Winters, A. D. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2020

Lack of evidence for microbiota in the placental and fetal tissues of rhesus macaques

The prevailing paradigm in obstetrics has been the sterile womb hypothesis. However, some are asserting that the placenta, intra-amniotic environment, and fetus harbor microbial communities. The objective of this study was to determine if the fetal and placental tissues of rhesus macaques harbor viable bacterial communities. Fetal, placental, and uterine wall samples were obtained from cesarean deliveries without labor ([~]130/166 days gestation). The presence of viable bacteria in the fetal intestine and placenta was investigated through culture. The bacterial burden and profile of the placenta, umbilical cord, and fetal brain, heart, liver, and colon were determined through quantitative real-time PCR and DNA sequencing. These data were compared with those of the uterine wall, as well as to negative and positive technical controls. Bacterial cultures of fetal and placental tissues yielded only a single colony of Cutibacterium acnes. This bacterium was detected at a low relative abundance (0.02%) in the 16S rRNA gene profile of the villous tree sample from which it was cultured, yet it was also identified in 12/29 background technical controls. The bacterial burden and profile of fetal and placental tissues did not exceed or differ from those of background technical controls. In contrast, the bacterial burden and profiles of positive controls exceeded and differed from those of background controls. Among the macaque samples, distinct microbial signals were limited to the uterine wall. Therefore, using multiple modes of microbiologic inquiry, there was not consistent evidence of viable bacterial communities in the fetal and placental tissues of rhesus macaques. IMPORTANCEMicrobial invasion of the amniotic cavity (i.e. intra-amniotic infection) has been causally linked to pregnancy complications, especially preterm birth. Therefore, if the placenta and the fetus are typically populated by low biomass yet viable microbial communities, current understanding of the role of microbes in reproduction and pregnancy outcomes will need to be fundamentally reconsidered. Could these communities be of benefit by competitively excluding potential pathogens or priming the fetal immune system for the microbial bombardment it will experience upon delivery? If so, what properties (e.g. microbial load, community membership) of these microbial communities preclude versus promote intra-amniotic infection? Given the ramifications of the in utero colonization hypothesis, critical evaluation is required. In this study, using multiple modes of microbiologic inquiry (i.e. culture, qPCR, DNA sequencing) and controlling for potential background DNA contamination, we did not find consistent evidence for microbial communities in the placenta and fetal tissues of rhesus macaques.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2019

No consistent evidence for microbiota in murine placental and fetal tissues

The existence of a placental microbiota and in utero colonization of the fetus has been the subject of recent debate. The objective of this study was to determine whether the placental and fetal tissues of mice harbor bacterial communities. Bacterial profiles of the placenta and fetal brain, lung, liver, and intestine were characterized through culture, qPCR, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. These profiles were compared to those of the maternal mouth, lung, liver, uterus, cervix, vagina, and intestine, as well as to background technical controls. Positive bacterial cultures from placental and fetal tissues were rare; of the 165 total bacterial cultures of placental tissues from the 11 mice included in this study, only nine yielded at least a single colony, and five of those nine positive cultures came from a single mouse. Cultures of fetal intestinal tissues yielded just a single bacterial isolate: Staphylococcus hominis, a common skin bacterium. Bacterial loads of placental and fetal brain, lung, liver, and intestinal tissues were not higher than those of DNA contamination controls and did not yield substantive 16S rRNA gene sequencing libraries. From all placental or fetal tissues (N = 49), there was only a single bacterial isolate that came from a fetal brain sample having a bacterial load higher than that of contamination controls and that was identified in sequence-based surveys of at least one of its corresponding maternal samples. Therefore, using multiple modes of microbiologic inquiry, there was not consistent evidence of bacterial communities in the placental and fetal tissues of mice. IMPORTANCEThe prevailing paradigm in obstetrics has been the sterile womb hypothesis, which posits that fetuses are first colonized by microorganisms during the delivery process. However, some are now suggesting that fetuses are consistently colonized by microorganisms in utero by microbial communities that inhabit the placenta and intra-amniotic environment. Given the established causal role of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (i.e. intra-amniotic infection) in pregnancy complications, especially preterm birth, if the in utero colonization hypothesis were true, there are several aspects of current understanding that will need to be reconsidered including the magnitude of intra-amniotic microbial load required to cause disease and their potential influence on the ontogeny of the immune system. However, acceptance of the in utero colonization hypothesis is premature. Herein, we do not find consistent evidence for placental and fetal microbiota in mice using culture, qPCR, and DNA sequencing.

microbiology↗