Biology subjects

Werner, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Werner, B..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Variation of mutational burden in healthy human tissues suggests non-random strand segregation and allows measuring somatic mutation rates

The immortal strand hypothesis poses that stem cells could produce differentiated progeny while conserving the original template strand, thus avoiding accumulating somatic mutations. However, quantitating the extent of non-random DNA strand segregation in human stem cells remains difficult in vivo. Here we show that the change of the mean and variance of the mutational burden with age in healthy human tissues allows estimating strand segregation probabilities and somatic mutation rates. We analysed deep sequencing data from healthy human colon, small intestine, liver, skin and brain. We found highly effective non-random DNA strand segregation in all adult tissues (mean strand segregation probability: 0.98, standard error bounds (0.97,0.99)). In contrast, non-random strand segregation efficiency is reduced to 0.87 (0.78,0.88) in neural tissue during early development, suggesting stem cell pool expansions due to symmetric self-renewal. Healthy somatic mutation rates differed across tissue types, ranging from 3.5x10-9 /bp/division in small intestine to 1.6x10-7/bp/division in skin.\n\nAuthor SummaryCairn proposed in 1975 that upon proliferation, cells might not segregate DNA strands randomly into daughter cells, but preferentially keep the ancestral (blue print) template strand in stem cells. This mechanism would allow to drastically reduce the rate of mutation accumulation in human tissues. Testing the hypothesis in human stem cells within their natural tissue environment remains challenging. Here we show that the patterns of mutation accumulation in human tissues with age support highly effective non-random DNA strand segregation after adolescence. In contrast, during early development in infants, DNA strand segregation is less effective, likely because stem cell populations are continuing to grow.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Replicative cellular age distributions in compartmentalised tissues

The cellular age distribution of hierarchically organized tissues can reveal important insights into the dynamics of cell differentiation and self-renewal and associated cancer risks. Here, we examine theoretically the effect of progenitor compartments with varying differentiation and self-renewal capacities on the resulting observable distributions of replicative cellular ages. We find that strongly amplifying progenitor compartments, i.e. compartments with high self-renewal capacities, substantially broaden the age distributions which become skewed towards younger cells with a long tail of few old cells. However, since mutations predominantly accumulate during cell division, a few old cells may considerably increase cancer risk. In contrast, if tissues are organised into many downstream compartments with low self-renewal capacity, the shape of the replicative cell distributions in more differentiated compartments are dominated by stem cell dynamics with little added variation. In the limiting case of a strict binary differentiation tree without self-renewal, the shape of the output distribution becomes indistinguishable from the shape of the input distribution. Our results suggest that a comparison of cellular age distributions between healthy and cancerous tissues may inform about dynamical changes within the hierarchical tissue structure, i.e. an acquired increased self-renewal capacity in certain tumours.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Reply: Neutral tumor evolution?

Mutation, selection and neutral drift shape the cancer evolutionary process1. The role of selection has received particular interest, but inferring the presence and strength of selection during tumour growth remains challenging. Recently, we analysed the frequency distribution of subclonal mutations in many cancers and found that in approximately 30% of cases the observed distribution was entirely consistent with a simple model of neutral evolution2. Thus, we concluded that neutral evolution, perhaps surprisingly, provides an adequate explanation of the intra-tumour heterogeneity present in a significant proportion of cancers.\n\nTarabichi and colleagues [bioRxiv: 2017/06/30/158006] question the robustness of the method we presented in Williams et al. 20162 to identify neutral cancer evolution from variant allele frequency (VAF) distributions. Their critique has four main points that we addre ...

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2016

Quantification of subclonal selection in cancer from bulk sequencing data

Recent studies have identified prevalent subclonal architectures within many cancer types. However, the temporal evolutionary dynamics that produce these subclonal architectures remain unknown. Here we measure evolutionary dynamics in primary human cancers using computational modelling of clonal selection applied to high throughput sequencing data. Our approach simultaneously determines the subclonal architecture of a tumour sample, and measures the mutation rate, the selective advantage, and the time of appearance of subclones. Simulations demonstrate the accuracy of the method, and revealed the degree to which evolutionary dynamics are recorded in the genome. Application of our method to high-depth sequencing data from gastric and lung cancers revealed that detectable subclones consistently emerged early during tumour growth and had considerably large fitness advantages (>20% growth advantage). Our quantitative platform provides new insight into the evolutionary history of cancers by facilitating the measurement of fundamental evolutionary parameters in individual patients.

cancer biology↗