bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Weeks, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Weeks, T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

MycorrhizaTracer: A BIOINFORMATIC PIPELINE FOR FUNGI AND PLANT CLASSIFICATION OF SANGER DNA SEQUENCES

Processing Sanger DNA sequences remains a routine yet technically demanding step in many biodiversity and ecological studies, particularly when barcoding large numbers of environmental samples. Manual inspection and editing of trace files, DNA sequence alignment, and classification using taxonomic reference databases is time-consuming, inconsistent, and prone to error. These challenges are compounded in studies involving degraded samples, in-house DNA sequencing, under-described taxa, or when investigators have limited access to computational tools. We present MycorrhizaTracer, an open-source, fully automated pipeline for processing and taxonomically classifying large batches of Sanger sequencing chromatograms. We have optimized it for fungal and plant taxa, but it is adaptable across the tree of life. The pipeline performs quality trimming, consensus generation from bidirectional reads, taxonomic classification via BLAST, clustering, optional salvaging of low-quality sequences, and functional annotation of fungal taxa. Designed for scalability and ease of use, MycorrhizaTracer can process thousands of DNA chromatograms in a matter of hours without the need for an HPC. Accuracy and ecological relevance are ensured by features such as gene region-specific taxonomic filtering and sequence-based clustering of unclassified reads. By streamlining trace-to-taxon workflows, MycorrhizaTracer reduces the burden of manual curation, supports reproducibility, and enables efficient recovery of biodiversity data from Sanger sequences - particularly in field-based or resource-limited research contexts.

bioinformatics↗

Systematic review of biodiversity monitoring shows gradual rise of scaleable and automated methods and inherent spatial and taxonomic biases

1Global policy efforts to reverse biodiversity declines are hindered by a lack of clarity over how to measure biodiversity. The debate over the best ways to define biodiversity and which metrics to use has taken place in the absence of a clear, holistic view of how biodiversity has been, and is currently, measured. This gap has hindered us moving from discussion to action on conserving biodiversity. Here we track trends in biodiversity measurement, using a dataset of >2400 papers across the last 22 years, identifying trends, biases, and gaps in the assessment of nine major taxonomic groups (Invertebrate, fish, aquatic mammal, terrestrial mammal, bird, herpetofauna, fungi, microbe and plant). We found proportional declines in invertebrate, but increases in fish, surveys over time, and fewer assessments of biodiversity in Africa and Oceania. Although we do find an increase in the use of high-throughput, scaleable methods such as eDNA and camera-traps, their uptake is more modest than might be expected and shows signs of having already plateaued. We argue that emerging technologies can, but remain underutilised in addressing the systematic biases in our understanding of biodiversity, and so in helping guide and track our progress towards restoring and saving biodiversity.

ecology↗