Biology subjects

Wig, G. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Wig, G. S..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Systematic fMRI signal differences across cohorts alter lifespan connectome trajectories

Large-scale lifespan neuroimaging studies increasingly integrate data across distinct cohorts to characterize trajectories of brain development and aging. However, systematic differences in acquisition protocols and hardware across cohorts can alter signal characteristics in ways that bias downstream analyses. Here, we examine three cohorts from the Human Connectome Project (HCP), spanning development (HCP-D), young adulthood (HCP-YA) and aging (HCP-A), to illustrate this issue and evaluate existing strategies to mitigate it. HCP has set standards for open, deeply phenotyped, high-resolution human neuroimaging, which are frequently used as high-quality reference datasets in tool validation, replication studies, and cross-cohort meta-analyses. However, neuroimaging acquisitions have differed across HCP cohorts because of changes in scanner hardware and acquisition sequences across study phases. Because of HCPs widespread usage, even modest protocol differences between cohorts-and their downstream effects-can have outsized impacts on the field of neuroscience research. Our analysis reveals that the HCP-YA cohort exhibits systematically weaker temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR) relative to HCP-D/A. These signal quality discrepancies propagate to downstream analyses, leading to differences in overall resting-state functional correlations and whole-brain and node-level measures of resting-state network organization (e.g., system segregation, modularity, participation coefficient). Consistent with protocol-driven signal differences, resting-state network measures derived from HCP-YA depart from expected lifespan trajectories, as confirmed by examination of two other lifespan datasets. Harmonization approaches accounting for protocol and scanner-model differences substantially lessen these artifactual differences in brain network measures. Our findings underscore that signal differences do not merely introduce noise, but can qualitatively alter estimated lifespan trajectories of functional network organization, including partially inverting expected lifespan patterns. Without appropriate harmonization, analyses that combine HCP cohorts can therefore result in biologically misleading inferences about brain development and aging. We demonstrate how small acquisition differences bias resting-state-derived network metrics, and how these effects can be mitigated. This work advances best practices for valid inference in multi-cohort lifespan neuroscience research.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Less is More: Lower Levels of Task-Induced Hippocampal Activation Predict Better Performance on a Separate Verbal Memory Evaluation

Memories that differ in content or duration differ in the extent to which they depend on the hippocampus, and also the part of the hippocampus, posterior (pHPC) or anterior (aHPC), that they implicate. Inter-individual differences in learning-related activation in different hippocampal subregions have been found to predict specific differences in memory abilities. The complexity of these relationships creates a setting that is ripe for theoretically informative investigation, but that can also lead to reports of spurious relationships that do not reflect underlying neurobiological associations. Across-study replication is therefore a critical first step toward understanding how differences in hippocampal activity drive individual differences in memory ability. In the domain of verbal memory, Wig et al. (2008) identified a negative relationship between task-induced activation in pHPC and out-of-scanner verbal memory test performance. Replicating this result in an independent sample of 86 participants, we identified the same negative correlation between pHPC activation during a Lithuanian word learning task and out-of-scanner California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II) performance. This replication represents a critical step toward understanding how pHPC supports verbal memory by answering the basic question of whether the relationship can be reliably observed.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Parallel Hippocampal-Parietal Circuits for Self- and Goal-oriented Processing

The hippocampus is critically important for a diverse range of cognitive processes, such as episodic memory, prospective memory, affective processing, and spatial navigation. The human hippocampus has been thought of as being solely functionally connected to a set of neocortical regions known as the default mode network (DMN), which supports self-referential cognition. Using individual-specific precision functional mapping of resting state fMRI data, we found the anterior hippocampus (head and body) to be preferentially connected to the DMN as expected. The hippocampal tail, however, was strongly preferentially connected to the parietal memory network (PMN), which supports goal-oriented cognition and stimulus recognition. This resting state functional connectivity (RSFC) anterior-posterior dichotomy was well-matched by differences in task deactivations and anatomical segmentations of the hippocampus. Task deactivations were localized to the head and body of the hippocampus (DMN), relatively sparing the tail (PMN). Anterior and posterior hippocampal connectivity was network-specific even though the DMN and PMN are interdigitated in medial parietal cortex. The functional dichotomization of the hippocampus into anterior DMN-connected and posterior PMN-connected parcels suggests parallel, but distinct circuits between the hippocampus and medial parietal cortex for self vs. goal-oriented processing.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Removal of high frequency contamination from motion estimates in single-band fMRI saves data without biasing functional connectivity

Denoising fMRI data requires assessment of frame-to-frame head motion and removal of the biases motion introduces. This is usually done through analysis of the parameters calculated during retrospective head motion correction (i.e., motion parameters). However, it is increasingly recognized that respiration introduces factitious head motion via perturbations of the main (B0) field. This effect appears as higher-frequency fluctuations in the motion parameters (> 0.1 Hz, here referred to as HF-motion), primarily in the phase-encoding direction. This periodicity can sometimes be obscured in standard single-band fMRI (TR 2.0 - 2.5 s.) due to aliasing. Here we examined (1) how prevalent HF-motion effects are in seven single-band datasets with TR from 2.0 - 2.5 s and (2) how HF-motion affects functional connectivity. We demonstrate that HF-motion is relatively trait-like and more common in older adults, those with higher body mass index, and those with lower cardiorespiratory fitness. We propose a low-pass filtering approach to remove the contamination of high frequency effects from motion summary measures, such as framewise displacement (FD). We demonstrate that in most datasets this filtering approach saves a substantial amount of data from FD-based frame censoring, while at the same time reducing motion biases in functional connectivity measures. These findings suggest that filtering motion parameters is an effective way to improve the fidelity of head motion estimates, even in single band datasets. Particularly large data savings may accrue in datasets acquired in older and less fit participants. Highlights- Single-band fMRI motion traces show factitious high-frequency content (HF-motion) - The magnitude of HF-motion relates to age and other demographic factors - HF-motion elevates framewise displacement (FD) and causes data loss - Substantial fMRI data can be recovered from censoring by filtering motion traces - Filtering motion traces reduces motion artifacts in functional connectivity

neuroscience↗