bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Ward, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Ward, L..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Using human sequencing to guide craniofacial research.

A recent convergence of technological innovations has re-energized the ability to apply genetics to research in human craniofacial development. Next-generation exome and whole genome sequencing have dropped in price significantly making it relatively trivial to sequence and analyze patients and families with congenital craniofacial anomalies. A concurrent revolution in genome editing with the use of the CRISPR-Cas9 system enables the rapid generation of animal models, including mouse, which can precisely recapitulate human variants. Here we summarize the choices currently available to the research community. We illustrate this approach with the study of a family with a novel craniofacial syndrome with dominant inheritance pattern. The genomic analysis suggest a causal variant in AMOTL1 which we modeled in mice. We also made a novel deletion allele of Amotl1. Our results indicate that Amotl1 is not required in the mouse for survival to weaning. Mice carrying the variant identified in the human sequencing studies, however, do not survive to weaning in normal ratios. The cause of death is not understood for these mice complicating our conclusions about the pathogenicity in the index patient. Thus, we highlight some of the powerful opportunities and confounding factors confronting current craniofacial genetic research.

genetics

Distinct neural systems for the production of communicative vocal behaviors

Vocalizations are the production of sounds by the coordinated activity of up to eighty respiratory and laryngeal muscles. Whilst voiced acts, modified by the upper vocal tract (tongue, jaw, lip and palate) are central to the production of human speech, they are also central to the production of emotional vocalizations such as sounds of disgust, anger, laughter and crying. Evidence suggests that the speech and emotional vocalizations may comprise distinct classes of vocal movements: patients with speech production deficits are often able to produce emotional vocalizations. In addition to this, the ontogeny of the two articulations is largely distinct, with some culturally universal emotional vocalizations emerging soon after birth and human speech being a culture specific, highly learnt motor act, which must develop to some degree before a critical period in development. Here we investigate the motor pathways underlying these two classes of vocal movements for the first time by directly comparing BOLD responses during production of speech and non-speech vocal movements. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we report distinct patterns of activity in both subcortical and cortical regions (putamen and bilateral inferior frontal and parietal cortices) during the production of emotional vocalizations compared to speech production. In contrast we show that responses in primary sensorimotor regions do not differ during the production of speech and emotional vocalizations, suggesting partially overlapping, and partially non-overlapping neural structures for the motor control of these two classes of movement. In addition to this we report that responses in auditory cortices are distinct during the production of speech and non-speech vocalizations, suggesting that feedback control of speech and emotional vocalizations are distinct. These data provide novel evidence for the presence of dual pathways for the neural control of complex articulatory movements in humans. These findings are discussed in relation to the clinical and primate literature of vocal motor control.\n\nSignificance StatementThis work marks the first evidence in healthy humans for dual routes to vocal behaviors. Clinical evidence suggests that patients unable to produce speech may still be able to produce other vocal behaviors that employ the same set of effectors. Here we demonstrate that the production of different classes of vocal behavior is associated with overlapping and distinct networks of activity. Moreover, we show that auditory processing that occurs during the production of these movements may be distinct, suggesting that feedback may be used differently for these distinct classes of vocal movement.

neuroscience