bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Wang, S. H.

Publications and source records attributed to Wang, S. H..

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Resting-state cross-frequency coupling networks in human electrophysiological recordings

Phase synchronization of neuronal oscillations in specific frequency bands coordinates anatomically distributed neuronal processing and communication. Typically, oscillations and synchronization take place concurrently in many distinct frequencies, which serve separate computational roles in cognitive functions. While within-frequency phase synchronization has been studied extensively, less is known about the mechanisms that govern neuronal processing distributed across frequencies and brain regions. Such integration of processing between frequencies could be achieved via cross-frequency coupling (CFC), either by phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) or by n:m-cross-frequency phase synchrony (CFS). So far, studies have mostly focused on local CFC in individual brain regions, whereas the presence and functional organization of CFC between brain areas have remained largely unknown. We posit that inter-areal CFC may be essential for large-scale coordination of neuronal activity and investigate here whether genuine CFC networks are present in human resting-state brain activity. To assess the functional organization of CFC networks, we identified brain-wide CFC networks at meso-scale resolution from stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) and at macro-scale resolution from source-reconstructed magnetoencephalography (MEG) data. We developed a novel graph-theoretical method to distinguish genuine CFC from spurious CFC that may arise from non-sinusoidal signals ubiquitous in neuronal activity. We show that genuine inter-areal CFC is present in human resting-state activity in both MEG and SEEG data. Both CFS and PAC networks coupled theta and alpha oscillations with higher frequencies in large-scale networks connecting anterior and posterior brain regions. CFS and PAC networks had distinct spectral patterns and opposing distribution of low- and high frequency network hubs, implying that they constitute distinct CFC mechanisms. The strength of CFS networks was also predictive of cognitive performance in a separate neuropsychological assessment. In conclusion, these results provide evidence for inter-areal CFS and PAC being two distinct mechanisms for coupling oscillations across frequencies in large-scale brain networks.

neuroscience↗

Ghost interactions in MEG/EEG source space: A note of caution on inter-areal coupling measures

When combined with source modeling, magneto- (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) can be used to study long-range interactions among cortical processes non-invasively. Estimation of such inter-areal connectivity is nevertheless hindered by instantaneous field spread and volume conduction, which artificially introduce linear correlations and impair source separability in cortical current estimates. To overcome the inflating effects of linear source mixing inherent to standard interaction measures, alternative phase- and amplitude-correlation based connectivity measures, such as imaginary coherence and orthogonalized amplitude correlation have been proposed. Being by definition insensitive to zero-lag correlations, these techniques have become increasingly popular in the identification of correlations that cannot be attributed to field spread or volume conduction. We show here, however, that while these measures are immune to the direct effects of linear mixing, they may still reveal large numbers of spurious false positive connections through field spread in the vicinity of true interactions. This fundamental problem affects both region-of-interest-based analyses and all-to-all connectome mappings. Most importantly, beyond defining and illustrating the problem of spurious, or \"ghost\" interactions, we provide a rigorous quantification of this effect through extensive simulations. Additionally, we further show that signal mixing also significantly limits the separability of neuronal phase and amplitude correlations. We conclude that spurious correlations must be carefully considered in connectivity analyses in MEG/EEG source space even when using measures that are immune to zero-lag correlations.\n\nHighlights{checkmark} Reliable estimation of neuronal coupling with MEG and EEG is challenged by signal mixing\n{checkmark}A number of coupling techniques attempt to overcome this limitation by excluding zero-lag interactions\n{checkmark}Contrary to what is commonly admitted, our simulations illustrate that such interaction metrics will still yield false positives\n{checkmark}Spurious, or \"ghost\", interactions are generally detected between sources in the vicinity of true phase-lagged interacting sources\n{checkmark}Signal mixing also severely affects the mutual separability of phase and amplitude correlations

neuroscience↗

Hyperedge bundling: A practical solution to spurious interactions in MEG/EEG source connectivity analyses

Inter-areal functional connectivity (FC), neuronal synchronization in particular, is thought to constitute a key systems-level mechanism for coordination of neuronal processing and communication between brain regions. Evidence to support this hypothesis has been gained largely using invasive electrophysiological approaches. In humans, neuronal activity can be non-invasively recorded only with magneto- and electroencephalography (MEG/EEG), which have been used to assess FC networks with high temporal resolution and whole-scalp coverage. However, even in source-reconstructed MEG/EEG data, signal mixing, or \"source leakage\", is a significant confounder for FC analyses and network localization.\n\nSignal mixing leads to two distinct kinds of false-positive observations: artificial interactions (AI) caused directly by mixing and spurious interactions (SI) arising indirectly from the spread of signals from true interacting sources to nearby false loci. To date, several interaction metrics have been developed to solve the AI problem, but the SI problem has remained largely intractable in MEG/EEG all-to-all source connectivity studies. Here, we advance a novel approach for correcting SIs in FC analyses using source-reconstructed MEG/EEG data.\n\nOur approach is to bundle observed FC connections into hyperedges by their adjacency in signal mixing. Using realistic simulations, we show here that bundling yields hyperedges with good separability of true positives and little loss in the true positive rate. Hyperedge bundling thus significantly decreases graph noise by minimizing the false-positive to true-positive ratio. Finally, we demonstrate the advantage of edge bundling in the visualization of large-scale cortical networks with real MEG data. We propose that hypergraphs yielded by bundling represent well the set of true cortical interactions that are detectable and dissociable in MEG/EEG connectivity analysis.\n\nHighlightsO_LIA true interaction often is \"ghosted\" into a multitude of spurious edges (SI)\nC_LIO_LIEffective in controlling and illustrating SI\nC_LIO_LIHyperedges have much improved TPR and graph quality\nC_LIO_LIAdvantages in visualizing connectivity\nC_LI

neuroscience↗