bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Wilcockson, D. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Wilcockson, D. C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Circadian and circatidal oscillations of clock gene expression in brains of Eurydice pulchra and Parhyale hawaiensis.

Intertidal organisms, such as the crustaceans Eurydice pulchra and Parhyale hawaiensis, express daily and tidal rhythms of physiology and behaviour to adapt to their temporally complex environments. Although the molecular-genetic basis of the circadian clocks driving daily rhythms in terrestrial animals is well understood, the nature and mechanism of the circatidal clocks driving tidal rhythms remain a mystery. Using in situ hybridisation, we identified discrete clusters of [~]60 putative "clock" cells co-expressing canonical circadian clock genes with comparable distributions across the protocerebrum of E. pulchra and P. hawaiensis brains. In tidally rhythmic, field-collected E. pulchra sampled under a light:dark (LD) cycle, the expression of period (per) and cryptochrome 2 (cry2) exhibited daily rhythms in particular cell groups (e.g., medioposterior cells) whereas timeless (tim) showed 12-hour rhythms in others (e.g., medial cells). In tidally rhythmic laboratory-reared P. hawaiensis, previously entrained to 12.4-hour cycles of agitation under LD and sampled under continuous darkness, several cell groups (e.g., medioposterior cells) exhibited circadian expression of per and cry2. In contrast, dorsal-lateral cells in the protocerebrum exhibited robust [~]12-hour, i.e., circatidal, rhythms of per and cry2, phased to the prior tidal agitation but not the prior LD. In P. hawaiensis exhibiting daily behaviour under LD without tidal agitation, robust daily rhythms of per and cry2 expression were evident in medioposterior and other cells whereas expression in dorsal-lateral cells was not rhythmic, underlining their intrinsic tidal periodicity. These results implicate canonical circadian mechanisms in circatidal time-keeping and reveal conserved brain networks as potential neural substrates for the generation of interactive daily and tidal rhythms appropriate to intertidal habitats.

neuroscience↗

The circadian clock gene bmal1 is necessary for co-ordinated circatidal rhythms in the marine isopod Eurydice pulchra (Leach).

Circadian clocks in terrestrial animals are encoded by molecular feedback loops involving the negative regulators PERIOD, TIMELESS or CRYPTOCHROME2 and positive transcription factors CLOCK and BMAL1/CYCLE. The molecular basis of circatidal ([~]12.4 hour) or other lunar-mediated cycles ([~]15 day, [~]29 day), widely expressed in coastal organisms, is unknown. Disrupting circadian clockworks does not appear to affect lunar-based rhythms suggesting a molecular independence of the two cycles. Nevertheless, pharmacological inhibition of casein kinase 1 (CK1) that targets PERIOD stability in mammals and flies, affects both circadian and circatidal phenotypes in Eurydice pulchra (Ep), the speckled sea-louse. Here we show that these drug inhibitors of CK1 also affect the phosphorylation of EpCLK and EpBMAL1 and disrupt EpCLK-BMAL1-mediated transcription in Drosophila S2 cells, revealing a potential link between the positive circadian regulators and circatidal behaviour. We therefore performed dsRNAi knockdown of Epbmal1 as well as the major negative regulator in Eurydice, Epcry2. Epcry2 and Epbmal1 knockdown disrupted Eurydices circadian phenotypes as expected but in addition, circatidal behaviour was also sensitive to Epbmal1 knockdown. Thus three Eurydice negative circadian regulators, EpCRY2, in addition to EpPER and EpTIM, do not appear to be required for the expression of circatidal behaviour, in contrast to the positive regulator EpBMAL1. We suggest a neurogenetic model whereby the positive circadian regulators BMAL1-CLK are shared between circadian and circatidal mechanisms in Eurydice but circatidal rhythms require a novel, as yet unknown negative regulator.

genetics↗