Biology subjects

Wudzinska, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Wudzinska, A..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Ancient co-option of LTR retrotransposons as yeast centromeres

The evolutionary origins of the genetic point centromere in the brewers yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a member of the order Saccharomycetales, are still unknown. Competing hypotheses suggest that the point centromere tripartite genetic centromere DNA elements (CDEs) either evolved from ancestral epigenetic centromeres by descent with modification or were gained through horizontal transfer from selfish DNA plasmids.1,2 Here, we identified centromeres in the sister order Saccharomycodales and termed them "proto-point centromeres" due to sequence features that bridge the evolutionary gap between point centromeres and ancestral centromeres types. Comparative genomic analyses across multiple yeast orders showed an unexpected evolutionary link between point and proto-point centromeres to the long terminal repeats (LTRs) of Ty5 retrotransposons. Strikingly, one Saccharomycodales species, Saccharomycodes ludwigii, harbors compact Ty5-based centromeres, where its CDEII elements are divergent AT-rich Ty5 LTRs. These living fossil centromeres show how retrotransposon cis-regulation was likely co-opted for genetic centromere specification. These insights show that point centromeres are direct descendants of retrotransposons and have evolved by descent with modification. Ultimately, the many diverse centromere types across the yeast subphylum may share a common ancestry rooted in retrotransposon activity.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Human macroH2A1 drives nucleosome dephasing and genome instability in histone-humanized yeast

In addition to replicative histones, eukaryotic genomes encode a repertoire of non-replicative variant histones providing additional layers of structural and epigenetic regulation. Here, we systematically replaced individual replicative human histones with non-replicative human variant histones using a histone replacement system in yeast. Variants H2A.J, TsH2B, and H3.5 complemented for their respective replicative counterparts. However, macroH2A1 failed to complement and its expression was toxic in yeast, negatively interacting with native yeast histones and kinetochore genes. To isolate yeast with "macroH2A1 chromatin" we decoupled the effects of its macro and histone fold domains, which revealed that both domains sufficed to override native yeast nucleosome positioning. Furthermore, both modified constructs of macroH2A1 exhibited lower nucleosome occupancy that correlated with decreased short-range chromatin interactions (<20 Kb), disrupted centromeric clustering, and increased chromosome instability. While supporting viability, macroH2A1 dramatically alters chromatin organization in yeast, leading to genome instability and massive fitness defects.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2022

Germline Transmission of a Circular Human Artificial Chromosome in the Mouse

Although the structure and function of the alphoid-tetO Human Artificial Chromosome (tetO-HAC) has been previously described in cell culture models and somatically in the mouse, in vivo persistence and stability throughout meiosis and across generations were not evaluated. Here we report germline transmission of a circular tetO-HAC across three mouse generations without observable health or reproductive deficiencies. Furthermore, we show that the tetO-HAC is maintained without selection as an episome and can be efficiently transmitted by both ova and sperm.

synthetic biology↗

bioRxiv2021

The genetic basis of tail-loss evolution in humans and apes

The loss of the tail is one of the main anatomical evolutionary changes to have occurred along the lineage leading to humans and to the "anthropomorphous apes"1,2. This morphological reprogramming in the ancestral hominoids has been long considered to have accommodated a characteristic style of locomotion and contributed to the evolution of bipedalism in humans3-5. Yet, the precise genetic mechanism that facilitated tail-loss evolution in hominoids remains unknown. Primate genome sequencing projects have made possible the identification of causal links between genotypic and phenotypic changes6-8, and enable the search for hominoid-specific genetic elements controlling tail development9. Here, we present evidence that tail-loss evolution was mediated by the insertion of an individual Alu element into the genome of the hominoid ancestor. We demonstrate that this Alu element - inserted into an intron of the TBXT gene (also called T or Brachyury10-12) - pairs with a neighboring ancestral Alu element encoded in the reverse genomic orientation and leads to a hominoid-specific alternative splicing event. To study the effect of this splicing event, we generated a mouse model that mimics the expression of human TBXT products by expressing both full-length and exon-skipped isoforms of the mouse TBXT ortholog. We found that mice with this genotype exhibit the complete absence of a tail or a shortened tail, supporting the notion that the exon-skipped transcript is sufficient to induce a tail-loss phenotype, albeit with incomplete penetrance. We further noted that mice homozygous for the exon-skipped isoforms exhibited embryonic spinal cord malformations, resembling a neural tube defect condition, which affects [~]1/1000 human neonates13. We propose that selection for the loss of the tail along the hominoid lineage was associated with an adaptive cost of potential neural tube defects and that this ancient evolutionary trade-off may thus continue to affect human health today.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2019

BRCA1 Mediated Homologous Recombination and S Phase DNA Repair Pathways Restrict LINE-1 Retrotransposition in Human Cells

Long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1 or L1) is the only autonomous retrotransposon active in human cells. L1s DNA makes about 17% of the human genome and retrotransposition of a few active L1 copies has been detected in various tumors, underscoring the potential role of L1 in mediating or increasing genome instability during tumorigenic development. Different host factors have been shown to influence L1 mobility through several mechanisms. However, systematic analyses of host factors affecting L1 retrotransposition are limited. Here, we developed a high-throughput microscopy-based retrotransposition assay and coupled it to a genome-wide siRNA knockdown screen to study the cellular regulators of L1 retrotransposition in human cells. We showed that L1 insertion frequency was stimulated by knockdown of Double-Stranded Break (DSB) repair factors that are active in the S/G2 phase of the cell cycle including Homologous Recombination (HR), Fanconi Anemia (FA) and, to a less extent, microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) factors. In particular, we show that BRCA1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase with a key role in several DNA repair pathways, plays multiple roles in regulating L1; BRCA1 knockdown directly affects L1 retrotransposition frequency and structure and also plays a role in controlling L1 ORF2 protein translation through L1 mRNA binding. These results suggest the existence of a \"battle\" between HR factors and L1 retrotransposons, revealing a potential role for L1 in development of tumors characterized by BRCA1 and HR repair deficiencies.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2017

LINE-1 and the cell cycle: protein localization and functional dynamics

LINE-1/L1 retrotransposon sequences comprise 17% of the human genome. Among the many classes of mobile genetic elements, L1 is the only autonomous retrotransposon that still drives human genomic plasticity today. Through its co-evolution with the human genome, L1 has intertwined itself with host cell biology to aid its proliferation. However, a clear understanding of L1s lifecycle and the processes involved in restricting its insertion and its intragenomic spreading remains elusive. Here we identify modes of L1 proteins entrance into the nucleus, a necessary step for L1 proliferation. Using functional, biochemical, and imaging approaches, we also show a clear cell cycle bias for L1 retrotransposition that peaks during the S phase. Our observations provide a basis for novel interpretations about the nature of nuclear and cytoplasmic L1 ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) and the potential role of DNA replication in L1 retrotransposition.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Dissection of purified LINE-1 reveals distinct nuclear and cytoplasmic intermediates

1.Long Interspersed Nuclear Element-1 (LINE-1, L1) is a mobile genetic element active in human genomes. L1-encoded ORF1 and ORF2 proteins bind L1 RNAs, forming ribonucleoproteins (RNPs). These RNPs interact with diverse host proteins, some repressive and others required for the L1 lifecycle. Using differential affinity purifications and quantitative mass spectrometry, we have characterized the proteins associated with distinctive L1 macromolecular complexes. Our findings support the presence of multiple L1-derived retrotransposition intermediates in vivo. Among them, we describe a cytoplasmic intermediate that we hypothesize to be the canonical ORF1p/ORF2p/L1-RNA-containing RNP, and we describe a nuclear population containing ORF2p, but lacking ORF1p, which likely contains host factors participating in template-primed reverse transcription.

molecular biology↗