Biology subjects

Waldron, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Waldron, L..

18 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Large-scale Manual Curation and Harmonization of Metadata from Metagenomic and Cancer Genomic Repositories: Challenges and Solutions

Public omics repositories contain vast amounts of valuable data, but their metadata suffers from extreme heterogeneity, unstandardized terminologies, and quality issues that severely limit data reusability and cross-study integration. While prospective metadata standards exist, the majority of published omics data remain in non-standardized formats requiring retrospective curation. We performed comprehensive manual curation and harmonization of clinical metadata from 212,027 samples across 468 studies in two major repositories: curatedMetagenomicData (93 studies, 22,588 samples) and cBioPortal (375 studies, 189,438 samples). Through systematic ontology mapping, we consolidated redundant, dispersed information into much fewer harmonized columns, reduced unique values, and increased the completeness of major attributes. This curation process revealed common metadata quality issues, including typos, inconsistent terminologies, misplaced values, conflicting annotations, and inappropriately merged information across attributes. We document the challenges, decisions, and solutions encountered during large-scale metadata harmonization across two distinct omics domains. The harmonized metadata, accessible through the OmicsMLRepoR Bioconductor package, enables repository-wide queries and cross-study analyses previously challenging with heterogeneous metadata. Our experience provides practical guidance for similar curation efforts and demonstrates the value of investing in retrospective metadata improvement for existing public omics resources.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2025

Orchestrating Spatial Transcriptomics Analysis with Bioconductor

Spatial transcriptomics technologies provide spatially-resolved measurements of gene expression through assays that can either target selected genes or capture transcriptome-wide expression profiles. The complexity and variability of these technologies and their associated data necessitate multi-step workflows integrating diverse computational methods and software packages. We provide a freely accessible, open-source, continuously updated and tested online book containing reproducible code examples, datasets, and discussion about data analysis workflows for spatial omics data using Bioconductor in R, including interoperability with Python.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2025

Orchestrating Microbiome Analysis with Bioconductor

The expansion of microbiome research has led to the accumulation of interlinked datasets encompassing versatile taxonomic and functional assays. The analysis of increasingly large and heterogeneous multi-modal microbiome data would benefit from unified approaches supporting the design of modular data science workflows through interoperable methods. The Bioconductor project has recently developed an optimized statistical programming framework for multi-assay data integration. Building on this foundation, we introduce a community-developed open source ecosystem for microbiome data science. In contrast to the previous alternatives, the methodology is specifically designed to support joint analysis of hierarchical, interlinked, and heterogeneous multi-table datasets that are increasingly common in modern microbiome research. This data science ecosystem encompasses open data, methods, tutorials, and an active online community. These resources support standardized and reproducible data wrangling, joint analysis, and reporting. We have detailed the functionality and usage in the online book https://microbiome.github.io/OMA, which offers guidance for prospective users and contributors.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2025

Benchmarking large-scale single-cell RNA-seq analysis

The increasing size of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) datasets poses major computational challenges. This work benchmarks the scalability, efficiency, and accuracy of five widely used analysis frameworks (Seurat, OSCA, scrap-per, Scanpy, and rapids singlecell), focusing on the impact of algorithmic and infrastructural choices on performance. We performed a systematic comparison of these workflows using representative datasets, including a 1.3 million mouse brain cell dataset for scalability and three smaller datasets (BE1, scMixology, and cord blood CITE-seq) with ground truth labels to assess clustering accuracy. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used as a paradigmatic step to evaluate the computational performance of six SVD algorithms (exact, ARPACK, IRLBA, randomized, Jacobi, and incremental PCA) across multiple data representations (dense, sparse, HDF5) and hardware configurations (CPU vs GPU). All methods showed high concordance in PCA results, with negligible loss of accuracy in truncated approaches. GPU-based computation using rapids singlecell provided a 15x speed-up over the best CPU methods, with moderate memory usage. On CPU, ARPACK and IRLBA were the most efficient for sparse matrices, while randomized SVD performed best for HDF5-backed data. Among full pipelines, rapids singlecell was the fastest, whereas OSCA and scrapper achieved the highest clustering accuracy (ARI up to 0.97) in datasets with known cell identities. Performance differences were largely driven by the choice of highly variable genes (HVGs) and PCA implementation. The study highlights that scalability in scRNA-seq analysis depends critically on both algorithmic and infrastructural factors. GPU acceleration and optimized BLAS/LAPACK configurations markedly enhance performance, while Bioconductor-based pipelines remain robust in accuracy. The provided benchmarks offer practical guidelines for efficient and reliable analysis of large-scale single-cell datasets.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2021

High-sensitivity pattern discovery in large, paired multi-omic datasets

Modern biological screens yield enormous numbers of measurements, and identifying and interpreting statistically significant associations among features is essential. Here, we present a novel hierarchical framework, HAllA (Hierarchical All-against-All association testing), for structured association discovery between paired high-dimensional datasets. HAllA efficiently integrates hierarchical hypothesis testing with false discovery rate correction to reveal significant linear and non-linear block-wise relationships among continuous and/or categorical data. We optimized and evaluated HAllA using heterogeneous synthetic datasets of known association structure, where HAllA outperformed all-against-all and other block testing approaches across a range of common similarity measures. We then applied HAllA to a series of real-world multi-omics datasets, revealing new associations between gene expression and host immune activity, the microbiome and host transcriptome, metabolomic profiling, and human health phenotypes. An open-source implementation of HAllA is freely available at http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/halla along with documentation, demo datasets, and a user group. Author SummaryModern scientific datasets increasingly include multiple measurements of many complementary data types. Here, we present HAllA, a method and implementation that overcomes the statistical challenges presented by data of this type by using feature similarity within each dataset to find statistically significant groups of features between them. We applied HAllA to simulated and real datasets, showing that HAllA outperformed existing procedures and identified compelling biological relationships. HAllA is widely applicable to diverse data structures and presents the user with grouped results that are easier to interpret than traditional methods.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2021

GenomicSuperSignature: interpretation of RNA-seq experiments through robust, efficient comparison to public databases

Millions of transcriptomic profiles have been deposited in public archives, yet remain underused for the interpretation of new experiments. We present a novel method for interpreting new transcriptomic datasets through near-instantaneous comparison to public archives without high-performance computing requirements. We performed Principal Component Analysis on 536 studies comprising 44,890 RNA sequencing profiles. Sufficiently similar loading vectors were aggregated to form Replicable Axes of Variation (RAV). RAVs were annotated with metadata of originating studies and samples and by gene set enrichment analysis. Functionality to associate new datasets with RAVs, extract interpretable annotations, and provide intuitive visualization are implemented as the GenomicSuperSignature R/Bioconductor package. We demonstrated the efficient and coherent database searching, robustness to batch effects and heterogeneous training data, and transfer learning capacity of our method using TCGA and rare diseases datasets. GenomicSuperSignature will aid analyzing new gene expression data in the context of existing databases using minimal computing resources. PURPOSEMillions of transcriptomic profiles have been deposited in public archives, yet remain underused for the interpretation of new experiments. Existing methods for leveraging these public resources have focused on the reanalysis of existing data or analysis of new datasets independently. We present a novel approach to interpreting new transcriptomic datasets by near-instantaneous comparison to public archives without high-performance computing requirements. METHODSTo identify replicable and interpretable axes of variation in any given gene expression dataset, we performed Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on 536 studies comprising 44,890 RNA sequencing profiles. Sufficiently similar loading vectors, when compared across studies, were aggregated to form Replicable Axes of Variation (RAV). RAVs were annotated with metadata of originating studies and samples and by gene set enrichment analysis. Functionality to associate new datasets with RAVs, extract interpretable annotations, and provide intuitive visualization are implemented as the GenomicSuperSignature R/Bioconductor package. RESULTSRAVs are robust to batch effects and the presence of low-quality or irrelevant studies, and identify signals that can be lost by merging samples across the training datasets. The GenomicSuperSignature package allows instantaneous matching of PCA axes in new datasets to pre-computed RAVs, cutting down the analysis time from days to the order of seconds on an ordinary laptop. We demonstrate that RAVs associated with a phenotype can provide insight into weak or indirectly measured biological attributes in a new study by leveraging accumulated data from published datasets. Benchmarking against complementary previous works demonstrates that the RAV index 1) identifies colorectal carcinoma transcriptome subtypes that are similar to but more correlated with clinicopathological characteristics than previous disease-specific efforts and 2) can estimate neutrophil counts through transfer learning on new data comparably to the previous efforts despite major differences in training datasets and model building processes with the additional benefits of flexibility and scalability of the model application. CONCLUSIONGenomicSuperSignature establishes an information resource and software tools to interrogate it. Prior knowledge databases are coherently linked, enabling researchers to analyze new gene expression data in the context of existing databases using minimal computing resources. The robustness of GenomicSuperSignature suggests that we can expand this approach beyond human gene expression profiles, such as single-cell RNA-seq, microbiome abundance, and different species transcriptomics datasets.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2021

{-}Multivariable Association Discovery in Population-scale Meta-omics Studies

It is challenging to associate features such as human health outcomes, diet, environmental conditions, or other metadata to microbial community measurements, due in part to their quantitative properties. Microbiome multi-omics are typically noisy, sparse (zero-inflated), high-dimensional, extremely non-normal, and often in the form of count or compositional measurements. Here we introduce an optimized combination of novel and established methodology to assess multivariable association of microbial community features with complex metadata in population-scale observational studies. Our approach, MaAsLin 2 (Microbiome Multivariable Associations with Linear Models), uses general linear models to accommodate a wide variety of modern epidemiological studies, including cross-sectional and longitudinal designs, as well as a variety of data types (e.g. counts and relative abundances) with or without covariates and repeated measurements. To construct this method, we conducted a large-scale evaluation of a broad range of scenarios under which straightforward identification of meta-omics associations can be challenging. These simulation studies reveal that MaAsLin 2s linear model preserves statistical power in the presence of repeated measures and multiple covariates, while accounting for the nuances of meta-omics features and controlling false discovery. We also applied MaAsLin 2 to a microbial multi-omics dataset from the Integrative Human Microbiome (HMP2) project which, in addition to reproducing established results, revealed a unique, integrated landscape of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) across multiple time points and omics profiles.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2020

SIMON: open-source knowledge discovery platform

Data analysis and knowledge discovery has become more and more important in biology and medicine with the increasing complexity of the biological datasets, but necessarily sophisticated programming skills and in-depth understanding of algorithms needed pose barriers to most biologists and clinicians to perform such research. We have developed a modular open-source software SIMON to facilitate the application of 180+ state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms to high-dimensional biomedical data. With an easy to use graphical user interface, standardized pipelines, automated approach for machine learning and other statistical analysis methods, SIMON helps to identify optimal algorithms and provides a resource that empowers non-technical and technical researchers to identify crucial patterns in biomedical data.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Towards a gold standard for benchmarking gene set enrichment analysis

BackgroundAlthough gene set enrichment analysis has become an integral part of high-throughput gene expression data analysis, the assessment of enrichment methods remains rudimentary and ad hoc. In the absence of suitable gold standards, evaluations are commonly restricted to selected data sets and biological reasoning on the relevance of resulting enriched gene sets. However, this is typically incomplete and biased towards the goals of individual investigations.\n\nResultsWe present a general framework for standardized and structured benchmarking of enrichment methods based on defined criteria for applicability, gene set prioritization, and detection of relevant processes. This framework incorporates a curated compendium of 75 expression data sets investigating 42 different human diseases. The compendium features microarray and RNA-seq measurements, and each dataset is associated with a precompiled GO/KEGG relevance ranking for the corresponding disease under investigation. We perform a comprehensive assessment of 10 major enrichment methods on the benchmark compendium, identifying significant differences in (i) runtime and applicability to RNA-seq data, (ii) fraction of enriched gene sets depending on the type of null hypothesis tested, and (iii) recovery of the a priori defined relevance rankings. Based on these findings, we make practical recommendations on (i) how methods originally developed for microarray data can efficiently be applied to RNA-seq data, (ii) how to interpret results depending on the type of gene set test conducted, and (iii) which methods are best suited to effectively prioritize gene sets with high relevance for the phenotype investigated.\n\nConclusionWe carried out a systematic assessment of existing enrichment methods, and identified best performing methods, but also general shortcomings in how gene set analysis is currently conducted. We provide a directly executable benchmark system for straightforward assessment of additional enrichment methods.\n\nAvailabilityhttp://bioconductor.org/packages/GSEABenchmarkeR

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2019

Orchestrating Single-Cell Analysis with Bioconductor

Recent developments in experimental technologies such as single-cell RNA sequencing have enabled the profiling a high-dimensional number of genome-wide features in individual cells, inspiring the formation of large-scale data generation projects quantifying unprecedented levels of biological variation at the single-cell level. The data generated in such projects exhibits unique characteristics, including increased sparsity and scale, in terms of both the number of features and the number of samples. Due to these unique characteristics, specialized statistical methods are required along with fast and efficient software implementations in order to successfully derive biological insights. Bioconductor - an open-source, open-development software project based on the R programming language - has pioneered the analysis of such high-throughput, high-dimensional biological data, leveraging a rich history of software and methods development that has spanned the era of sequencing. Featuring state-of-the-art computational methods, standardized data infrastructure, and interactive data visualization tools that are all easily accessible as software packages, Bioconductor has made it possible for a diverse audience to analyze data derived from cutting-edge single-cell assays. Here, we present an overview of single-cell RNA sequencing analysis for prospective users and contributors, highlighting the contributions towards this effort made by Bioconductor.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2019

Multi-omic analysis supports a developmental hierarchy of molecular subtypes in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma

Multiple studies have identified transcriptome subtypes of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), but these have yet to impact clinical practice. Interpretation and translation of HGSOC subtypes are complicated by tumor evolution and polyclonality accompanied by accumulation of somatic aberrations, varying cell type admixtures, and different tissues of origin. The chronology of HGSOC subtype evolution was examined in the context of these factors by a novel integrative analysis of bulk absolute somatic copy number analysis and gene expression in The Cancer Genome Atlas, complemented by single-cell RNA-seq analysis of six independent tumors. The approach was validated by contrast to soft-tissue sarcoma. Genomic lesions associated with HGSOC subtypes tend to be subclonal, implying subtype divergence at later stages of tumor evolution. Subclonality of recurrent HGSOC alterations is particularly evident for proliferative tumors, characterized by extreme genomic instability, absence of immune infiltration, and greater patient age. In contrast, differentiated tumors are characterized by largely intact genome integrity, high immune infiltration, and younger patient age. We propose an alternative model to discrete subtypes of HGSOC, in which tumors develop from an early differentiated spectrum to a late proliferative spectrum, along a timeline characterized by increasing genomic instability and subclonal expansion. The proposed methods provide a new approach to investigating tumor evolution through multi-omic analysis. Statement of SignificanceThis study proposes a method to infer whether transcriptome-based groupings of tumors differentiate early in carcinogenesis and are therefore potentially appropriate targets for therapy, and demonstrates that this is not the case for high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). Significant findings for HGSOC include: O_LITumor purity, ploidy, and subclonality can be reliably inferred from different genomic platforms and show marked differences between subtypes C_LIO_LIRecurrent DNA alterations are associated with subtypes and tend to occur more frequently in subclones C_LIO_LISingle-cell sequencing of 42,000 tumor cells reveals widespread heterogeneity in tumor cell type composition that drives bulk subtype calls, but demonstrates a lack of intrinsic subtypes among tumor epithelial cells C_LIO_LIFindings prompt the dismissal of discrete transcriptome subtypes for HGSOC and replacement by a more realistic model of continuous tumor development that includes mixtures of subclones, accumulation of somatic aberrations, infiltration of immune and stromal cells in proportions correlated with tissue of origin and tumor stage, and evolution between properties previously associated with discrete subtypes C_LI

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Reliable analysis of clinical tumor-only whole exome sequencing data

BackgroundAllele-specific copy number alteration (CNA) analysis is essential to study the functional impact of single nucleotide variants (SNV) and the process of tumorigenesis. Most commonly used tools in the field rely on high quality genome-wide data with matched normal profiles, limiting their applicability in clinical settings. MethodsWe propose a workflow, based on the open-source PureCN R/Bioconductor package in conjunction with widely used variant-calling and copy number segmentation algorithms, for allele-specific CNA analysis from whole exome sequencing (WES) without matched normals. We use The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) ovarian carcinoma (OV) and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) datasets to benchmark its performance against gold standard SNP6 microarray and WES datasets with matched normal samples. Our workflow further classifies SNVs by somatic status and then uses this information to infer somatic mutational signatures and tumor mutational burden (TMB). ResultsApplication of our workflow to tumor-only WES data produces tumor purity and ploidy estimates that are highly concordant with estimates from SNP6 microarray data and matched-normal WES data. The presence of cancer type-specific somatic mutational signatures was inferred with high accuracy. We also demonstrate high concordance of TMB between our tumor-only workflow and matched normal pipelines. ConclusionThe proposed workflow provides, to our knowledge, the only open-source option for comprehensive allele-specific CNA analysis and SNV classification of tumor-only WES with demonstrated high accuracy.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

The impact of stroma on the discovery of molecular subtypes and prognostic gene signatures in serous ovarian cancer

PurposeRecent efforts to improve outcomes for high-grade serous ovarian cancer, a leading cause of cancer death in women, have focused on identifying molecular subtypes and prognostic gene signatures, but existing subtypes have poor cross-study robustness. We tested the contribution of cell admixture in published ovarian cancer molecular subtypes and prognostic gene signatures.\n\nExperimental DesignPublic gene expression data, two molecular subtype classifications, and 61 published gene signatures of ovarian cancer were examined. Using microdissected data, we developed gene signatures of ovarian tumor and stroma. Computational simulations of increasing stromal cell proportion were performed by mixing gene expression profiles of paired microdissected ovarian tumor and stroma.\n\nResultsEstablished ovarian cancer molecular subtypes are strongly associated with the cell admixture. Tumors were classified as different molecular subtypes in simulations, when the percentage of stromal cells increased. Stromal gene expression in bulk tumor was weakly prognostic, and in one dataset, increased stroma was associated with anatomic sampling location. Five published prognostic gene signatures were no longer prognostic in a multivariate model that adjusted for stromal content alone.\n\nConclusionsThe discovery that molecular subtypes of high grade serous ovarian cancer is influenced by cell admixture, and stromal cell gene expression is crucial for interpretation and reproduction of ovarian cancer molecular subtypes and gene signatures derived from bulk tissue. Single cell analysis may be required to refine the molecular subtypes of high grade serous ovarian cancer. Because stroma proportion was weakly prognostic, elucidating the role of the tumor microenvironments components will be important.\n\nTranslational relevanceOvarian cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in women in the United States. Although the tumor responds to standard therapy for the majority of patients, it frequently recurs and becomes drug-resistant. Recent efforts have focused on identifying molecular subtypes and prognostic gene signatures of ovarian cancer in order to tailor therapy and improve outcomes. This study demonstrates that molecular subtype identification depends on the ratio of tumor to stroma within the specimen. We show that the specific anatomic location of the biopsy may influence the proportion of stromal involvement and potentially the resulting gene expression pattern. It will be crucial for these factors to be taken into consideration when interpreting and reproducing ovarian cancer molecular subtypes and gene signatures derived using bulk tissue and single cells. Furthermore, it will be important to define the relative proportions of stromal cells and model their prognostic importance in the tumor microenvironment.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

The impact of different sources of heterogeneity on loss of accuracy from genomic prediction models

Cross-study validation (CSV) of prediction models is an alternative to traditional cross-validation (CV) in domains where multiple comparable datasets are available. Although many studies have noted potential sources of heterogeneity in genomic studies, to our knowledge none have system atically investigated their intertwined impacts on prediction accuracy across studies. We employ a hybrid parametric/non-parametric bootstrap method to realistically simulate publicly available compendia of microarray, RNA-seq, and whole metagenome shotgun (WMS) microbiome studies of health outcomes. Three types of heterogeneity between studies are manipulated and studied: imbalances in the prevalence of clinical and pathological covariates, 2) differences in gene covariance that could be caused by batch, platform, or tumor purity effects, and 3) differences in the \"true\" model that associates gene expression and clinical factors to outcome. We assess model accuracy while altering these factors. Lower accuracy is seen in CSV than in CV. Surprisingly, heterogeneity in known clinical covariates and differences in gene covariance structure have very limited contributions in the loss of accuracy when validating in new studies. However, forcing identical generative models greatly reduces the within/across study difference. These results, observed consistently for multiple disease outcomes and omics platforms, suggest that the most easily identifiable sources of study heterogeneity are not necessarily the primary ones that undermine the ability to accurately replicate the accuracy of omics prediction models in new studies. Unidentified heterogeneity, such as could arise from unmeasured confounding, may be more important.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

HMP16SData: Efficient Access to the Human Microbiome Project through Bioconductor

Phase 1 of the NIH Human Microbiome Project (HMP) investigated 18 body subsites of 239 healthy American adults, to produce the first comprehensive reference for the composition and variation of the \"healthy\" human microbiome. Publicly-available data sets from amplicon sequencing of two 16S rRNA variable regions, with extensive controlled-access participant data, provide a reference for ongoing microbiome studies. However, utilization of these data sets can be hindered by the complex bioinformatic steps required to access, import, decrypt, and merge the various components in formats suitable for ecological and statistical analysis. The HMP16SData package provides count data for both 16S variable regions, integrated with phylogeny, taxonomy, public participant data, and controlled participant data for authorized researchers, using standard integrative Bioconductor data objects. By removing bioinformatic hurdles of data access and management, HMP16SData enables epidemiologists with only basic R skills to quickly analyze HMP data.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2017

Consensus on Molecular Subtypes of Ovarian Cancer

INTRODUCTIONVarious computational methods for gene expression-based subtyping of high-grade serous (HGS) ovarian cancer have been proposed. This resulted in the identification of molecular subtypes that are based on different datasets and were differentially validated, making it difficult to achieve consensus on which definitions to use in follow-up studies. We assess three major subtype classifiers for their robustness and association to outcome by a meta-analysis of publicly available expression data, and provide a classifier that represents their consensus.\n\nMETHODSWe use a compendium of 15 microarray datasets consisting of 1,774 HGS ovarian tumors to assess 1) concordance between published subtyping algorithms, 2) robustness of those algorithms to re-clustering across datasets, and 3) association of subtypes with overall survival. A consensus classifier is trained on concordantly classified samples, and validated by leave-one-dataset-out validation.\n\nRESULTSEach subtyping classifier identified subsets significantly differing in overall survival, but were not robust to re-fitting in independent datasets and grouped only approximately one third of patients concordantly into four subtypes. We propose a consensus classifier to identify the minority of unambiguously classifiable tumors across multiple gene expression platforms, using a 100-gene signature. The resulting consensus subtypes correlate with patient age, survival, tumor purity, and lymphocyte infiltration.\n\nCONCLUSIONSOur analysis demonstrates that most HGS ovarian cancers are not able to be subtyped. A minority of tumors can be classified and our proposed consensus classifier consolidates and improves on the robustness of three previously proposed subtype classifiers. It provides reliable stratification of patients with HGS ovarian tumors of clearly defined subtype, and will assist in studying the role of polyclonality in the majority of tumors that are not robustly classifiable.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Software For The Integration Of Multi-Omics Experiments In Bioconductor

Multi-omics experiments are increasingly commonplace in biomedical research, and add layers of complexity to experimental design, data integration, and analysis. R and Bioconductor provide a generic framework for statistical analysis and visualization, as well as specialized data classes for a variety of high-throughput data types, but methods are lacking for integrative analysis of multi-omics experiments. The MultiAssayExperiment software package, implemented in R and leveraging Bioconductor software and design principles, provides for the coordinated representation of, storage of, and operation on multiple diverse genomics data. We provide all of the multiple omics data for each cancer tissue in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) as ready-to-analyze MultiAssayExperiment objects, and demonstrate in these and other datasets how the software simplifies data representation, statistical analysis, and visualization. The MultiAssayExperiment Bioconductor package reduces major obstacles to efficient, scalable and reproducible statistical analysis of multi-omics data and enhances data science applications of multiple omics datasets.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2017

Accessible, curated metagenomic data through ExperimentHub

We present curatedMetagenomicData, a Bioconductor and command-line interface to thousands of metagenomic profiles from the Human Microbiome Project and other publicly available datasets, and ExperimentHub, a platform for convenient cloud-based distribution of data to the R desktop. The resource provides standardized per-participant metadata linked to bacterial, fungal, archaeal, and viral taxonomic abundances, as well as quantitative metabolic functional profiles. The datasets can be immediately analyzed in R or other software with a minimum of bioinformatic expertise and no preprocessing of data. We demonstrate identification of taxonomic/functional correlations, an investigation of gut \"enterotypes\", and a comparison of the accuracy of disease classification from different data types. These documented analyses can be reproduced efficiently on a laptop, without the barriers of working with large-scale, raw sequencing data. The building and expansion of curatedMetagenomicData is based entirely on open source software and pipelines, to facilitate the addition of new microbiome datasets and methods.

bioinformatics↗