bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Wessling, E. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Wessling, E. G..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Wild chimpanzee groups increase social connectivity prior to risky collective action

Cooperation is foundational to complex sociality, yet presents profound evolutionary dilemmas - costs and benefits are rarely distributed evenly and the decision to collaborate or defect can involve a complex contextual calculus. These challenges are compounded when cooperation scales from pairs to groups. Group-level cooperation is fundamental to many species success, but how is it sustained and regulated in nature? One promising route to addressing this question is to examine how individuals reorganise their affiliative interactions in anticipation of group-level cooperation. We examine such pre-cooperative reorganisation using long-term data (2013-2018) from three neighbouring groups of wild chimpanzees at the Tai National Park, Cote dIvoire, who routinely cooperate as a collective to defend their territory against other groups. We found that chimpanzees adjusted the distribution of their social contacts in anticipation of risky and proactive territorial defence by forming more broadly connected, yet more diffuse, affiliative networks. Specifically, adult chimpanzees groomed and played with more group members on days of proactive territorial defence, and this pattern was temporally-sensitive, with increased affiliation occurring before, rather than after, the cooperative act. Chimpanzees accessed a broader range of partners through increased interaction efficiency by switching between more partners with shorter interactions per partner. This pattern suggests a shared evolutionary basis of dynamic social readjustment in preparation for group-level social dilemmas in hominids, potentially providing the foundation for the formalized systems of affiliation found in human societies.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Targeted Chromosomal Sequencing of Wild Bonobos Identifies a Genetically Distinct Subpopulation East of the Lomami River

Bonobos (Pan paniscus), an endangered species, have for decades been genetically understudied, partly due to difficulties in obtaining high-quality samples. The study of their genome is important not only for understanding their evolution, but also for improving conservation efforts, including population management, diversity and inbreeding assessment, and tracking rescued individuals to combat illegal wildlife trafficking. Here, we use chromosome 21 target capture data from 156 non-invasively collected faecal samples from wild bonobos to perform a comprehensive analysis of their population structure. We confirm the existence of three previously suggested subpopulations identified here as Western, Central and Eastern bonobos which are defined by natural barriers of gene flow such as the Lomami River. By estimating levels of inbreeding, diversity and differentiation, we find support for isolation of mainly Western and Eastern populations and add information on the dispersal routes of their ancestors. We infer split times and separation of these populations and apply a genetic framework to geolocalize samples of unknown origin, showing that locations of their potential origin can be estimated with a precision of up to a median of [~]50 km. Our study provides valuable insight into the evolution and population structure of bonobos and reveals how rivers act as strong barriers between populations. It also offers resources for conservation efforts and highlights the need to monitor bonobo populations more closely, in particular isolated ones. ImpactBonobos have been difficult to study genetically due to their remote forest habitat and endangered status. Here we used non-invasive sampling and chromosome 21 target capture sequencing to perform the most detailed analysis to date of their population structure. We find three main subpopulations and genetic differentiation influenced by river barriers, especially with populations found on the Eastern side of the Lomami river. This data will be useful for identifying the geographic origin of confiscated samples and thus aid bonobo conservation efforts.

bioinformatics↗

Failure to account for behavioral variability overestimates bonobo populations and compromises accuracy in population monitoring

Indirect wildlife population surveying largely depends upon counts of artefacts of behavior (e.g., nests or dung). Likelihood to encounter these artefacts is derived from both artefact production and decay, and variability in production behavior is considered to contribute minimally to inaccuracy in wildlife estimation. Here, we demonstrate how ignoring behavioral variability contributes to significant population misestimation, using an example of an endangered ape, the bonobo (Pan paniscus). Until now, a single estimate of nest construction rate has been used to extrapolate bonobo densities, assumed to be broadly representative of bonobo sign production behavior. We estimated nest construction rates across seasons and social groups at the Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve, DRC, and find nest construction rates in bonobos to be highly variable across populations as well as seasonal. Failure to account for this variability led to degradation in the accuracy of bonobo population estimates of abundance, accounting for a likely overestimation of bonobo numbers by 34%, and at worst as high as 80%. With this example, we demonstrate that failure to account for inter- and intra-population behavioral variation compromises the ability to estimate both relative and absolute wildlife abundances. We argue that variation in sign production is but one of several potential ways that behavioral variability can affect conservation monitoring, should be measured across contexts whenever possible, and must be considered in population estimation confidence intervals. With increasing attention to be-havioral variability as a potential tool for conservation, conservationists must also account for the impact that behavioral variability can play upon wildlife population estimation. Our results underline the importance of observational research to wildlife monitoring schemes as a critical component of conservation management. We discuss the avenues through which behavioral variability is likely to impact wildlife monitoring accuracy and precision and propose potential approaches for accounting for behavioral variability in wildlife monitoring.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Evaluating the efficacy of a consumer-centric method for ecological sampling: Using bonobo (Pan paniscus) feeding patterns as an instrument for tropical forest characterization

O_LICharacteristics of food availability and distribution are a key component of a species ecology. Objective measurement of food resources, such as vegetation plot sampling, do not consider aspects of selection by the consumer and therefore may produce imprecise measures of availability. Further, in most animal ecology research, traditional ecological surveying often is time-intensive and supplementary to ongoing behavioral observation. We propose a method to integrate ecological sampling of an animals environment into existing behavioral data collection systems by using the consumer as the surveyor. Here, we introduce the consumer-centric method (CCM) of assessing resource availability for its ability to measure food resource abundance, distribution, and dispersion. This method catalogues feeding locations observed during behavioral observation and uses aggregated data to characterize these ecological metrics. C_LIO_LIWe evaluated the CCM relative to traditional vegetation plot surveying using accumulated feeding locations across three years visited by a tropical frugivore, the bonobo (Pan paniscus), and compared it with data derived from over 200 vegetation plots across their 50km2+ home range. C_LIO_LIWe demonstrate that food species abundance estimates derived from the CCM are comparable to those derived from traditional vegetation plot sampling after approximately 600 observation days or 60 spatially explicit feeding locations. The agreement between the methods further improved when accounting for aspects of consumer selectivity in objective vegetation plot sampling (e.g., size minima). Estimates of density from CCM correlated with plot-derived estimates and were relatively insensitive to home range inclusion and other species characteristics, but were sensitive to sampling frequency (e.g., consumption frequency). Agreement between the methods in relative distribution of resources performed better across species than expected by chance, although measures of dispersion correlated poorly. C_LIO_LIWe demonstrate that while providing a robust measure to quantify local food availability, the CCM has an advantage over traditional sampling methods as it incorporates sampling biases relevant to the consumer. Therefore, as this method can be incorporated into existing observational data collection and does not require additional ecological surveying, it serves as a promising method for behavioral ecological data collection for animal species who re-use space and consume immobile food items. C_LI

ecology↗

Non-genetic maternal effects shape individual differences in cortisol phenotypes in wild chimpanzees

Glucocorticoids, such as cortisol, mediate homeostatic processes, allowing individuals to adjust to fluctuating environments. The regulation of circadian cortisol responses, a key homeostatic function, has been shown to be heritable. However, to understand better the role of parental care in shaping physiological functioning in long-lived mammals with protracted parental care, there is a need to disentangle genetic and non-genetic parental contributions to variation in glucocorticoid phenotypes. We used a dataset of 6,123 cortisol measures from urine samples from 170 wild chimpanzees spanning 18 years of data collection. We found consistent inter-individual differences in circadian cortisol phenotypes, with differences most apparent when considering average cortisol levels given the effect of time of day. Maternal effects explained around 10% (2-18%) variation in these average cortisol levels, while variation attributable to genetic factors was not distinguishable from zero. Our results indicate, relative to genetic effects, a qualitatively stronger influence of mothers, whether via epigenetic processes or via behavioral priming for coping with stressors, in shaping cortisol phenotypes in this species. This provides novel insight into the vital role of mothers in the developmental plasticity of long-lived mammals and, more generally, the selective pressures shaping physiological plasticity.

zoology↗

Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) density and environmental gradients at their biogeographical range edge

Identifying ecological gradients at the range edge of a species is an essential step in revealing the underlying mechanisms and constraints that limit the species geographic range. We aimed to describe the patterns of variation in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) density and habitat characteristics perpendicular to the northern edge of their range and to investigate potential environmental mechanisms underlying chimpanzee distribution in a savanna-mosaic habitat. We estimated chimpanzee densities at six sites forming a 126 km latitudinal gradient at the biogeographical range edge of the western chimpanzee in the savanna-mosaic habitats of southeastern Senegal. To accompany these data, we used systematically placed vegetation plots to characterize the habitats at each site for habitat heterogeneity, tree density and size, floral assemblages, among other variables. We found that both biotic and abiotic factors are potential determinants of the chimpanzee range limit in this ecoregion. Specifically, chimpanzee-occupied landscapes at the limit had smaller available floral assemblages, less habitat heterogeneity, and contained fewer closed canopy habitats in which chimpanzees could seek refuge from high temperatures than landscapes farther from the range limit. This pattern was accompanied by a decline in chimpanzee density with increasing proximity to the range limit. Our results provide several indications of the potential limits of food species diversity, thermal refuge, and water availability to the chimpanzee niche and the implications of these limits for chimpanzee biogeography, especially in the face of climate change predictions, as well as to species distributional modeling more generally.

ecology↗