bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Yau, J. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Yau, J. M..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Illusory cold desensitizes touch

In Jack Londons To Build a Fire, the doomed protagonist notes that "the tremendous cold had already driven the life out of his fingers... dead fingers could neither touch nor clutch". Indeed, our hands are numbed when exposed to cold, a desensitization process traditionally attributed to biophysical and physiological effects on mechanoreceptor and afferent responses1. Yet, perception is not based solely on sensory inputs and often reflects prior beliefs and expectations2. Accordingly, the mere experience of coldness, given its association with tactile desensitization, conceivably modulates touch independent of physical effects. We dissociated the physical and subjective influences of cooling on touch by leveraging the Thermal Referral Illusion3-7, in which cooling of the index and ring fingers induces an illusory perception of coldness that is referred to the middle finger which did not experience local cooling. We found that both veridical and illusory cold elevated tactile detection thresholds. Threshold shifts scaled with subjective ratings of cold intensity which varied with thermal adaptation. Thermal referral induction did not result in changes to skin temperature, ruling out indirect physical effects on the tested finger. To account for cold effects on touch, we implemented a computational model incorporating both physical and subjective factors by simulating changes in tactile afferent spiking activity8 and modulation of decision computations, respectively. The model reproduced empirical cooling effects on afferent responses9 and recapitulated psychophysical detection patterns. Our results reveal that subjective thermal perception contributes to cold-induced attenuation of touch, highlighting how multimodal experiences and expectations shape somatosensation.

neuroscience↗

Signatures of vibration frequency tuning in human neocortex

The spectral content of vibrations produced in the skin conveys essential information about textures and underlies sensing through hand-held tools. Humans can perceive and discriminate vibration frequency, yet the central representation of this fundamental feature is unknown. Using fMRI, we discovered that cortical responses are tuned for vibration frequency. Voxel tuning was biased in a manner that reflects perceptual sensitivity and the response profile of the Pacinian afferent system. These results imply the existence of tuned populations that may encode naturalistic vibrations according to their constituent spectra.

neuroscience↗

Principles of tactile search over the body

Although we experience complex patterns over our entire body, how we selectively perceive multi-site touch over our bodies remains poorly understood. Here, we characterized tactile search behavior over the body using a tactile analog of the classic visual search task. Participants judged whether a target stimulus (e.g., 10-Hz vibration) was present or absent on the upper or lower limbs. When present, the target stimulus could occur alone or with distractor stimuli (e.g., 30-Hz vibrations) on other body locations. We varied the number and spatial configurations of the distractors as well as the target and distractor frequencies and measured the impact of these factors on search response times. First, we found that response times were faster on target-present trials compared to target-absent trials. Second, response times increased with the number of stimulated sites, suggesting a serial search process. Third, search performance differed depending on stimulus frequencies. This frequency-dependent behavior may be related to perceptual grouping effects based on timing cues. We constructed models to explore how the locations of the tactile cues influenced search behavior. Our modeling results reveal that, in isolation, cues on the index fingers make relatively greater contributions to search performance compared to stimulation experienced on other body sites. Additionally, co-stimulation of sites within the same limb or simply on the same body side preferentially influence search behavior. Our collective findings identify some principles of attentional search that are common to vision and touch, but others that highlight key differences that may be unique to body-based spatial perception. New & NoteworthyLittle is known about how we selectively experience multi-site touch over the body. Using a tactile analog of the classic visual search paradigm, we show that tactile search behavior for flutter cues is generally consistent with a serial search process. Modeling results reveal the preferential contributions of index finger stimulation and two-site interactions involving ipsilateral and within-limb patterns. Our results offer initial evidence for spatial and temporal principles underlying tactile search behavior over the body.

neuroscience↗

Multimodal frequency representations are embedded in modality-defined cortical sensory systems

Sensory information is represented and elaborated in hierarchical cortical systems that are thought to be dedicated to individual sensory modalities. This traditional view of sensory cortex organization has been challenged by recent evidence of multimodal responses in primary and association sensory areas. Although it is indisputable that sensory areas respond to multiple modalities, it remains unclear whether these multimodal responses reflect selective information processing for particular stimulus features. Here, we used fMRI adaptation to identify brain regions that are sensitive to the temporal frequency information contained in auditory, tactile, and audiotactile stimulus sequences. A number of brain regions distributed over the parietal and temporal lobes exhibited frequency-selective temporal response modulation for both auditory and tactile stimulus events, as indexed by repetition suppression effects. A smaller set of regions responded to crossmodal adaptation sequences in a frequency-dependent manner. Despite an extensive overlap of multimodal frequency-selective responses across the parietal and temporal lobes, representational similarity analysis revealed a cortical \"regional landscape\" that clearly reflected distinct somatosensory and auditory processing systems that converged on modality-invariant areas. These structured relationships between brain regions were also evident in spontaneous signal fluctuation patterns measured at rest. Our results reveal that multimodal processing in human cortex can be feature-specific and that multimodal frequency representations are embedded in the intrinsically hierarchical organization of cortical sensory systems.\n\nSignificance StatementA hallmark of traditional brain organization models is the segregation of signals from the different senses in modality-dedicated brain regions. Recent evidence showing multimodal activity in brain regions thought to be dedicated to a single modality have challenged the traditional sensory cortex model. Notably, few studies have explored the feature-specificity of multimodal responses found in sensory cortex. Here, we used fMRI adaptation to identify parietal and temporal cortex regions which exhibited sensitivity to both tactile and auditory frequency information. These univariate results demonstrate that multimodal processing in sensory cortex can be feature-specific. Using the same data, though, we found clear evidence of modality-based cortical organization estimated from multivariate response patterns and spontaneous BOLD signal fluctuations. Thus, our results reveal an embedding of feature-specific multimodal processing in traditionally-defined cortical systems.

neuroscience↗

Normalization models of cue combination in touch

Bimanual touch may require combining what is felt on the hands with where the hands are located in space. The computations supporting bimanual touch are poorly understood. We found that tactile cue combination patterns and their sensitivity to the locations of the hands differed according to the attended stimulus feature. These idiosyncratic perceptual patterns can be explained by distinct cue combination models that each involve divisive normalization, a canonical computation.

neuroscience↗

Selective attention gates the interactive crossmodal coupling between cortical sensory systems

Cortical sensory systems often activate in parallel, even when stimulation is experienced through a single sensory modality1-3. Critically, the functional relationship between coactivated cortical systems is unclear: Co-activations may reflect the interactive coupling between information-linked cortical systems or merely parallel but independent sensory processing. Here, we report causal evidence that human somatosensory cortex (S1), which co-activates with auditory cortex during the processing of vibrations and textures4-9, interactively couples to cortical systems that support auditory perception. Acute manipulation of S1 activity using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) impairs auditory frequency perception when subjects simultaneously attend to auditory and tactile frequency, but not when attention is directed to audition alone. Auditory frequency perception is unaffected by TMS over visual cortex thus confirming the privileged coupling between the somatosensory and auditory cortical systems in temporal frequency processing10-13. Our results provide a key demonstration that selective attention can enhance the functional coupling between cortical systems that support different sensory modalities. The gating of crossmodal coupling by selective attention may critically support multisensory interactions and feature-specific perception.\n\nAuthor ContributionsS.C. and J.M.Y. designed the study and wrote the manuscript. S.C. and M.S.R. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the final revisions of the manuscript.

neuroscience↗