bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Williams, H. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Williams, H. E..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Myoelectric Prosthesis Control using Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network Regression Mitigates the Limb Position Effect

Although state-of-the-art myoelectric prostheses offer persons with upper limb amputation extensive movement capabilities, users have not been afforded a reliable means to control common movements required in daily living. Many proposed prosthesis controllers use pattern recognition, a method that learns and recognizes patterns of electromyographic (EMG) signals produced by the users residual limb muscles to predict and execute device movements. Such control becomes unreliable in high limb positions--a problem known as the limb position effect. Pattern recognition often uses a classification algorithm; simple to implement, but limits user-initiated control to only one device movement at a time, at a single speed. To combat position-related control deficiencies and classification controller constraints, we developed and tested two recurrent convolutional neural network (RCNN) pattern recognition-based solutions: (1) an RCNN classification controller that uses EMG plus positional inertial measurement unit (IMU) signals to offer one-speed, sequential movement control; and (2) an RCNN regression controller that uses the same data capture technique to offer simultaneous control of multiple movements and device movement velocity. We assessed both RCNN controllers by comparing them to a commonly used linear discriminant analysis classification controller (LDA-Baseline). Participants without upper limb impairment were recruited to perform multipositional tasks while wearing a simulated prosthesis. Both RCNN classification and regression controllers showed improved functional task performance over LDA-Baseline, in 11 and 38 out of 115 metrics, respectively. This work contributes an RCNN regression-based controller that provides accurate, simultaneous, and proportional movements to EMG-based technologies including prostheses, exoskeletons, and even muscle-activated video games.

bioengineering↗

A multifaceted suite of metrics for comparative myoelectric prosthesis controller research

Upper limb robotic (myoelectric) prostheses are technologically advanced, but challenging to use. In response, substantial research is being done to develop user-specific prosthesis controllers that can predict a persons intended movements. Most studies that test and compare new controllers rely on simple assessment measures such as task scores (e.g., number of objects moved across a barrier) or duration-based measures (e.g., overall task completion time). These assessment measures, however, fail to capture valuable details about: the quality of device arm movements; whether these movements match users intentions; the timing of specific wrist and hand control functions; and users opinions regarding overall device reliability and controller training requirements. In this work, we present a comprehensive and novel suite of myoelectric prosthesis control evaluation metrics that better facilitates analysis of device movement details--spanning measures of task performance, control characteristics, and user experience. As a case example of their use and research viability, we applied these metrics in real-time control experimentation. Here, eight participants without upper limb impairment compared device control offered by a deep learning-based controller (recurrent convolutional neural network-based classification with transfer learning, or RCNN-TL) to that of a commonly used controller (linear discriminant analysis, or LDA). The participants wore a simulated prosthesis and performed complex functional tasks across multiple limb positions. Analysis resulting from our suite of metrics identified 16 instances of a user-facing problem known as the "limb position effect". We determined that RCNN-TL performed the same as or significantly better than LDA in four such problem instances. We also confirmed that transfer learning can minimize user training burden. Overall, this study contributes a multifaceted new suite of control evaluation metrics, along with a guide to their application, for use in research and testing of myoelectric controllers today, and potentially for use in broader rehabilitation technologies of the future.

neuroscience↗

Color Data v2: a user-friendly, open-access database with hereditary cancer and hereditary cardiovascular conditions datasets

Publicly-available genetic databases promote data sharing and fuel scientific discoveries for the prevention, treatment, and management of disease. In 2018, we built Color Data, a user-friendly, open access database containing genotypic and self-reported phenotypic information from 50,000 individuals who were sequenced for 30 genes associated with hereditary cancer. In a continued effort to promote access to these types of data, we launched Color Data v2, an updated version of the Color Data database. This new release includes additional clinical genetic testing results from more than 18,000 individuals who were sequenced for 30 genes associated with hereditary cardiovascular conditions, as well as polygenic risk scores for breast cancer, coronary artery disease, and atrial fibrillation. In addition, we used self-reported phenotypic information to implement the following four clinical risk models: Gail Model for five-year risk of breast cancer, Claus Model for lifetime risk of breast cancer, simple office-based Framingham Coronary Heart Disease Risk Score for ten-year risk of coronary heart disease, and CHARGE-AF simple score for five-year risk of atrial fibrillation. These new features and capabilities are highlighted through two sample queries in the database. We hope that the broad dissemination of this data will help researchers continue to explore genotype-phenotype correlations and identify novel variants for functional analysis, enabling scientific discoveries in the field of population genomics. Database URL: https://data.color.com/

genetics↗

Gaze and Movement Assessment (GaMA): Inter-site validation of a visuomotor upper limb functional protocol

BackgroundSuccessful hand-object interactions require precise hand-eye coordination with continual movement adjustments. Quantitative measurement of this visuomotor behaviour could provide valuable insight into upper limb impairments. The Gaze and Movement Assessment (GaMA) was developed to provide protocols for simultaneous motion capture and eye tracking during the administration of two functional tasks, along with data analysis methods to generate standard measures of visuomotor behaviour. The objective of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of the GaMA protocol across two independent groups of non-disabled participants, with different raters using different motion capture and eye tracking technology.\n\nMethodsTwenty non-disabled adults performed the Pasta Box Task and the Cup Transfer Task. Upper body and eye movements were recorded using motion capture and eye tracking, respectively. Measures of hand movement, angular joint kinematics, and eye gaze were compared to those from a different sample of twenty non-disabled adults who had previously performed the same protocol with different technology, rater and site.\n\nResultsParticipants took longer to perform the tasks versus those from the earlier study, although the relative time of each movement phase was similar. Measures that were dissimilar between the groups included hand distances travelled, hand trajectories, number of movement units, eye latencies, and peak angular velocities. Similarities included all hand velocity and grip aperture measures, eye fixations, and most peak joint angle and range of motion measures.\n\nDiscussionThe reproducibility of GaMA was confirmed by this study, despite a few differences introduced by learning effects, task demonstration variation, and limitations of the kinematic model. The findings from this study provide confidence in the reliability of normative results obtained by GaMA, indicating it accurately quantifies the typical behaviours of a non-disabled population. This work advances the consideration for use of GaMA in populations with upper limb sensorimotor impairment.

neuroscience↗