bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Yin, M. T.

Publications and source records attributed to Yin, M. T..

14 recordsLinked to original sources

ACE-2-like Enzymatic Activity in Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Monoclonal Antibodies

Many people with acute COVID-19 have clinical disease not clearly attributable to viral replication and many COVID-19 convalescents are affected by post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC, or long COVID, LC). LC has severely affected public health and economies worldwide. Features of LC including blood pressure dysregulation, coagulopathies, high levels of inflammation, and neuropsychiatric complaints. The mechanisms responsible for the pathogenesis of some of COVID-19s clinical features and LC have not been well established. The host cell receptor for SARS-CoV-2 is human angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which binds the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain (RBD) to initiate infection. We hypothesized that some people may produce anti-RBD antibodies that sufficiently resemble ACE2 structure to have ACE2-like catalytic activity after infection. Those antibodies, ACE2-like abzymes, may contribute to the pathogenesis of LC. Our previous studies showed that ACE2-like activity was associated with immunoglobulin in some acute and convalescent COVID-19 patients. ACE2-like catalytic activity correlated with blood pressure changes following a moderate exercise challenge in people convalescing from COVID-19. To further establish that ACE2-like activity could be attributed to antibodies, we screened human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein from 3 different research centers and others purchased from a commercial source for ACE2-like catalytic activity. We identified 4 human monoclonal antibodies with ACE2-like catalytic activity. The ACE2-like catalytic activity of these mAbs was not inhibited by MLN-4760, a compound that inhibits native human ACE2 catalytic activity, nor by EDTA, unlike native ACE2, a Zinc metalloprotease, but was inhibited by an overlapping pool of spike peptides. Enzyme kinetic studies showed that the mAbs had substantially lower Vmax and Km values than native ACE2. The data therefore suggested that the antibodies cleave ACE2 substrate via a different mechanism than native ACE2. The identification of specific mAbs with ACE2-like catalytic activity supports the hypothesis that antibodies induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection could help mediate the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and LC, and more generally, the hypothesis that catalytic antibodies induced by infectious agents can contribute to disease pathogenesis.

microbiology↗

LP.8.1-directed COVID-19 mRNA vaccines boost neutralizing antibodies and mitigate ancestral immune imprinting

As SARS-CoV-2 evolves, it evades existing immunity elicited by exposure to earlier strains of the virus. In response, vaccine manufacturers have updated COVID-19 vaccines annually since 2022, though immune imprinting to the ancestral strain has blunted antibody responses to modern viral variants. In early 2025, the JN.1 subvariant LP.8.1 was dominant and manufacturers updated mRNA vaccine formulations to target LP.8.1 (LP.8.1 MV). However, by late 2025, other subvariants were dominant (XFG and NB.1.8.1) or emerging (e.g., PE.1.4, BA.3.2, PY.1.1.1) around the world. It is critical to understand the extent to which updated vaccine boosters elicit titers against both their target strain and recent variants. Further, it is important to quantify the extent to which immune imprinting continues to shape antiviral immune responses. Using pseudoviruses, we measured neutralizing antibody titers against a panel of 11 SARS-CoV-2 variants in serum samples from 36 adult participants in the United States before and approximately 1 month after LP.8.1 MV booster. We found that neutralizing antibody titers were substantially increased by the boost, with the greatest increases elicited against LP.8.1 and XFG. For the first time since 2022, post-boost titers were higher against the homologous vaccine target (LP.8.1) than against D614G (representing the ancestral strain). Combined, these results indicate that ancestral immune imprinting is mitigated to the greatest extent observed to date by LP.8.1 MV. Lastly, for a subset of participants, we measured neutralizing titers at approximately 4 months post-booster and found that LP.8.1-directed antibody titers were durable, with an estimated average half-life of approximately 66 days.

microbiology↗

Antibody evasion and receptor binding of SARS-CoV-2 LP.8.1.1, NB.1.8.1, XFG, and related subvariants

SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, causing repeated waves of infections around the world. It is critical to understand the features of the virus that explain its growth advantages. Recently, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron JN.1 subvariants KP.3.1.1 and XEC were outcompeted by later JN.1 progenies, most prominently LP.8.1 and LP.8.1.1. Other recent JN.1 subvariants, such as LF.7.2.1, which became prevalent in Asia, and MC.10.1, have also been under monitoring. Subsequently, NB.1.8.1 and XFG subvariants began increasing in prevalence, as well. We found that serum neutralizing antibody titers against LP.8.1, LP.8.1.1, LF.7, LF.7.2.1, MC.10.1 were similar to XEC in a cohort of 20 KP.2-based monovalent mRNA vaccine (KP.2 MV) recipients and in a cohort 20 adults who did not receive KP.2 MV. NB.1.8.1 and XFG were more evasive of serum neutralization than LP.8.1.1. We then characterized subvariant susceptibility to monoclonal antibody (mAb) neutralization using a panel of 12 mAbs spanning several epitopes on the SARS-CoV-2 spike, and found that LP.8.1 and XFG, MC.10.1 and NB.1.8.1, and LF.7.2.1 evade different classes of mAbs relative to earlier JN.1 subvariants, even if the tested polyclonal serum neutralizing antibody titers were not different overall. Next, we found that the receptor-binding affinity of LP.8.1 to ACE2 was the highest among the tested viruses, while that of LF.7.2.1 was lowest. Therefore, unlike most prior SARS-CoV-2 sublineage evolutionary trajectories, receptor-binding affinity, possibly reflecting enhanced transmissibility-and not increased antibody evasion-better explained the rise of LP.8.1, while the expansion of NB.1.8.1 and XFG again appear correlated with their enhanced antibody evasion.

microbiology↗

Do Existing COVID-19 Vaccines Need to Be Updated in 2025?

COVID-19 vaccines have been updated each year since 2022 to improve protection against evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants. However, it is unclear whether a reformulation will be necessary for 2025. KP.2-based monovalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (KP.2 MV) were authorized for use in 2024, and they conferred substantial protection against hospitalizations caused by viral variants that emerged and dominated later, such as KP.3.1.1 and XEC. Today, LP.8.1 and its subvariant LP.8.1.1 have become dominant worldwide, particularly so in North America. Other variants, such as the LF.7 subvariant LF.7.2.1, have emerged with a growth advantage in Asia. To characterize the antigenicity of LP.8.1, LP.8.1.1, LF.7, LF.7.2.1, and another variant under monitoring, MC.10.1, we tested serum samples from 20 individuals who recently received KP.2 MV in neutralization assays against JN.1, KP.2, KP.3, KP.3.1.1, XEC, LP.8.1, LP.8.1.1, LF.7, LF.7.2.1, or MC.10.1 pseudoviruses. Serum neutralizing antibody titers against LP.8.1, LP.8.1.1, LF.7, LF.7.2.1, and MC.10.1 were comparable to those against KP.3.1.1 and XEC, indicating that LP.8.1.1 and other recently dominant subvariants are antigenically similar to their predecessors. Therefore, the currently authorized KP.2 MV may not need to be updated for 2025, if the vaccine manufacturers could demonstrate comparable immunogenicity for KP.2 MV and LP.8.1-based mRNA vaccines and, of course, in the absence of an antigenically divergent SARS-CoV-2 variant emerging.

microbiology↗

Distinct CD8+ T-cell types Associated with COVID-19 Severity in Unvaccinated HLA-A2+ Patients

Although emerging data have revealed the critical role of memory CD8+ T cells in preventing and controlling SARS-CoV-2 infection, virus-specific CD8+ T-cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 and its memory and innate-like subsets in unvaccinated COVID-19 patients with various disease manifestations in an HLA-restricted fashion remain to be understood. Here, we show the strong association of protective cellular immunity with mild COVID-19 and unique cell types against SARS-CoV-2 virus in an HLA-A2 restricted manner. ELISpot assays reveal that SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T-cell responses in mild COVID-19 patients are significantly higher than in severe patients, whereas neutralizing antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 virus significantly correlate with disease severity. Single-cell analyses of HLA-A2-restricted CD8+ T cells, which recognize highly conserved immunodominant SARS-CoV-2-specific epitopes, demonstrate divergent profiles in unvaccinated patients with mild versus severe disease. CD8+ T-cell types including cytotoxic KLRB1+ CD8 cells with innate-like T-cell signatures, IFNGhiID3hi memory cells and IL7R+ proliferative stem cell-like memory cells are preferentially observed in mild COVID-19, whereas distinct terminally-differentiated T-cell subsets are predominantly detected in severe COVID-19: highly activated FASLhi T-cell subsets and early-terminated or dysfunctional IL4R+ GATA3+ stem cell-like memory T-cell subset. In conclusion, our findings suggest that unique and contrasting SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T-cell profiles may dictate COVID-19 severity. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=143 SRC="FIGDIR/small/632164v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (25K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@154796corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@efca24org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c01b9corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@54ad83_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOGraphical abstract.C_FLOATNO SARS-CoV-2 epitope-specific CD8+ T-cell subtypes associated with mild or severe COVID-19 patients. Potent memory CD8+ T-cell subtypes with gene signature in mild COVID-19 patients (upper) and dysfunctional CD8+ T-cell subtypes with gene signature in severe COVID-19 patients (lower). C_FIG

immunology↗

KP.2-based monovalent mRNA vaccines robustly boost antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2

In response to the ongoing evolution of SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were recently updated to encode the spike protein of the KP.2 subvariant of the JN.1 sublineage. However, the immunogenicity of KP.2-based monovalent mRNA vaccines (KP.2 MV) has yet to be fully evaluated and reported, particularly against dominant and growing viral variants KP.3.1.1 and XEC, which bear some distinct mutations from KP.2. Here we report that KP.2 MV boosters elicit robust neutralizing antibody titers in a cohort of 16 healthy adult participants against all tested variants in pseudovirus neutralization assays. The highest post-boost geometric mean titers were against older variants D614G (17,293) and BA.5 (14,358), suggestive of immune imprinting, but the post-boost titers against currently dominant or growing viruses KP.3.1.1 (1,698) and XEC (1,721) were still robust. Fold-changes in titers were highest against recent JN.1 subvariants, including JN.1, KP.2, KP.3, KP.3.1.1, and XEC, (5.8-to-7.8-fold), compared to older variants D614G and BA.5 (1.6- and 2.5-fold), which suggests that KP.2 MV boosters have at least partially mitigated immune imprinting. Overall, these results show that KP.2 MV boosters elicit robust neutralizing antibodies against dominant SARS-CoV-2 viruses.

microbiology↗

Antibody evasiveness of SARS-CoV-2 subvariants KP.3.1.1 and XEC

SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve and spread around the world, and it remains critical to understand the functional consequences of mutations that lead to dominant viral variants. KP.3.1.1 is currently the most prevalent subvariant worldwide, while the recombinant subvariant XEC is exhibiting the fastest growth rate. Here we measured the in vitro neutralization of KP.3.1.1 and XEC by human sera, monoclonal antibodies, and soluble hACE2 receptor relative to their parental subvariants KP.3 and JN.1. KP.3.1.1 and XEC were slightly more resistant (1.3-1.6-fold) than KP.3 to serum neutralization, and the resultant antigenic map showed that the new subvariants are antigenically similar. Both also demonstrated greater resistance to neutralization by select monoclonal antibodies and soluble hACE2, all of which target the top of the viral spike. Our findings suggested that upward motion of the receptor-binding domain in spike is partially hindered by the N-terminal-domain mutations found KP.3.1.1 and XEC, thereby allowing these subvariants to better evade serum antibodies that target the viral spike when it is in the up position and thus having a growth advantage in the population.

microbiology↗

A First-in-Class Dual Degrader of Bcl-2/Bcl-xL Reverses HIV Latency and Eliminates Ex Vivo Reservoirs

The persistence of latent HIV-1 proviruses in CD4+ T cells is a major obstacle to curing HIV. The "shock and kill" strategy involves reversing latency with latency-reversing agents (LRAs) and selectively inducing cell death in infected cells. However, current LRAs have shown limited efficacy in eliminating the ex vivo HIV reservoir. We repurposed PZ703b, a pro-apoptotic protein degrader initially developed for anti-leukemia therapy, to target HIV eradication. PZ703b induced degradation of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, activating the non-canonical NF-kB pathway and caspases cascade, resulting in latency reversal and selective apoptosis of infected cells. Treatment of ex vivo CD4+ T cells from ART-suppressed HIV-1 patients achieved a [~]50% reduction in the replication-competent reservoir. Our study provides proof-of-concept for using protein degraders to reverse HIV latency and induce cell death, highlighting PZ703bs potential in HIV cure strategies. This approach may pave the way for novel therapeutic interventions aimed at eliminating the HIV-inducible reservoir.

molecular biology↗

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5 subvariants evolved to extend antibody evasion

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/5 have surged dramatically to become dominant in the United States and South Africa, respectively1,2. These novel subvariants carrying additional mutations in their spike proteins raise concerns that they may further evade neutralizing antibodies, thereby further compromising the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutic monoclonals. We now report findings from a systematic antigenic analysis of these surging Omicron subvariants. BA.2.12.1 is only modestly (1.8-fold) more resistant to sera from vaccinated and boosted individuals than BA.2. However, BA.4/5 is substantially (4.2-fold) more resistant and thus more likely to lead to vaccine breakthrough infections. Mutation at spike residue L452 found in both BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/5 facilitates escape from some antibodies directed to the so-called class 2 and 3 regions of the receptor-binding domain3. The F486V mutation found in BA.4/5 facilitates escape from certain class 1 and 2 antibodies but compromises the spike affinity for the viral receptor. The R493Q reversion mutation, however, restores receptor affinity and consequently the fitness of BA.4/5. Among therapeutic antibodies authorized for clinical use, only bebtelovimab retains full potency against both BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/5. The Omicron lineage of SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, successively yielding subvariants that are not only more transmissible but also more evasive to antibodies.

microbiology↗

Antibody Evasion Properties of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Sublineages

The identification of the Omicron variant (B.1.1.529.1 or BA.1) of SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) in Botswana in November 20211 immediately raised alarms due to the sheer number of mutations in the spike glycoprotein that could lead to striking antibody evasion. We2 and others3-6 recently reported results in this Journal confirming such a concern. Continuing surveillance of Omicron evolution has since revealed the rise in prevalence of two sublineages, BA.1 with an R346K mutation (BA.1+R346K) and B.1.1.529.2 (BA.2), with the latter containing 8 unique spike mutations while lacking 13 spike mutations found in BA.1. We therefore extended our studies to include antigenic characterization of these new sublineages. Polyclonal sera from patients infected by wild-type SARS-CoV-2 or recipients of current mRNA vaccines showed a substantial loss in neutralizing activity against both BA.1+R346K and BA.2, with drops comparable to that already reported for BA.12,3,5,6. These findings indicate that these three sublineages of Omicron are antigenically equidistant from the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and thus similarly threaten the efficacies of current vaccines. BA.2 also exhibited marked resistance to 17 of 19 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies tested, including S309 (sotrovimab)7, which had retained appreciable activity against BA.1 and BA.1+R346K2-4,6. This new finding shows that no presently approved or authorized monoclonal antibody therapy could adequately cover all sublineages of the Omicron variant.

microbiology↗

Striking Antibody Evasion Manifested by the Omicron Variant of SARS-CoV-2

The Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) was only recently detected in southern Africa, but its subsequent spread has been extensive, both regionally and globally1. It is expected to become dominant in the coming weeks2, probably due to enhanced transmissibility. A striking feature of this variant is the large number of spike mutations3 that pose a threat to the efficacy of current COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) vaccines and antibody therapies4. This concern is amplified by the findings from our study. We found B.1.1.529 to be markedly resistant to neutralization by serum not only from convalescent patients, but also from individuals vaccinated with one of the four widely used COVID-19 vaccines. Even serum from persons vaccinated and boosted with mRNA-based vaccines exhibited substantially diminished neutralizing activity against B.1.1.529. By evaluating a panel of monoclonal antibodies to all known epitope clusters on the spike protein, we noted that the activity of 17 of the 19 antibodies tested were either abolished or impaired, including ones currently authorized or approved for use in patients. In addition, we also identified four new spike mutations (S371L, N440K, G446S, and Q493R) that confer greater antibody resistance to B.1.1.529. The Omicron variant presents a serious threat to many existing COVID-19 vaccines and therapies, compelling the development of new interventions that anticipate the evolutionary trajectory of SARS-CoV-2.

microbiology↗

Increased Resistance of SARS-CoV-2 Variants B.1.351 and B.1.1.7 to Antibody Neutralization

The COVID-19 pandemic has ravaged the globe, and its causative agent, SARS-CoV-2, continues to rage. Prospects of ending this pandemic rest on the development of effective interventions. Single and combination monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics have received emergency use authorization1-3, with more in the pipeline4-7. Furthermore, multiple vaccine constructs have shown promise8, including two with ~95% protective efficacy against COVID-199,10. However, these interventions were directed toward the initial SARS-CoV-2 that emerged in 2019. The recent emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.1.7 in the UK11 and B.1.351 in South Africa12 is of concern because of their purported ease of transmission and extensive mutations in the spike protein. We now report that B.1.1.7 is refractory to neutralization by most mAbs to the N-terminal domain (NTD) of spike and relatively resistant to a few mAbs to the receptor-binding domain (RBD). It is not more resistant to convalescent plasma or vaccinee sera. Findings on B.1.351 are more worrisome in that this variant is not only refractory to neutralization by most NTD mAbs but also by multiple individual mAbs to the receptor-binding motif on RBD, largely due to an E484K mutation. Moreover, B.1.351 is markedly more resistant to neutralization by convalescent plasma (9.4 fold) and vaccinee sera (10.3-12.4 fold). B.1.351 and emergent variants13,14 with similar spike mutations present new challenges for mAb therapy and threaten the protective efficacy of current vaccines.

immunology↗

Potent Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies Directed to Multiple Epitopes on the SARS-CoV-2 Spike

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic rages on with devasting consequences on human lives and the global economy1,2. The discovery and development of virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies could be one approach to treat or prevent infection by this novel coronavirus. Here we report the isolation of 61 SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies from 5 infected patients hospitalized with severe disease. Among these are 19 antibodies that potently neutralized the authentic SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, 9 of which exhibited exquisite potency, with 50% virus-inhibitory concentrations of 0.7 to 9 ng/mL. Epitope mapping showed this collection of 19 antibodies to be about equally divided between those directed to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and those to the N-terminal domain (NTD), indicating that both of these regions at the top of the viral spike are immunogenic. In addition, two other powerful neutralizing antibodies recognized quaternary epitopes that are overlapping with the domains at the top of the spike. Cryo-electron microscopy reconstructions of one antibody targeting RBD, a second targeting NTD, and a third bridging two separate RBDs revealed recognition of the closed, "all RBD-down" conformation of the spike. Several of these monoclonal antibodies are promising candidates for clinical development as potential therapeutic and/or prophylactic agents against SARS-CoV-2.

microbiology↗

SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Responses Are More Robust in Patients with Severe Disease

We studied plasma antibody responses of 35 patients about 1 month after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Titers of antibodies binding to the viral nucleocapsid and spike proteins were significantly higher in patients with severe disease. Likewise, mean antibody neutralization titers against SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus and live virus were higher in the sicker patients, by ~5-fold and ~7-fold, respectively. These findings have important implications for those pursuing plasma therapy, isolation of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, and determinants of immunity.

microbiology↗