bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Vriend, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Vriend, C..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

The ENIGMA-PD-WML Pipeline: A Containerized, User-Friendly Approach for Accurate, Standardized Segmentation of White Matter Lesions in Multi-Site MRI Data

Understanding vascular contributions to disease is a major unmet need. White matter lesions (WML) are an accepted imaging marker of cerebral small vessel disease, giving insights into its related pathologies. A unified approach for WML analyses in large multi-site data is lacking despite the need for pooling of data to overcome the limitations of often small heterogenous MRI studies which make subtyping and identifying patterns within disease groups difficult. Our ENIGMA-PD-WML pipeline is an open-source containerized pipeline containing all the code and packages required for pre-processing, processing and post-processing of T1-weighted and FLAIR data, outputting accurate and reproducible binary WML maps using a UNet approach. The pipeline provides a standardized image analysis approach for WML and outputs data in both native and MNI space to allow for sharing and pooling of data from multiple sites for large-data analysis. In addition to a reliable standardized approach for WML segmentation, key priorities when developing the pipeline included: usability, i.e., requiring minimal manual input and technical expertise to use, and suitability to run on various MRI scanners and acquisition parameters as is common in multi-site data. This paper describes the pipeline in detail, with rationale for each step, providing transparency and facilitating its usage to overcome reproducibility issues in large-scale WML analyses.

neuroscience↗

Comparison of Automated White Matter Lesion Segmentation Approaches for Use in Large, Multi-Site Data Analyses in Parkinson's Disease

BackgroundParkinsons disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder. PD currently lacks effective disease-modifying treatments, likely due to its diverse clinical features and underlying neuropathology. The vascular role in PD is emerging, with vascular mechanisms increasingly implicated, yet the literature remains conflicted, motivating large-data analyses with greater statistical power. White matter lesions (WML) are an accepted imaging marker of small vessel disease. Accurate automated WML segmentation techniques are crucial for large-scale studies in PD due to the impracticality of manual segmentation for extensive datasets and to ensure consistency. Evaluation of the optimum approach in PD for large-scale analysis is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate various automated WML segmentation algorithms to determine the most accurate and reliable method, among those selected, for assessing WML for multi-site large data analysis in PD. MethodsWe assessed whole-brain volumetric T1-weighted and FLAIR images from 201 PD patients (mean age, 66.6 {+/-} 7.86 years) and 64 healthy controls (HC; mean age, 66.3 {+/-} 8.67) across three datasets: the Parkinsons Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI), the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) and the Montreal Neurological Institute Biobank: Clinical Biological Imaging and Genetic Repository (C-BIG). The sample included different scanners, imaging parameters and lesion loads, as would be expected for multi-site data. WML were manually segmented to provide the gold standard, and four freely available automated algorithms were evaluated: FSLs BIANCA, FreeSurfer, SPMs LST-LPA and U-Net-pgs using the performance metrics: Dice score, Hausdorff distance, recall, precision, F1 score, log absolute volume difference (LOGAVD) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Subgroup analyses were performed based on lesion load and lobar regions. The associations of data from these automated approaches with age, and with Fazekas and Wahlund visual rating scales, were assessed through partial correlation analysis. ResultsU-Net-pgs performed best overall, with the highest Dice score (PD: 0.46 {+/-} 0.21; HC: 0.39 {+/-} 0.21), recall (PD: 0.76 {+/-} 0.25; HC: 0.62 {+/-} 0.31), precision (PD: 0.49 {+/-} 0.25; HC: 0.63 {+/-} 0.27), F1 score (PD: 0.54 {+/-} 0.22; HC: 0.56 {+/-} 0.22) and ICC (PD: 0.965; HC: 0.967) and lowest Hausdorff distance (PD: 8.89 {+/-} 3.96; HC: 6.33 {+/-} 2.91). U-Net-pgs achieved the lowest LOGAVD in the PD group (0.31 {+/-} 0.31) whereas BIANCA-LOO with a threshold of 0.9 was lowest in HC (0.27 {+/-} 0.30). U-Net also showed superior performances in all lesion loads for PD and overall across various brain regions in both PD and HC. ConclusionOverall, U-Net-pgs emerged as the best performing automated method, of those we evaluated, for WML segmentation in PD and HC within a dataset collected with various scanner and image acquisition parameters. U-Net-pgs consistently outperformed other automated approaches across lesion loads and brain regions, for most metrics. The accuracy and reliability of U-Net-pgs make it a promising tool for large-scale analyses, facilitating future research investigating WML in PD.

neuroscience↗

Open neuroinformatics infrastructure ecosystem for federated multisite studies

Despite growing understanding of the benefits of having Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) data, many datasets still cannot be shared. Federated analysis methods can enable multisite studies that do not require the sharing of participant-level information. However, there are many practical hurdles that prevent the large-scale adoption of federated methods. We discuss challenges related to cross-site data preparation for federated learning, present solutions offered by recent neuroinformatics projects, and showcase an example of tool integration applied to neurodegenerative disease data.

neuroscience↗

Multimodal multilayer network centrality relates to executive functioning

Executive functioning is a higher-order cognitive process that is thought to depend on a brain network organization facilitating network integration across specialized subnetworks. The frontoparietal network (FPN), a subnetwork that has diverse connections to other brain modules, seems pivotal to this integration, and a more central role of regions in the FPN has been related to better executive functioning. Brain networks can be constructed using different modalities: diffusion MRI (dMRI) can be used to reconstruct structural networks, while resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) yield functional networks. These networks are often studied in a unimodal way, which cannot capture potential complementary or synergistic modal information. The multilayer framework is a relatively new approach that allows for the integration of different modalities into one network of networks. It has already yielded promising results in the field of neuroscience, having been related to e.g. cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimers disease. Multilayer analyses thus have the potential to help us better understand the relation between brain network organization and executive functioning. Here, we hypothesized a positive association between centrality of the FPN and executive functioning, and we expected that multimodal multilayer centrality would supersede unilayer centrality in explaining executive functioning. We used dMRI, rsfMRI, MEG, and neuropsychological data obtained from 33 healthy adults (age range 22-70 years) to construct eight modality-specific unilayer networks (dMRI, fMRI, and six MEG frequency bands), as well as a multilayer network comprising all unilayer networks. Interlayer links in the multilayer network were present only between a nodes counterpart across layers. We then computed and averaged eigenvector centrality of the nodes within the FPN for every uni- and multilayer network and used multiple regression models to examine the relation between uni- or multilayer centrality and executive functioning. We found that higher multilayer FPN centrality, but not unilayer FPN centrality, was related to better executive functioning. To further validate multilayer FPN centrality as a relevant measure, we assessed its relation with age. Network organization has been shown to change across the life span, becoming increasingly efficient up to middle age and regressing to a more segregated topology at higher age. Indeed, the relation between age and multilayer centrality followed an inverted-U shape. These results show the importance of FPN integration for executive functioning as well as the value of a multilayer framework in network analyses of the brain. Multilayer network analysis may particularly advance our understanding of the interplay between different brain network aspects in clinical populations, where network alterations differ across modalities. HighlightsO_LIMultimodal neuroimaging and neurophysiology data were collected in healthy adults C_LIO_LIMultilayer frontoparietal centrality was positively associated with executive functioning C_LIO_LIUnilayer (unimodal) centralities were not associated with executive functioning C_LIO_LIThere was an inverted-U relationship between multilayer centrality and age C_LI

neuroscience↗

A hands-on tutorial on network and topological neuroscience

The brain is an extraordinarily complex system that facilitates the efficient integration of information from different regions to execute its functions. With the recent advances in technology, researchers can now collect enormous amounts of data from the brain using neuroimaging at different scales and from numerous modalities. With that comes the need for sophisticated tools for analysis. The field of network neuroscience has been trying to tackle these challenges, and graph theory has been one of its essential branches through the investigation of brain networks. Recently, topological data analysis has gained more attention as an alternative framework by providing a set of metrics that go beyond pair-wise connections and offer improved robustness against noise. In this hands-on tutorial, our goal is to provide the computational tools to explore neuroimaging data using these frameworks and to facilitate their accessibility, data visualisation, and comprehension for newcomers to the field. We will start by giving a concise (and by no means complete) overview of the field to introduce the two frameworks, and then explain how to compute both well-established and newer metrics on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. We use an open-source language (Python) and provide an accompanying publicly available Jupyter Notebook that uses data from the 1000 Functional Connectomes Project. Moreover, we would like to highlight one part of our notebook that is solely dedicated to realistic visualisation of high order interactions in brain networks. This pipeline provides three-dimensional (3-D) plots of pair-wise and higher-order interactions projected in a brain atlas, a new feature tailor-made for network neuroscience.

neuroscience↗

Resting-state and task-based centrality of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex predict resilience to inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

BackgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used to investigate normal brain function in healthy participants and as a treatment for brain disorders. Various subject factors can influence individual response to rTMS, including brain network properties.\n\nObjective/HypothesisA previous study by our group showed that virtually lesioning the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC; important for cognitive flexibility) using inhibitory rTMS reduced performance on a set-shifting task. We aimed to determine whether this behavioural response was related to topological features of pre-TMS resting-state and task-based functional networks.\n\nMethodsInhibitory (1Hz) rTMS was applied to the left dlPFC in 16 healthy participants, and to the vertex in 17 participants as a control condition. Participants performed a set-shifting task during fMRI at baseline and directly after a single rTMS session 1-2 weeks later. Functional network topology measures were calculated from resting-state and task-based fMRI scans using graph theoretical analysis.\n\nResultsThe dlPFC-stimulated group, but not the vertex group, showed reduced set shifting performance after rTMS associated with lower task-based betweenness centrality of the dlPFC at baseline (p=.030) and a smaller reduction in task-based betweenness centrality after rTMS (p=.024). Reduced repeat trial accuracy after rTMS was associated with higher baseline resting state node strength of the dlPFC (p=.017).\n\nConclusionsOur results suggest that behavioural response to inhibitory rTMS to the dlPFC is dependent on baseline functional network features. Individuals with more globally integrated stimulated regions show greater resilience to inhibitory rTMS, while individuals with more locally well-connected regions show greater vulnerability.\n\nHighlightsO_LIFunctional brain network properties predict behavioural response to 1Hz DLPFC rTMS\nC_LIO_LIGlobally integrated stimulated regions are resilient to effects of inhibitory rTMS\nC_LIO_LISegregated, locally well-connected regions are vulnerable to inhibitory rTMS\nC_LIO_LIChange in performance after rTMS correlates with change in network properties\nC_LI

neuroscience↗

Resting-state network topology and planning ability in healthy adults

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have been used extensively to investigate the brain areas that are recruited during the Tower of London (ToL) task. Nevertheless, little research has been devoted to study the neural correlates of the ToL task using a network approach. Here we investigated the association between functional connectivity and network topology during resting-state fMRI and ToL task performance, that was performed outside the scanner. Sixty-two (62) healthy subjects (21-74 years) underwent eyes-closed rsfMRI and performed the task on a laptop. We studied global (whole-brain) and within subnetwork resting-state topology as well as functional connectivity between subnetworks, with a focus on the default-mode, fronto-parietal and dorsal and ventral attention networks. Efficiency and clustering coefficient were calculated to measure network integration and segregation, respectively, at both the global and subnetwork level. Our main finding was that higher global efficiency was associated with slower performance ({beta} = .22, Pbca = .04) and this association seemed mainly driven by inter-individual differences in default-mode network connectivity. The reported results were independent from age, sex, education-level and motion. Although this finding is contrary to earlier findings on general cognition, we tentatively hypothesize that the reported association may indicate that individuals with a more integrated brain during the resting-state are less able to further increase network efficiency when transitioning from a rest to task state, leading to slower responses. This study also adds to a growing body of literature supporting a central role for the default-mode network in individual differences in cognitive performance.

neuroscience↗

Functional connectivity alterations in Parkinson’s disease during the stop-signal task

Although deficits in response inhibition are common in Parkinsons disease (PD), studies on their neural correlates are relatively scarce. In our previous study, medication-naive PD patients showed, among others, lower activation of the inhibition-related bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) compared with healthy controls while performing the stop-signal task. Here we report on a follow-up study in the same cohort.\n\nFourteen medicated PD patients and 16 healthy controls performed the same stop-signal task during MRI; 3.1{+/-}1.0 years after our previous study. During that time, all PD patients had started to use dopaminergic medication. We analyzed task-related functional activity and connectivity in the bilateral IFG and anterior insula, brain regions that are important response inhibition. Task-related functional connectivity was analyzed with generalized psychophysiological interaction.\n\nPD patients were significantly slower on response initiation (GO reaction time) and response inhibition (stop-signal reaction time) than healthy controls. There were no between-group differences in functional activity. On the other hand, functional connectivity of the IFG and anterior insula was significantly lower in PD compared with healthy controls. Mainly the inferior parietal lobule and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex were less connected with these seed regions.\n\nThese results show that early-stage medicated PD patients show lower task-related functional connectivity but not activity of brain regions that are important for response inhibition; the IFG and anterior insula. We tentatively speculate that the use of dopaminergic medication upheld task-related activity but not connectivity.

neuroscience↗