Biology subjects

Watkins, K. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Watkins, K. E..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Transcranial direct current stimulation over left inferior frontal cortex improves speech fluency in adults who stutter

Stuttering is a neurodevelopmental disorder affecting 5% of children, and persisting in 1% of adults. Promoting lasting fluency improvement in adults who stutter is a particular challenge. Novel interventions to improve outcomes are required, therefore. Previous work in patients with acquired motor and language disorders reported enhanced benefits of behavioural therapies when paired with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Here, we report the results of the first trial investigating whether tDCS can improve speech fluency in adults who stutter. Thirty adult men who stutter completed a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of anodal tDCS over left inferior frontal cortex. Fifteen men received 20 minutes of 1-mA tDCS on five consecutive days while speech fluency was temporarily induced using choral and metronome-timed speech. The other 15 men received the same speech fluency intervention with sham stimulation. We predicted that applying anodal tDCS to the left inferior frontal cortex during speech production with temporary fluency inducers would result in longer-lasting fluency improvements. Speech fluency during reading and conversation was assessed at baseline, before and after the stimulation on each day of the five-day intervention, and at 1 and 6 weeks after the end of the intervention. TDCS combined with speech fluency training significantly reduced the percentage of disfluent speech measured 1 week after the intervention compared with fluency intervention alone. At 6 weeks after the intervention, this improvement was maintained during reading but not during conversation. Outcome scores at both post-intervention time points on a clinical assessment tool (the Stuttering Severity Instrument - version 4) also showed significant improvement in the group receiving tDCS compared with the sham group, in whom fluency was unchanged from baseline. We conclude that tDCS combined with behavioural fluency intervention has the capacity to improve fluency in adults who stutter. tDCS thereby offers a potentially useful adjunct to future speech therapy interventions for this population, for whom therapy outcomes are currently limited.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Cortico-Cerebellar Networks Drive Sensorimotor Learning in Speech

The motor cortex and cerebellum are thought to be critical for learning and maintaining motor behaviours. Here we use tDCS to test the role of the motor cortex and cerebellum in sensorimotor learning in speech. During productions of head, bed, and dead, the first formant of the vowel sound was altered in real-time towards the first formant of the vowel sound in had, bad, and dad. Compensatory changes in first and second formant production were used as a measure of motor adaptation. TDCS to either the motor cortex or the cerebellum improved sensorimotor learning in speech compared to sham stimulation. However, in the case of cerebellar tDCS, production changes were restricted to the source of the acoustical error (i.e. the first formant). Motor cortex tDCS drove production changes that offset errors in the first formant, but, unlike cerebellar tDCS, adaptive changes in the second formant also occurred. The results suggest that motor cortex and cerebellar tDCS have both shared and dissociable effects on motor adaptation. The study provides initial causal evidence in speech production that the motor cortex and the cerebellum support different aspects of sensorimotor learning. We propose that motor cortex tDCS drives sensorimotor learning towards previously learned patterns of movement, while cerebellar tDCS focuses sensorimotor learning on error correction.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Facilitation of motor excitability during listening to spoken sentences is not modulated by noise or semantic coherence

Comprehending speech can be particularly challenging in a noisy environment and in the absence of semantic context. It has been proposed that the articulatory motor system would be recruited especially in difficult listening conditions. However, it remains unknown how signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and semantic context affect the recruitment of the articulatory motor system when listening to continuous speech. The aim of the present study was to address the hypothesis that involvement of the articulatory motor cortex increases when the intelligibility and clarity of the spoken sentences decreases, because of noise and the lack of semantic context. We applied Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to the lip and hand representations in the primary motor cortex and measured motor evoked potentials from the lip and hand muscles, respectively, to evaluate motor excitability when young adults listened to sentences. In Experiment 1, we found that the excitability of the lip motor cortex was facilitated during listening to both semantically anomalous and coherent sentences in noise, but neither SNR nor semantic context modulated the facilitation. In Experiment 2, we replicated these findings and found no difference in the excitability of the lip motor cortex between sentences in noise and clear sentences without noise. Thus, our results show that the articulatory motor cortex is involved in speech processing even in optimal and ecologically valid listening conditions and that its involvement is not modulated by the intelligibility and clarity of speech.

neuroscience↗