Wutke, S. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2026

A near chromosome-scale genome assembly of the Common pine sawfly (Diprion pini, Linnaeus, 1758)

The common pine sawfly, Diprion pini, is a widespread defoliator of pine forests across Europe and Asia, with outbreaks causing substantial ecological and economic damages. However, genomic resources for this species have been limited, hindering advances in molecular ecology or pest management. Here, we present a near chromosome-level reference genome for D.pini, generated using PacBio HiFi reads, Oxford Nanopore MionION long reads, and 10x Genomics linked reads. The final assembly is organized into mostly chromosome-sized scaffolds. It spans a length of 268 Mb, comprises 81 scaffolds, and has a scaffold N50 of 18.7 Mb. BUSCO analysis (hymenoptera_odb10) indicates a high genome completeness of 97.2%. With 22,7 kb the mitochondrial genome is unusually large due to an extended non-coding control region (6,874 bp). Gene prediction identified 26,335 protein-coding genes, of which 12,769 were functionally annotated. Comparative analyses with other sawflies and Apocrita identified 2,472 proteins unique to D. pini, some of which are putatively associated with the processing of plant secondary metabolites. Notably, our genome assembly highlights that, when a closely related, high-quality reference genome is available, chromosome-scale assemblies can be generated without the need of Hi-C sequencing. The genome provides a valuable foundation for the development of improved monitoring and management strategies for D. pini outbreaks and contributes to advancing fundamental research on Hymenoptera evolution.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2025

Direct and indirect benefits of cooperation in collective defense against predation

The evolution and maintenance of public goods cooperation, despite cheating, remains a key interest in social biology. Identifying how ecological factors determine the direct and indirect benefits that maintain cooperation has proven challenging, as these can vary significantly across species and environments. Here, we study this problem using the social pine sawfly Neodiprion sertifer (Hymenoptera) as a model system. During their larval stage, N. sertifer live in groups and collectively secrete a defensive fluid against predators. This behavior comprises a public good as it is costly to exhibit and beneficial to others, and individuals vary in their contribution to group defense. We experimentally manipulated individual contributions to defense to assess how these influence survival under natural insect predation. Our results indicate that defense has a group-level benefit as individuals were more likely to survive in cooperative groups with a higher proportion of defending larvae. Moreover, being able to deploy defensive fluid confers direct survival benefits. Genetic and phenotypic analyses of natural populations further show that kin selection promotes collective defense, as groups of larvae are often composed of full siblings. We also find that the contribution to defense is female-biased and diminishes in larger, more male-biased groups, and to some extent with decreased kinship, indicating that individuals adjust their contributions based on social context. Overall, we find that contribution to the collective defense provides both direct and indirect benefits and that individuals regulate their contributions mainly based on the social environment, resulting in variation within and among natural populations. Significance statementIndividuals in groups can cooperate to achieve shared goals, but they face an evolutionary challenge: if the benefits of cooperation are shared equally, freeloaders receive the same benefits as others while contributing less. Although theoretical solutions to this problem are abundant, we still lack empirical evidence on how those mechanisms function in natural systems. We study this with pine sawfly larvae, which defend collectively against predators. We show that while cooperation increases the survival of individuals and their relatives, they adjust their contributions based on who and how many they are surrounded by, relying more on freeloading in larger and male-biased groups. This results in variation in cooperativeness but prevents freeloaders from taking over.

evolutionary biology↗