Biology subjects

White, F. J.

Publications and source records attributed to White, F. J..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

Estimating Pan evolutionary history from nucleotide site patterns

Introgression appears increasingly ubiquitous in the evolutionary history of various taxa, including humans. However, accurately estimating introgression is difficult, particularly when 1) there are many parameters, 2) multiple models fit the data well, and 3) parameters are not simultaneously estimated. Here, we use the software Legofit to investigate the evolutionary history of bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (P. troglodytes) using whole genome sequences. This approach 1) ignores within-population variation, reducing the number of parameters requiring estimation, 2) allows for model selection, and 3) simultaneously estimates all parameters. We tabulated site patterns from the autosomes of 71 bonobos and chimpanzees representing all five extant Pan lineages. We then compared previously proposed demographic models and estimated parameters using a deterministic approach. We further considered sex bias in Pan evolutionary history by analyzing the site patterns from the X chromosome. Introgression from bonobos into the ancestor of eastern and central chimpanzees and from western into eastern chimpanzees best explained the autosomal site patterns. This second event was substantial with an estimated 0.21 admixture proportion. Estimates of effective population size and most divergence dates are consistent with previous findings; however, we observe a deeper divergence within chimpanzees at 987 ka. Finally, we identify male-biased reproduction in Pan evolutionary history and suggest that western to eastern chimpanzee introgression was driven by western males mating with eastern females.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2022

A Comparison Of Fecal Glucocorticoid Metabolite Concentration And Gut Microbiota Diversity In Bonobos (Pan paniscus)

Sex, age, diet, stress, and social environment have all been shown to influence the gut microbiota. In several mammals, including humans, increased stress is related to decreasing gut microbial diversity and may differentially impact specific taxa. Recent evidence from gorillas shows fecal glucocorticoid metabolite concentration (FGMC) did not significantly explain gut microbial diversity, but it was significantly associated with the abundance of the family Anaerolineaceae. These patterns have yet to be examined in other primates, like bonobos (Pan paniscus). We compared FGMC to 16S rRNA amplicons for 201 bonobo fecal samples collected across five months to evaluate the impact of stress, measured with FGMC, on the gut microbiota. Alpha diversity measures (Chaos and Shannons indexes) were not significantly related to FGMC. FGMC explained 0.08% of the variation in beta diversity for Jensen-Shannon and 1.27% for weighted UniFrac but was not significant for unweighted UniFrac. We found that genus SHD-231, a member of the family Anaerolinaceae had a significant positive relationship with FGMC. These results suggest that bonobos are relatively similar to gorillas in alpha diversity and family Anaerolinaceae responses to FGMC, but different from gorillas in beta diversity. Members of the family Anaerolinaceae may be differentially affected by FGMC across great apes. FGMC appears to be context dependent and may be species-specific for alpha and beta diversity but this study provides an example of consistent change in two African apes. Thus, the relationship between physiological stress and the gut microbiome may be difficult to predict, even among closely related species. Graphical Abstract: See PDF Legend: We compared the bonobo gut microbiota to fecal glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations (FGMC). FGMC did not explain alpha diversity, but FGMC explained [~]1.5% of the variation in beta diversity.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2020

Soft sweeps predominate recent positive selection in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)

Two modes of positive selection have been recognized: 1) hard sweeps that result in the rapid fixation of a beneficial allele typically from a de novo mutation and 2) soft sweeps that are characterized by intermediate frequencies of at least two haplotypes that stem from standing genetic variation or recurrent de novo mutations. While many populations exhibit both hard and soft sweeps throughout the genome, there is increasing evidence that soft sweeps, rather than hard sweeps, are the predominant mode of adaptation in many species, including humans. Here, we use a supervised machine learning approach to assess the extent of completed hard and soft sweeps in the closest living relatives of humans: bonobos and chimpanzees (genus Pan). We trained convolutional neural network classifiers using simulated data and applied these classifiers to population genomic data for 71 individuals representing all five extant Pan lineages, of which we successfully analyzed 60 individuals from four lineages. We found that recent adaptation in Pan is largely the result of soft sweeps, ranging from 73.1 to 97.7% of all identified sweeps. While few hard sweeps were shared among lineages, we found that between 19 and 267 soft sweep windows were shared by at least two lineages. We also identify novel candidate genes subject to recent positive selection. This study emphasizes the importance of shifts in the physical and social environment, rather than novel mutation, in shaping recent adaptations in bonobos and chimpanzees.

genomics↗