British individuals from the UK Biobank, obtaining an effective sample size increase of between 25% and 43% (depending upon phenotype) by including 368,629 singletons. While this approach maximizes power, it can be biased when there is strong population structure. We therefore introduce an imputation based estimator that is robust to population structure and more powerful than other robust estimators. We implement our estimators in the software package snipar using an efficient linear-mixed model (LMM) specified by a sparse genetic relatedness matrix. We examine the bias and variance of different family-based and standard GWAS estimators theoretically and in simulations with differing levels of population structure, enabling researchers to choose the appropriate approach depending on their research goals.

genetics↗

Family Analysis with Mendelian Imputations

Genotype-phenotype associations can be results of direct effects, genetic nurturing effects and population stratification confounding. Genotypes from parents and siblings of the proband can be used to statistically disentangle these effects. To maximize power, a comprehensive framework for utilizing various combinations of parents and siblings genotypes is introduced. Central to the approach is mendelian imputation, a method that utilizes identity by descent (IBD) information to non-linearly impute genotypes into untyped relatives using genotypes of typed individuals. Applying the method to UK Biobank probands with at least one parent or sibling genotyped, for an educational attainment (EA) polygenic score that has an R2 of 5.7% with EA, its predictive power based on direct genetic effect alone is demonstrated to be only about 1.4%. For women, the EA polygenic score has a bigger estimated direct effect on age-at-first-birth than EA itself.

genetics↗

Mendelian imputation of parental genotypes for genome-wide estimation of direct and indirect genetic effects

Associations between genotype and phenotype derive from four sources: direct genetic effects, indirect genetic effects from relatives, population stratification, and correlations with other variants affecting the phenotype through assortative mating. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of unrelated individuals have limited ability to distinguish the different sources of genotype-phenotype association, confusing interpretation of results and potentially leading to bias when those results are applied – in genetic prediction of traits, for example. With genetic data on families, the randomisation of genetic material during meiosis can be used to distinguish direct genetic effects from other sources of genotype-phenotype association. Genetic data on siblings is the most common form of genetic data on close relatives. We develop a method that takes advantage of identity-by-descent sharing between siblings to impute missing parental genotypes. Compared to no imputation, this increases the effective sample size for estimation of direct genetic effects and indirect parental effects by up to one third and one half respectively. We develop a related method for imputing missing parental genotypes when a parent-offspring pair is observed. We provide the imputation methods in a software package, SNIPar (single nucleotide imputation of parents), that also estimates genome-wide direct and indirect effects of SNPs. We apply this to a sample of 45,826 White British individuals in the UK Biobank who have at least one genotyped first degree relative. We estimate direct and indirect genetic effects for ∼5 million genome-wide SNPs for five traits. We estimate the correlation between direct genetic effects and effects estimated by standard GWAS to be 0.61 (S.E. 0.09) for years of education, 0.68 (S.E. 0.10) for neuroticism, 0.72 (S.E. 0.09) for smoking initiation, 0.87 (S.E. 0.04) for BMI, and 0.96 (S.E. 0.01) for height. These results suggest that GWAS based on unrelated individuals provides an inaccurate picture of direct genetic effects for certain human traits.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

genetics↗

Estimating heritability without environmental bias

Heritability measures the proportion of trait variation that is due to genetic inheritance. Measurement of heritability is of importance to the nature-versus-nurture debate. However, existing estimates of heritability could be biased by environmental effects. Here we introduce relatedness disequilibrium regression (RDR), a novel method for estimating heritability. RDR removes environmental bias by exploiting variation in relatedness due to random segregation. We use a sample of 54,888 Icelanders with both parents genotyped to estimate the heritability of 14 traits, including height (55.4%, S.E. 4.4%) and educational attainment (17.0%, S.E. 9.4%). Our results suggest that some other estimates of heritability could be inflated by environmental effects.

genetics↗

The nature of nurture: effects of parental genotypes

Sequence variants in the parental genomes that are not transmitted to a child/proband are often ignored in genetic studies. Here we show that non-transmitted alleles can impact a child through their effects on the parents and other relatives, a phenomenon we call genetic nurture. Using results from a meta-analysis of educational attainment, the polygenic score computed for the non-transmitted alleles of 21,637 probands with at least one parent genotyped has an estimated effect on the educational attainment of the proband that is 29.9% (P = 1.6x10-14) of that of the transmitted polygenic score. Genetic nurturing effects of this polygenic score extend to other traits. Paternal and maternal polygenic scores have similar effects on educational attainment, but mothers contribute more than fathers to nutrition/heath related traits.\n\nOne Sentence SummaryNurture has a genetic component, i.e. alleles in the parents affect the parents phenotypes and through that influence the outcomes of the child.

genetics↗