Biology subjects

Weiner, A. T.

Publications and source records attributed to Weiner, A. T..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Mitochondria redistribution organizes the immunosuppressive tumor ecosystem

Hostile conditions in the tumor microenvironment restrict cellular respiration, yet mitochondrial metabolism remains indispensable for tumor growth and the activity of immunosuppressive cells. How tumor ecosystems sustain mitochondrial output has been unclear. Here, we show that cancer cells resolve this paradox by acting as hubs of intercellular mitochondrial redistribution. Using mitochondrial reporter systems, we demonstrate that cancer cells import host-derived mitochondria, integrate them into their endogenous network, and subsequently relay these hybrid organelles to neighboring immune cells. Mitochondria redistribution reprograms recipient neutrophils, macrophages, and CD4+ T cells into highly suppressive states but drives CD8+ T cell exhaustion. Within cancer cells, fusion of incoming mitochondria induces filamentous P5CS assembly, enhances biosynthetic output, and enables the refurbishment of damaged organelles into fully functional units. Disrupting mitochondrial redistribution collapses the immunosuppressive ecosystem and impairs tumor growth. Thus, cancer cells do not hoard resources but orchestrate a redistribution program that fortifies their own metabolic resilience, derails anti-tumor immunity, and sustains immunosuppressive partners. HIGHLIGHTSO_LITumor cells regulate their ecosystem by redistributing mitochondria C_LIO_LIRedistributed mitochondria expand immunosuppressive cells but exhausts CD8+ T cells C_LIO_LIMitochondria fusion within cancer cells, which precedes redistribution, optimizes metabolic output by triggering conformational changes in P5CS C_LIO_LIMitochondria fusion allows cancer cells to incorporate and refurbish seemingly incompetent host-derived mitochondria, improving efficiency in the tumor ecosystem C_LI

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2024

Cluster Assembly Dynamics Drive Fidelity of Planar Cell Polarity Polarization

In planar cell polarity (PCP) signaling, distinct molecular subcomplexes segregate to opposite sides of each cell, where they interact across intercellular junctions to form asymmetric clusters. Although proximal-distal asymmetry within PCP clusters is the defining feature of PCP signaling, the mechanism by which this asymmetry develops remains unclear. Here, we developed a method to count the number of monomers of core PCP proteins within individual clusters in live animals and used it to infer the underlying molecular dynamics of cluster assembly and polarization. Measurements over time and space in wild type and in strategically chosen mutants demonstrate that cluster assembly is required for polarization, and together with mathematical modeling provide evidence that clusters become increasingly asymmetric and correctly oriented as they increase in size. We propose that cluster assembly dynamics amplify weak and noisy inputs into a robust cellular output, in this case cell and tissue-level polarization.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Cell autonomous polarization by the planar cell polarity signaling pathway

As epithelial cells polarize in the tissue plane, the Planar Cell Polarity (PCP) signaling module segregates two distinct molecular subcomplexes to opposite sides of cells. Homodimers of the atypical cadherin Flamingo form bridges linking opposite complexes in neighboring cells, coordinating their direction of polarization. Feedback is required for cell polarization, but whether feedback requires intercellular and/or intracellular pathways is unknown. Using novel tools, we show that cells lacking Flamingo, or bearing a homodimerization-deficient Flamingo, polarize autonomously, indicating that functional PCP subcomplexes form and segregate cell-autonomously. Furthermore, we identify feedback pathways and propose an asymmetry amplifying mechanism that operate cell-autonomously. The intrinsic logic of PCP signaling is therefore more similar to that in single cell systems than was previously recognized.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Protein phosphatase 1 regulates core PCP signaling

AbstractPCP signaling polarizes epithelial cells within the plane of an epithelium. Core PCP signaling components adopt asymmetric subcellular localizations within cells to both polarize and coordinate polarity between cells. Achieving subcellular asymmetry requires additional effectors, including some mediating post-translational modifications of core components. Identification of such proteins is challenging due to pleiotropy. We used mass spectrometry-based proximity labeling proteomics to identify such regulators in the Drosophila wing. We identified the catalytic subunit of Protein Phosphatase1, Pp1-87B, and show that it regulates core protein polarization. Pp1-87B interacts with the core protein Van Gogh and at least one Serine/Threonine kinase, Dco/CKIc, that is known to regulate PCP. Pp1-87B modulates Van Gogh subcellular localization and directs its dephosphorylation in vivo. PNUTS, a Pp1 regulatory subunit, also modulates PCP. While the direct substrate(s) of Pp1-87B in control of PCP is not known, our data support the model that cycling between phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms of one or more core PCP components may regulate acquisition of asymmetry. Finally, our screen serves as a resource for identifying additional regulators of PCP signaling.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Functional assessment of the "two-hit" model for neurodevelopmental defects in Drosophila and X. laevis

We previously identified a deletion on chromosome 16p12.1 that is mostly inherited and associated with multiple neurodevelopmental outcomes, where severely affected probands carried an excess of rare pathogenic variants compared to mildly affected carrier parents. We hypothesized that the 16p12.1 deletion sensitizes the genome for disease, while "second-hits" in the genetic background modulate the phenotypic trajectory. To test this model, we examined how neurodevelopmental defects conferred by knockdown of individual 16p12.1 homologs are modulated by simultaneous knockdown of homologs of "second-hit" genes in Drosophila melanogaster and Xenopus laevis. We observed that knockdown of 16p12.1 homologs affect multiple phenotypic domains, leading to delayed developmental timing, seizure susceptibility, brain alterations, abnormal dendrite and axonal morphology, and cellular proliferation defects. Compared to genes within the 16p11.2 deletion, which has higher de novo occurrence, 16p12.1 homologs were less likely to interact with each other in Drosophila models or a human brain-specific interaction network, suggesting that interactions with "second-hit" genes may confer higher impact towards neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Assessment of 212 pairwise interactions in Drosophila between 16p12.1 homologs and 76 homologs of patient-specific "second-hit" genes (such as ARID1B and CACNA1A), genes within neurodevelopmental pathways (such as PTEN and UBE3A), and transcriptomic targets (such as DSCAM and TRRAP) identified genetic interactions in 63% of the tested pairs. In 11 out of 15 families, homologs of patient-specific "second-hits" enhanced or suppressed the phenotypic effects of one or many 16p12.1 homologs. In fact, homologs of SETD5 synergistically interacted with homologs of MOSMO in both Drosophila and X. laevis, leading to modified cellular and brain phenotypes, as well as axon outgrowth defects that were not observed with knockdown of either individual homolog. Our results suggest that several 16p12.1 genes sensitize the genome towards neurodevelopmental defects, and complex interactions with "second-hit" genes determine the ultimate phenotypic manifestation. Author SummaryCopy-number variants, or deletions and duplications in the genome, are associated with multiple neurodevelopmental disorders. The developmental delay-associated 16p12.1 deletion is mostly inherited, and severely affected children carry an excess of "second-hits" variants compared to mildly affected carrier parents, suggesting that additional variants modulate the clinical manifestation. We studied this "two-hit" model using Drosophila and Xenopus laevis, and systematically tested how homologs of "second-hit" genes modulate neurodevelopmental defects observed for 16p12.1 homologs. We observed that 16p12.1 homologs independently led to multiple neurodevelopmental features and weakly interacted with each other, suggesting that interactions with "second-hit" homologs potentially have a higher impact towards neurodevelopmental defects than interactions between 16p12.1 homologs. We tested 212 pairwise interactions of 16p12.1 homologs with "second-hit" homologs and genes within conserved neurodevelopmental pathways, and observed modulation of neurodevelopmental defects caused by 16p12.1 homologs in 11 out of 15 families, and 16/32 of these changes could be attributed to genetic interactions. Interestingly, we observed that SETD5 homologs interacted with homologs of MOSMO, which conferred additional neuronal phenotypes not observed with knockdown of individual homologs. We propose that the 16p12.1 deletion sensitizes the genome to multiple neurodevelopmental defects, and complex interactions with "second-hit" genes determine the clinical trajectory of the disorder.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2017

Pervasive epistasis in cell proliferation pathways modulates neurodevelopmental defects of autism-associated 16p11.2 deletion

As opposed to syndromic CNVs caused by single genes, extensive phenotypic heterogeneity in variably-expressive CNVs complicates disease gene discovery and functional evaluation. Here, we propose a complex interaction model for pathogenicity of the autism-associated 16p11.2 deletion, where CNV genes interact with each other in conserved pathways to modulate expression of the phenotype. Using multiple quantitative methods in Drosophila RNAi lines, we identified a range of neurodevelopmental phenotypes for knockdown of individual 16p11.2 homologs in different tissues. We tested 565 pairwise knockdowns in the developing eye, and identified 24 interactions between pairs of 16p11.2 homologs and 46 interactions between 16p11.2 homologs and neurodevelopmental genes that suppressed or enhanced cell proliferation phenotypes compared to one-hit knockdowns. These interactions within cell proliferation pathways were also enriched in a human brain-specific network, providing translational relevance in humans. Our study indicates a role for genetic interactions within CNVs and identifies potential therapeutic targets for neurodevelopmental disorders.

genomics↗