Biology subjects

Yamaguchi, T. N.

Publications and source records attributed to Yamaguchi, T. N..

13 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Somatic evolution of prostate cancer: mutation, selection, and epistasis across disease stages

BackgroundSomatic mutations involved in prostate cancer tumorigenesis and disease progression have been identified, but their evolutionary dynamics--including differential selective pressures across oncogenesis and metastatic spread--remain poorly understood. No prior study has systematically quantified the adaptive landscape from prostate organogenesis through tumor initiation and progression to metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), nor characterized the selective epistatic interactions that structure this evolutionary trajectory. Methods and FindingsTo address this gap, we analyzed 2,704 low- and high-risk primary tumors and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers to quantify the mutation rates, mutational processes, and scaled selection coefficients of somatic mutations across disease stages. Trinucleotide mutational patterns were stable, but both mutation load and mutation rates increased with progression. In parallel, selective pressures on specific somatic mutations changed substantially, revealing a dynamic adaptive landscape. Stage-specific selective effects were associated with significant synergistic and antagonistic selective epistasis among key driver genes. Early selection on SPOP mutations in the BRD3 binding domain were under strong positive selection, and they increased selection for subsequent RHOA mutations while decreasing selection for TP53 mutations. Antagonistic selective epistasis was evident between mutations of CUL3 and both SPOP and PIK3CA. Mutations in KMT2C increased the selection for mutations in TP53, consistent with their frequent co-occurrence. Synergistic epistatic interactions between mutations of PTEN and both PIK3CA and AR support a strong therapeutic rationale for combined inhibition of PI3K/AR pathway in PTEN-deficient prostate cancers. ConclusionsThese findings provide a comprehensive map of the evolving selective and epistatic forces that shape prostate cancer progression across clinical stages. By distinguishing shifts in selection from changes in mutation rate and revealing the extents of cooperative and conflicting relationships among driver mutations, our work identifies critical points of vulnerability and informs that design of therapeutic strategies that anticipate and intercept the somatic evolutionary trajectory of prostate cancer.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2025

RNA Transcripts Serve as a Template for Double-Strand Break Repair in Human Cells

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are toxic lesions that lead to genome instability. While canonical DSB repair pathways typically operate independently of RNA, emerging evidence suggests that RNA:DNA hybrids and transcripts near damaged sites can influence repair outcomes. However, a direct role for transcript RNA as a template during DSB repair in human cells is yet to be established. In this study, we designed fluorescent- and sequencing-based assays, which demonstrated that RNA-containing oligonucleotides and messenger RNA serve as templates to promote DSB repair. We conducted a CRISPR/Cas9-based genetic screen to identify factors that promote RNA-templated DSB repair (RT-DSBR), and of the candidate polymerases, we identified DNA polymerase-zeta (Pol{zeta}) as the potential reverse transcriptase that facilitates RT-DSBR. Furthermore, by analyzing sequencing data from cancer genomes, we identified the presence of whole intron deletions, a unique genomic scar reflective of RT-DSBR activity generated when spliced mRNA serves as the repair template. These findings highlight RT-DSBR as an alternative pathway for repairing DSBs in transcribed genes, with potential mutagenic consequences.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2025

The Landscape of Prostate Tumour Methylation

Prostate cancer is characterized by profound clinical and molecular heterogeneity. While its genomic heterogeneity is well-characterized, its epigenomic heterogeneity remains less understood. We therefore created a compendium of 3,001 multi-ancestry prostate methylomes spanning normal tissue through localized disease of all grades to poly-metastatic disease. A subset of 884 samples had multi-omic DNA and/or RNA characterization. We identify four epigenomic subtypes that risk-stratify patients and reflect distinct evolutionary trajectories. We demonstrate extensive regulatory interplay between DNA copy number and methylation, with transcriptional consequences that vary across genes and disease stages. We define epigenetic dysregulation signatures for 15 important clinico-molecular features, creating predictive models for each. For example, we identify specific epigenetic features that predict patient outcome and are synergistic with clinical prognostic features. These results define a complex interplay between tumour genetics and epigenetics that converges to modify gene-expression programs and clinical presentation, in part through modulation of epigenetic aging.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2024

A robust benchmark for detecting low-frequency variants in the HG002 Genome In A Bottle NIST reference material.

Somatic mosaicism is an important cause of disease, but mosaic and somatic variants are often challenging to detect because they exist in only a fraction of cells. To address the need for benchmarking subclonal variants in normal cell populations, we developed a benchmark containing mosaic variants in the Genome in a Bottle Consortium (GIAB) HG002 reference material DNA from a large batch of a normal lymphoblastoid cell line. First, we used a somatic variant caller with high coverage (300x) Illumina whole genome sequencing data from the Ashkenazi Jewish trio to detect variants in HG002 not detected in at least 5% of cells from the combined parental data. These candidate mosaic variants were subsequently evaluated using >100x BGI, Element, and PacBio HiFi data. High confidence candidate SNVs with variant allele fractions above 5% were included in the HG002 draft mosaic variant benchmark, with 13/85 occurring in medically relevant gene regions. We also delineated a 2.45 Gbp subset of the previously defined germline autosomal benchmark regions for HG002 in which no additional mosaic variants >2% exist, enabling robust assessment of false positives. The variant allele fraction of some mosaic variants is different between batches of cells, so using data from the homogeneous batch of reference material DNA is critical for benchmarking these variants. External validation of this mosaic benchmark showed it can be used to reliably identify both false negatives and false positives for a variety of technologies and detection algorithms, demonstrating its utility for optimization and validation. By adding our characterization of mosaic variants in this widely-used cell line, we support extensive benchmarking efforts using it in simulation, spike-in, and mixture studies.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2024

StableLift: Optimized Germline and Somatic Variant Detection Across Genome Builds

Reference genomes are foundational to modern genomics. Our growing understanding of genome structure leads to continual improvements in reference genomes and new genome "builds" with incompatible coordinate systems. We quantified the impact of genome build on germline and somatic variant calling by analyzing tumour-normal whole-genome pairs against the two most widely used human genome builds. The average individual had a build-discordance of 3.8% for germline SNPs, 8.6% for germline SVs, 25.9% for somatic SNVs and 49.6% for somatic SVs. Build-discordant variants are not simply false-positives: 47% were verified by targeted resequencing. Build-discordant variants were associated with specific genomic and technical features in variant- and algorithm-specific patterns. We leveraged these patterns to create StableLift, an algorithm that predicts cross-build stability with AUROCs of 0.934 {+/-} 0.029. These results call for significant caution in cross-build analyses and for use of StableLift as a computationally efficient solution to mitigate inter-build artifacts.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2024

Metapipeline-DNA: A Comprehensive Germline & Somatic Genomics Nextflow Pipeline

SummaryThe price, quality and throughout of DNA sequencing continue to improve. Algorithmic innovations have allowed inference of a growing range of features from DNA sequencing data, quantifying nuclear, mitochondrial and evolutionary aspects of both germline and somatic genomes. To automate analyses of the full range of genomic characteristics, we created an extensible Nextflow meta-pipeline called metapipeline-DNA. Metapipeline-DNA analyzes targeted and whole-genome sequencing data from raw reads through pre-processing, feature detection by multiple algorithms, quality-control and data- visualization. Each step can be run independently and is supported robust software engineering including automated failure-recovery, robust testing and consistent verifications of inputs, outputs and parameters. Metapipeline-DNA is cloud-compatible and highly configurable, with options to subset and optimize each analysis. Metapipeline-DNA facilitates high-scale, comprehensive analysis of DNA sequencing data. AvailabilityMetapipeline-DNA is an open-source Nextflow pipeline under the GPLv2 license and is available at https://github.com/uclahs-cds/metapipeline-DNA.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2024

moPepGen: Rapid and Comprehensive Proteoform Identification

Proteogenomics is limited by challenges of modeling the complexities of gene expression. We create moPepGen, a graph-based algorithm that comprehensively generates non-canonical peptides in linear time. moPepGen works with multiple technologies, in multiple species and on all types of genetic and transcriptomic data. In human cancer proteomes, it enumerates previously unobservable noncanonical peptides arising from germline and somatic genomic variants, noncoding open reading frames, RNA fusions and RNA circularization.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2022

Germline determinants of the prostate tumor genome

A persons germline genome strongly influences their risk of developing cancer. Yet the molecular mechanisms linking the host genome to the specific somatic molecular phenotypes of individual cancers are largely unknown. We quantified the relationships between germline polymorphisms and somatic mutational features in prostate cancer. Across 1,991 prostate tumors, we identified 23 co-occurring germline and somatic events in close 2D or 3D spatial genomic proximity, affecting 10 cancer driver genes. These driver quantitative trait loci (dQTLs) overlap active regulatory regions, and shape the tumor epigenome, transcriptome and proteome. Some dQTLs are active in multiple cancer types, and information content analyses imply hundreds of undiscovered dQTLs. Specific dQTLs explain at least 16.7% ancestry-biases in rates of TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions and 67.3% of ancestry-biases in rates of FOXA1 point mutations. These data reveal extensive influences of common germline variation on somatic mutational landscapes.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2021

The Telomere Length Landscape of Localized Prostate Cancer

Replicative immortality is a hallmark of cancer, and can be achieved through telomere lengthening and maintenance. We report telomere lengths (TLs) of 392 localized prostate cancer tumours and characterize their relationship to genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic features. Shorter tumour TLs were associated with elevated genomic instability, including single-nucleotide variants, indels and structural variants. Genes involved in cell proliferation and signaling were correlated with tumour TL at all levels of the central dogma. TL was also associated with multiple clinical features of a tumour. Longer TLs in non-tumour samples were associated with a lower rate of biochemical relapse after definitive local therapy. Our analysis integrates multi-omics data to illuminate the relationship of specific genomic alterations in a tumour and TL in prostate cancer. Although the role of telomere length in cancer has been well studied, its association to genomic features is less well known. We describe the multi-level integration of telomere length, genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics in localized prostate cancer. Patient Summary We examined the association between telomere length and multiple omics-level data in prostate cancer. We observed that traditional telomere mutations are rare in prostate cancer and that telomere length is associated with multiple measure of genomic instability.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2018

Accurate Reference-Free Somatic Variant-Calling by Integrating Genomic, Sequencing and Population Data

The detection of somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) is critical in both research and clinical applications. Studies of human cancer typically use matched normal (reference) samples from a distant tissue to increase SNV prediction accuracy. This process both doubles sequencing costs and poses challenges when reference samples are not readily available, such as for many cell-lines. To address these challenges, we created S22S: an approach for the prediction of somatic mutations without need for matched reference tissue. S22S takes underlying sequence data, augments them with genomic background context and population frequency information, and classifies SNVs as somatic or non-somatic. We validated S22S using primary tumor/normal pairs from four tumor types, spanning two different sequencing technologies. S22S robustly identifies somatic SNVs, with the area under the precision recall curve reaching 0.97 in kidney clear cell carcinoma, comparable to the best tumor/normal analysis pipelines. S22S is freely available at http://labs.oicr.on.ca/Boutros-lab/software/s22s.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Valection: Design Optimization for Validation and Verification Studies

BackgroundPlatform-specific error profiles necessitate confirmatory studies where predictions made on data generated using one technology are additionally verified by processing the same samples on an orthogonal technology. In disciplines that rely heavily on high-throughput data generation, such as genomics, reducing the impact of false positive and false negative rates in results is a top priority. However, verifying all predictions can be costly and redundant, and testing a subset of findings is often used to estimate the true error profile. To determine how to create subsets of predictions for validation that maximize inference of global error profiles, we developed Valection, a software program that implements multiple strategies for the selection of verification candidates.\n\nResultsTo evaluate these selection strategies, we obtained 261 sets of somatic mutation calls from a single-nucleotide variant caller benchmarking challenge where 21 teams competed on whole-genome sequencing datasets of three computationally-simulated tumours. By using synthetic data, we had complete ground truth of the tumours mutations and, therefore, we were able to accurately determine how estimates from the selected subset of verification candidates compared to the complete prediction set. We found that selection strategy performance depends on several verification study characteristics. In particular the verification budget of the experiment (i.e. how many candidates can be selected) is shown to influence estimates.\n\nConclusionsThe Valection framework is flexible, allowing for the implementation of additional selection algorithms in the future. Its applicability extends to any discipline that relies on experimental verification and will benefit from the optimization of verification candidate selection.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2017

Combining accurate tumour genome simulation with crowd sourcing to benchmark somatic structural variant detection

BackgroundThe phenotypes of cancer cells are driven in part by somatic structural variants. Structural variants can initiate tumors, enhance their aggressiveness and provide unique therapeutic opportunities. Whole-genome sequencing of tumors can allow exhaustive identification of the specific structural variants present in an individual cancer, facilitating both clinical diagnostics and the discovery of novel mutagenic mechanisms. A plethora of somatic structural variant detection algorithms have been created to enable these discoveries, however there are no systematic benchmarks of them. Rigorous performance evaluation of somatic structural variant detection methods has been challenged by the lack of gold-standards, extensive resource requirements and difficulties arising from the need to share personal genomic information.\n\nResultsTo facilitate structural variant detection algorithm evaluations, we create a robust simulation framework for somatic structural variants by extending the BAMSurgeon algorithm. We then organize and enable a crowd-sourced benchmarking within the ICGC-TCGA DREAM Somatic Mutation Calling Challenge (SMC-DNA). We report here the results of structural variant benchmarking on three different tumors, comprising 204 submissions from 15 teams. In addition to ranking methods, we identify characteristic error-profiles of individual algorithms and general trends across them. Surprisingly, we find that ensembles of analysis pipelines do not always outperform the best individual method, indicating a need for new ways to aggregate somatic structural variant detection approaches.\n\nConclusionsThe synthetic tumors and somatic structural variant detection leaderboards remain available as a community benchmarking resource, and BAMSurgeon is available at https://github.com/adamewing/bamsurgeon.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2017

Germline Contamination and Leakage in Whole Genome Somatic Single Nucleotide Variant Detection

BackgroundThe clinical sequencing of cancer genomes to personalize therapy is becoming routine across the world. However, concerns over patient re-identification from these data lead to questions about how tightly access should be controlled. It is not thought to be possible to re-identify patients from somatic variant data. However, somatic variant detection pipelines can mistakenly identify germline variants as somatic ones, a process called \"germline leakage\". The rate of germline leakage across different somatic variant detection pipelines is not well-understood, and it is uncertain whether or not somatic variant calls should be considered re-identifiable. To fill this gap, we quantified germline leakage across 259 sets of whole-genome somatic single nucleotide variant (SNVs) predictions made by 21 teams as part of the ICGC-TCGA DREAM Somatic Mutation Calling Challenge.\n\nResultsThe median somatic SNV prediction set contained 4,325 somatic SNVs and leaked one germline polymorphism. The level of germline leakage was inversely correlated with somatic SNV prediction accuracy and positively correlated with the amount of infiltrating normal cells. The specific germline variants leaked differed by tumour and algorithm. To aid in quantitation and correction of leakage, we created a tool, called GermlineFilter, for use in public-facing somatic SNV databases.\n\nConclusionsThe potential for patient re-identification from leaked germline variants in somatic SNV predictions has led to divergent open data access policies, based on different assessments of the risks. Indeed, a single, well-publicized re-identification event could reshape public perceptions of the values of genomic data sharing. We find that modern somatic SNV prediction pipelines have low germline-leakage rates, which can be further reduced, especially for cloud-sharing, using pre-filtering software.

genomics↗