bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Vuorio, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Vuorio, J..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Targeting a broad spectrum of KRAS-mutant cancers by hyperactivation-induced cell death

The KRAS oncogene drives many common and highly fatal malignancies. These include pancreatic, lung, and colorectal cancer, where numerous different activating KRAS mutations have made the development of KRAS inhibitors difficult. Here we identify the scaffold protein SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domain 3 (SHANK3) as a RAS interactor that binds overactive mutant forms to limit oncogenic KRAS signalling and maintain RAS- activity at an optimal level. Depletion of SHANK3 results in hyperactivation of KRAS/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling, which in turn selectively induces MAPK/ERK-dependent cell death in KRAS-mutant cancers. Furthermore, targeting of this therapeutic vulnerability through nanobody- or RNA interference- mediated disruption of the SHANK3-KRAS interaction reduces tumour growth in vivo. Thus, inhibition of the SHANK3-KRAS interaction represents a new pan-KRAS-mutant compatible strategy for selective killing of KRAS- mutant cancer cells through excessive signalling. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=190 SRC="FIGDIR/small/508660v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (32K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@87e71forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@56cf94org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1561136org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@183f711_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Schematic model of SHANK3-controlled cell fate in KRAS-mutant cancers. SHANK3 directly interacts with KRAS and competes with RAF for KRAS binding to sustain oncogenic RAS-MAPK/ERK signalling at an optimal level (i.e. below toxic oncogenic signalling) in KRAS-mutant cancers. SHANK3 silencing (1) and inhibition of SHANK3-KRAS interaction (2) drive KRAS-mutant cells into cell death.

cancer biology↗

Conformational dynamics regulate SHANK3 actin and Rap1 binding

Actin-rich cellular protrusions direct versatile biological processes from cancer cell invasion to dendritic spine development. The stability, morphology and specific biological function of these protrusions are regulated by crosstalk between three main signaling axes: integrins, actin regulators and small GTPases. SHANK3 is a multifunctional scaffold protein, interacting with several actin-binding proteins, and a well-established autism risk gene. Recently, SHANK3 was demonstrated to sequester integrin-activating small GTPases Rap1 and R-Ras to inhibit integrin activity via its N-terminal SPN domain. Here, we demonstrate that SHANK3 interacts directly with actin using its SPN domain. Actin binding can be inhibited by an intramolecular closed conformation of SHANK3, where the adjacent ARR domain covers the actin-binding interface of the SPN domain. Actin and Rap1 compete with each other for binding to SHANK3 and loss of SHANK3-actin binding augments inhibition of Rap1-mediated integrin activity. This dynamic crosstalk has functional implications for filopodia formation in cancer cells, dendritic spine morphology in neurons and autism-linked phenotypes in vivo.

cell biology↗

N-glycosylation blocks and simultaneously fosters different receptor-ligand binding sites: the chameleonic CD44-hyaluronan interaction

While DNA encodes protein structure, glycans provide a complementary layer of information to protein function. As a prime example of the significance of glycans, the ability of the cell surface receptor CD44 to bind its ligand, hyaluronan, is modulated by N-glycosylation. However, the details of this modulation remain unclear. Based on atomistic simulations and NMR, we provide evidence that CD44 has multiple distinct binding sites for hyaluronan, and that N-glycosylation modulates their respective roles. We find that non-glycosylated CD44 favors the canonical sub-micromolar binding site, while glycosylated CD44 binds hyaluronan with an entirely different micromolar binding site. Our findings show (for the first time) how glycosylation can alter receptor affinity by shielding specific regions of the host protein, thereby promoting weaker binding modes. The mechanism revealed in this work emphasizes the importance of glycosylation in protein function and poses a challenge for protein structure determination where glycosylation is usually neglected.

molecular biology↗