Biology subjects

Weinreich, D. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Weinreich, D. M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2017

The influence of higher-order epistasis on biological fitness landscape topography

The effect of a mutation on the organism often depends on what other mutations are already present in its genome. Geneticists refer to such mutational interactions as epistasis. Pairwise epistatic effects have been recognized for over a century, and their evolutionary implications have received theoretical attention for nearly as long. However, pairwise epistatic interactions themselves can vary with genomic background. This is called higher-order epistasis, and its consequences for evolution are much less well understood. Here, we assess the influence that higher-order epistasis has on the topography of 16 published, biological fitness landscapes. We find that on average, their effects on fitness landscape declines with order, and suggest that notable exceptions to this trend may deserve experimental scrutiny. We explore whether natural selection may have contributed to this finding, and conclude by highlight opportunities for further work dissecting the influence that epistasis of all orders has on the efficiency of natural selection.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Sign of selection on mutation rate modifiers depends on population size

The influence of population size (N) on natural selection acting on alleles that affect fitness has been understood for over half a century1. As N declines, genetic drift overwhelms selection and alleles with direct fitness effects are rendered neutral. Often, though, alleles experience so called indirect selection, meaning they affect not the fitness of an individual but the fitness distribution of its offspring. Some of the best studied examples of indirect selection include alleles that modify aspects of the genetic system such as recombination2 and mutation3 rates. Here we use analytics, simulations and experimental populations of S. cerevisiae to show that modifiers that increase the genomic mutation rate (mutators) are favored by indirect selection in large populations but become disfavored as N declines. This surprising phenomenon of sign inversion in selective effect demonstrates that indirect selection on a mutator exhibits a qualitatively novel dependence on N. Sign inversion may help understand the relatively sporadic distribution of mutators in nature despite their frequent emergence in laboratory populations. More generally, sign inversion may be broadly applicable to other instances of indirect selection, suggesting a previously unappreciated but critical role of population size in evolution.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Natural selection can favor the evolution of ratchet robustness over evolution of mutational robustness

The vast majority of fitness-affecting mutations are deleterious. How natural populations evolve to cope is a question of fundamental interest. Previous studies have reported the evolution of mutational robustness, that is, natural selection favoring populations with less deleterious mutations. By definition, mutational robustness provides a short-term fitness advantage. However, this overlooks the fact that mutational robustness decreases finite asexual populations ability to purge recurrent deleterious mutations. Thus, mutational robustness also results in higher risk of long-term extinction by Mullers ratchet. Here, we explore the tension between short- and long- term response to deleterious mutations. We first show that populations can resist the ratchet if either the selection coefficient or the ratio of beneficial to deleterious mutations increases as fitness declines. We designate these properties as ratchet robustness, which fundamentally reflects a negative feedback between mutation rate and the tendency to accumulate more mutations. We also find in simulations that populations can evolve ratchet robustness when challenged by deleterious mutations. We conclude that mutational robustness cannot be selected for in the long term, but it can be favored in the short-term, purely because of temporary fitness advantage. We also discuss other potential causes of mutational robustness in nature.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Variability in fitness effects and the limitations of lineage selection

Evolutionary biologists commonly assess the evolutionary advantage of an allele based on its effects on the lifetime survival and reproduction of individuals. However, alleles affecting traits like sex, evolvability, and cooperation can cause fitness effects that depend heavily on differences in the environmental, genetic, and social context of individuals carrying the allele. This variability makes it difficult to summarize the evolutionary fate of an allele based solely on its effects on any one individual. In this review we show how attempts to average over variability in the fitness effects of an allele can sometimes cause misleading results. We then describe a number of intriguing new evolutionary phenomena that have emerged in studies that explicitly model the fate of alleles that influence long-term lineage dynamics. We conclude with prospects for generalizations of population genetics theory and discuss how this theory might be applied to the evolution of infectious diseases.

evolutionary biology↗