bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Wilkie, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Wilkie, D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Ranking the direct threats to biodiversity in sub-Saharan Africa

Sub-Saharan Africa benefits from large investments in biodiversity conservation, yet there is no prioritization of the many direct threats to biodiversity available to inform organizations developing sub-Saharan or sub-regional conservation strategies. Consequently, regional investments by funders of biodiversity conservation such as international conservation organizations, foundations, and bilateral and multilateral donors may be suboptimal. To identify the priority threats to biodiversity in sub-Saharan Africa, we classified the direct threats to biodiversity using standardized threats categories and triangulated data from a Delphi consensus of sub-Saharan Africa biodiversity experts, known threats to IUCN Red-listed sub-Saharan African species, and National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans from 47 sub-Saharan African countries. After ranking the threats from each source and averaging the rankings, we find that the highest threats are: annual and perennial crops (non-timber); logging and wood harvesting (natural forests); fishing and harvesting aquatic resources (marine and freshwater); and hunting and collecting terrestrial animals. Within the sub-regions of sub-Saharan Africa there is considerable variation. The highest ranked threat in Central Africa is hunting. In East Africa, it is agriculture. In Southern Africa, it is invasive non-native/alien species, and in West Africa, agriculture and logging are tied as the highest threats. There are known ways to address all of these threats, and concentrating investments on these threats while accounting for unique socio-ecological contexts across sub-Saharan Africa is essential for the sustained conservation of biodiversity.

ecology

Genetic analysis identifies the Ostrea stentina/aupouria/equestris oyster species complex in Hawai'i, and resolves its lineage as the western Pacific O. equestris

BackgroundExtensive phenotypic plasticity in oysters makes them difficult to identify based on morphology alone, but their identities can be resolved by applying genetic and genomic technologies. In this study, we collected unknown oyster specimens from Hawaiian waters for genetic identification. MethodsWe sequenced two partial gene fragments, mitochondrial 16S ribosomal RNA (16S) and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), in 48 samples: 27 unidentified oyster specimens collected from two locations on O ahu, 13 known specimens from a hatchery in Hilo, Hawai i Island, and 8 known specimens from Hilo Bay, Hawai i Island. ResultsMolecular data identified approximately 85% of unknown samples as belonging to the Ostrea stentina/aupouria/equestris species complex, a globally distributed group with a history of uncertain and controversial taxonomic status. The remaining unknown samples were the native Dendostrea sandvichensis (G. B. Sowerby II, 1871), and nonnative Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793), the latter of which is a commercial species that was introduced to Hawai I from multiple sources during the 20th century. Phylogenetic analysis placed Hawai i Ostrea alongside samples from China, Japan, and New Zealand, grouping them within the recently classified western Pacific O. equestris. Until now, four extant species of true oyster have been documented in Hawai i. This study expands the known range of O. equestris by providing the first verification of its occurrence in Hawai i.

genetics