Whalley, H. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2020

Inhibitors of the Bub1 spindle assembly checkpoint kinase: Synthesis of BAY-320 and comparison with 2OH-BNPP1

SummaryBub1 is a serine/threonine kinase proposed to function centrally in both mitotic chromosome alignment and the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), however its role remains controversial. Although it is well documented that Bub1 phosphorylation of Histone 2A at T120 (H2ApT120) recruits Sgo1/2 to kinetochores, the requirement of its kinase activity for chromosome alignment and the SAC is debated. As small-molecule inhibitors can be invaluable tools for investigation of kinase function, we decided to evaluate the relative potential of two agents (2OH-BNPPI and BAY-320) as Bub1 inhibitors. After confirming that both agents inhibit Bub1 in vitro, we developed a cell based-assay to specifically measure Bub1 inhibition in vivo. For this assay we overexpressed a fusion of Histone 2B and the Bub1 kinase region (Bub1C) tethering it in close proximity to H2A, which generated a strong ectopic H2ApT120 signal along chromosome arms. The ectopic signal generated from Bub1C activity was effectively inhibited by BAY-320, but not 2OH-BNPP1. In addition, only BAY-320 was able to inhibit endogenous Bub1-mediated Sgo1 localisation. Preliminary experiments using BAY-320 suggested a minor role for Bub1 kinase activity in chromosome alignment and the SAC, however results suggest that BAY-320 may exhibit off-target effects at the concentration required to demonstrate these outcomes. In conclusion, 2OH-BNPP1 may not be an effective Bub1 inhibitor in vivo, and while BAY-320 is able to inhibit Bub1 in vivo, the high concentrations required and potential for off-target effects highlight the ongoing need for improved Bub1 inhibitors.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2019

A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of epigenetic age acceleration

Epigenetic age acceleration is a valuable biomarker of ageing, predictive of morbidity and mortality, but for which the underlying biological mechanisms are not well established. Two commonly used measures, derived from DNA methylation, are Horvath-based (Horvath-EAA) and Hannum-based (Hannum-EAA) epigenetic age acceleration. We conducted genome-wide association studies of Horvath-EAA and Hannum-EAA in 13,493 unrelated individuals of European ancestry, to elucidate genetic determinants of differential epigenetic ageing. We identified ten independent SNPs associated with Horvath-EAA, five of which are novel. We also report 21 Horvath-EAA-associated genes including several involved in metabolism (NHLRC, TPMT) and immune system pathways (TRIM59, EDARADD). GWAS of Hannum-EAA identified one associated variant (rs1005277), and implicated 12 genes including several involved in innate immune system pathways (UBE2D3, MANBA, TRIM46), with metabolic functions (UBE2D3, MANBA), or linked to lifespan regulation (CISD2). Both measures had nominal inverse genetic correlations with fathers age at death, a rough proxy for lifespan. Nominally significant genetic correlations between Hannum-EAA and lifestyle factors including smoking behaviours and education support the hypothesis that Hannum-based epigenetic ageing is sensitive to variations in environment, whereas Horvath-EAA is a more stable cellular ageing process. We identified novel SNPs and genes associated with epigenetic age acceleration, and highlighted differences in the genetic architecture of Horvath-based and Hannum-based epigenetic ageing measures. Understanding the biological mechanisms underlying individual differences in the rate of epigenetic ageing could help explain different trajectories of age-related decline.\n\nAuthor SummaryDNA methylation, a type of epigenetic process, is known to vary with age. Methylation levels at specific sites across the genome can be combined to form estimates of age known as epigenetic age. The difference between epigenetic age and chronological age is referred to as epigenetic age acceleration, with positive values indicating that a person is biologically older than their years. Understanding why some people seem to age faster than others could shed light on the biological processes behind age-related decline; however, the mechanisms underlying differential rates of epigenetic ageing are largely unknown. Here, we investigate genetic determinants of two commonly used epigenetic age acceleration measures, based on the Horvath and Hannum epigenetic clocks. We report novel genetic variants and genes associated with epigenetic age acceleration, and highlight differences in the genetic factors influencing these two measures. We identify ten genetic variants and 21 genes associated with Horvath-based epigenetic age acceleration, and one variant and 12 genes associated with the Hannum-based measure. There were no genome-wide significant variants or genes in common between the Horvath-based and Hannum-based measures, supporting the hypothesis that they represent different aspects of ageing. Our results suggest a partial genetic basis underlying some previously reported phenotypic associations.

genetics↗