bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Wild, P. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Wild, P. J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning

The Gleason grading system remains the most powerful prognostic predictor for patients with prostate cancer since the 1960s. Its application requires highly-trained pathologists, is tedious and yet suffers from limited inter-pathologist reproducibility, especially for the intermediate Gleason score 7. Automated annotation procedures constitute a viable solution to remedy these limitations.\n\nIn this study, we present a deep learning approach for automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining. Our system was trained using detailed Gleason annotations on a discovery cohort of 641 patients and was then evaluated on an independent test cohort of 245 patients annotated by two pathologists. On the test cohort, the inter-annotator agreements between the model and each pathologist, quantified via Cohens quadratic kappa statistic, were 0.75 and 0.71 respectively, comparable with the inter-pathologist agreement (kappa=0.71). Furthermore, the models Gleason score assignments achieved pathology expert-level stratification of patients into prognostically distinct groups, on the basis of disease-specific survival data available for the test cohort.\n\nOverall, our study shows promising results regarding the applicability of deep learning-based solutions towards more objective and reproducible prostate cancer grading, especially for cases with heterogeneous Gleason patterns.

bioinformatics

Multi-region proteome analysis quantifies spatial heterogeneity of prostate tissue biomarkers

Many tumors are characterized by large genomic heterogeneity and it remains unclear to what extent this impacts on protein biomarker discovery. Here, we quantified proteome intra-tissue heterogeneity (ITH) based on a multi-region analysis of 30 biopsy-scale prostate tissues using pressure cycling technology and SWATH mass spectrometry. We quantified 8,248 proteins and analyzed the ITH of 3,700 proteins. The level of ITH varied significantly depending on proteins and tissue types. Benign tissues exhibited generally more complex ITH patterns than malignant tissues. Spatial variability of ten prostate biomarkers was further validated by immunohistochemistry in an independent cohort (n=83) using tissue microarrays. PSA was preferentially variable in benign prostatic hyperplasia, while GDF15 substantially varied in prostate adenocarcinomas. Further, we found that DNA repair pathways exhibited a high degree of variability in tumorous tissues, which may contribute to the genetic heterogeneity of tumors. This study conceptually adds a new perspective to protein biomarker discovery by quantifying spatial proteome variation and it demonstrates the feasibility by exploiting recent technological progress.

systems biology