bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Yashiro, E.

Publications and source records attributed to Yashiro, E..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Comprehensive ecosystem-specific 16S rRNA gene databases with automated taxonomy assignment (AutoTax) provide species-level resolution in microbial ecology

High-throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing is an essential method for studying the diversity and dynamics of microbial communities. However, this method is presently hampered by the lack of high-identity reference sequences for many environmental microbes in the public 16S rRNA gene reference databases, and by the absence of a systematic and comprehensive taxonomy for the uncultured majority. Here we demonstrate how high-throughput synthetic long-read sequencing can be applied to create ecosystem-specific full-length 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence variant (FL-ASV) reference databases that include high-identity references (>98.7% identity) for nearly all abundant bacteria (>0.01% relative abundance) using Danish wastewater treatment systems and anaerobic digesters as an example. In addition, we introduce a novel sequence identity-based approach for automated taxonomy assignment (AutoTax) that provides a complete seven-rank taxonomy for all reference sequences, using the SILVA taxonomy as a backbone, with stable placeholder names for unclassified taxa. The FL-ASVs are perfectly suited for the evaluation of taxonomic resolution and bias associated with primers commonly used for amplicon sequencing, allowing researchers to choose those that are ideal for their ecosystem. The AutoTax taxonomy greatly improves the classification of short-read 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) at the genus- and species-level, compared to the commonly used universal reference databases. Importantly, the placeholder names provide a way to explore the unclassified environmental taxa at different taxonomic ranks, which in combination with in situ analyses can be used to uncover their ecological roles.

microbiology

Soil protist diversity in the Swiss western Alps is better predicted by topo-climatic than by edaphic variables

AimGeneral trends in spatial patterns of macroscopic organisms diversity can be reasonably well predicted from correlative models, using for instance topo-climatic variables for plants and animals allowing inference over large scales. By contrast, soil microorganisms diversity is generally considered as mostly driven by edaphic variables and, therefore, difficult to extrapolate on a large spatial scale based on predictive models. Here, we compared the power of topo-climatic vs. edaphic variables for predicting the diversity of various soil protist groups at the regional scale.\n\nLocationSwiss western Alps.\n\nTaxaFull protist community and nine clades belonging to three functional groups: parasites (Apicomplexa, Oomycota, Phytomyxea), phagotrophs (Sarcomonadea, Tubulinea, Spirotrichea) and phototrophs (Chlorophyta, Trebouxiophyceae, Bacillariophyta).\n\nMethodsWe extracted soil environmental DNA from 178 sites along a wide range of elevations with a random-stratified sampling design. We defined protist Operational Taxonomic Units assemblages by metabarcoding of the V4 region of the ribosomal RNA small sub-unit gene. We assessed and modelled the diversity (Shannon index) patterns of all selected groups as a function of topo-climatic and edaphic variables using Generalized Additive Models.\n\nResultsThe respective significance of topo-climatic and edaphic variables varied among taxonomic and - to a certain extent - functional groups: while many variables explained significantly the diversity of phototrophs this was less the case for parasites. Generally, topo-climatic variables had a better predictive power than edaphic variables, yet predictive power varied among taxonomic and functional groups.\n\nMain conclusionsTopo-climatic variables are, on average, better predictors of protist diversity at the landscape scale than edaphic variables, which opens the way to wide-scale sampling designs avoiding costly and time-consuming laboratory protocols. However, predictors of diversity differ considerably among taxonomic and functional groups; such relationships may be due to direct and/or indirect, e.g. biotic influences. Future prospects include using such spatial models to predict hotspots of diversity or pathogens outbreaks.

ecology