bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Volzhenin, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Volzhenin, K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

SENSE-PPI reconstructs protein-protein interactions of various complexities, within, across, and between species, with sequence-based evolutionary scale modeling and deep learning

Ab initio computational reconstructions of protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks will provide invaluable insights on cellular systems, enabling the discovery of novel molecular interactions and elucidating biological mechanisms within and between organisms. Leveraging latest generation protein language models and recurrent neural networks, we present SENSE-PPI, a sequence-based deep learning model that efficiently reconstructs ab initio PPIs, distinguishing partners among tens of thousands of proteins and identifying specific interactions within functionally similar proteins. SENSE-PPI demonstrates high accuracy, limited training requirements, and versatility in cross-species predictions, even with non-model organisms and human-virus interactions. Its performance decreases for phylogenetically more distant model and non-model organisms, but signal alteration is very slow. SENSE-PPI is state-of-the-art, outperforming all existing methods. In this regard, it demonstrates the important role of parameters in protein language models. SENSE-PPI is very fast and can test 10,000 proteins against themselves in a matter of hours, enabling the reconstruction of genome-wide proteomes. Graphical abstractSENSE-PPI is a general deep learning architecture predicting protein-protein interactions of different complexities, between stable proteins, between stable and intrinsically disordered proteins, within a species, and between species. Trained on one species, it accurately predicts interactions and reconstructs complete specialized subnetworks for model and non-model organisms, and trained on human-virus interactions, it predicts human-virus interactions for new viruses. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=187 SRC="FIGDIR/small/558413v3_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (63K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@106d345org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11883a6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6b07d9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d07138_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

bioinformatics↗

Multilevel Development of Cognitive Abilities in an Artificial Neural Network

Several neuronal mechanisms have been proposed to account for the formation of cognitive abilities through postnatal interactions with the physical and socio-cultural environment. Here, we introduce a three-level computational model of information processing and acquisition of cognitive abilities. We propose minimal architectural requirements to build these levels and how the parameters affect their performance and relationships. The first sensorimotor level handles local nonconscious processing, here during a visual classification task. The second level or cognitive level globally integrates the information from multiple local processors via long-ranged connections and synthesizes it in a global, but still nonconscious manner. The third and cognitively highest level handles the information globally and consciously. It is based on the Global Neuronal Workspace (GNW) theory and is referred to as conscious level. We use trace and delay conditioning tasks to, respectively, challenge the second and third levels. Results first highlight the necessity of epigenesis through selection and stabilization of synapses at both local and global scales to allow the network to solve the first two tasks. At the global scale, dopamine appears necessary to properly provide credit assignment despite the temporal delay between perception and reward. At the third level, the presence of interneurons becomes necessary to maintain a self-sustained representation within the GNW in the absence of sensory input. Finally, while balanced spontaneous intrinsic activity facilitates epigenesis at both local and global scales, the balanced excitatory-inhibitory ratio increases performance. Finally, we discuss the plausibility of the model in both neurodevelopmental and artificial intelligence terms.

neuroscience↗