bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Vindigni, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Vindigni, A..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

The BRCA1-A complex restricts replication fork reversal-dependent DNA repair in ATM deficient cells

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) kinase deficiency results in cancer susceptibility and drug sensitivity. Deficiency in either the BRCA1 interacting A complex or XRCC4/Ligase 4 confers resistance to Topoisomerase I or PARP1 inhibitors in ATM-deficient cells. This suggests that BRCA1-A directs toxicity to fork-damaging agents in ATM mutated cells vis-a-vis illegitimate end-joining. Here, we show that ATM inhibition triggers combined SUMO and ubiquitin mediated BRCA1-A damaged fork recognition to restrict end-resection and cause Topoisomerase I inhibitor hypersensitivity. BRCA1-A deficient cells display elevated chromatin accessibility and nuclease activity at damaged forks, coupled with restored resection and drug resistance. Electron microscopy evidence demonstrates that ATM inhibition prevents replication fork reversal, which is restored by BRCA1-A loss to generate substrates for end resection. These findings reveal that BRCA1-A enforces a restrictive chromatin state to suppress the genesis of resection substrates, implicating fork reversal as a key determinant of chemotherapy response in ATM deficient cells.

cell biology↗

FET proteins and PARylation-dependent condensates promote replication fork reversal and genome stability

Targeting replication-associated DNA repair mechanisms, including those regulated by PARP1/2 and PARG control of ADP-ribosylation is a powerful cancer therapeutic approach. However, the mechanisms by which PARG inhibition impacts DNA replication remain unclear. Here we combined isolation of proteins on nascent DNA (iPOND) with quantitative proteomics and functional assays to investigate replication fork dynamics upon acute PARG inhibition. We found that FET family proteins (FUS, EWS, and TAF15) are recruited to replication forks in a PAR-dependent manner, forming condensates that slow fork progression and promote fork reversal. FET proteins control fork dynamics in response to some, but not all, replication stresses. FUS inactivation leads to unrestrained fork progression via RECQ1 and PRIMPOL, increased single-stranded DNA gaps, genome instability, and synthetic lethality with BRCA1 deficiency. These findings reveal that FET protein condensates modulate replication stress responses, influencing genome stability and the cellular response to cancer therapeutics targeting PARylation pathways.

molecular biology↗

Condensin and topoisomerases cooperate to relieve topological stress at stalled replication forks

Resolving complex topological structures at replication forks is vital for successful DNA replication, but the mechanisms are little understood. Evidence from diverse eukaryotes suggests that condensin - which promotes chromosome condensation in M phase - might also act during S phase to facilitate relaxation of torsional stress by topoisomerases. Here, we show in yeast and human cells that condensin binds stressed replication forks, where it cooperates with topoisomerases I and II to promote resection of the nascent DNA and restart replication. Our findings suggest that condensin acts with topoisomerase I at reversed forks to convert positively supercoiled DNA into structures that are subsequently relaxed by topoisomerase 2, allowing the fork to resume replication. These findings uncover an important, evolutionarily conserved role for condensin in handling topological constraints at arrested forks that is reminiscent of its function in chromosome segregation and might prevent formation of toxic chromosome structures during fork arrest and reversal.

genetics↗

The SMC5/6 complex is required for maintenance of genome integrity upon APOBEC3A-mediated replication stress

Mutational patterns caused by APOBEC3 cytidine deaminase activity are evident throughout human cancer genomes. In particular, the APOBEC3A family member is a potent genotoxin that causes substantial DNA damage in experimental systems and human tumors. However, the mechanisms that ensure genome stability in cells with active APOBEC3A are unknown. Through an unbiased genome-wide screen, we define the Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes 5/6 (SMC5/6) complex as essential for cell viability when APOBEC3A is active. We observe an absence of APOBEC3A mutagenesis in human tumors with SMC5/6 dysfunction, consistent with synthetic lethality. Cancer cells depleted of SMC5/6 incur substantial genome damage from APOBEC3A activity during DNA replication. Further, APOBEC3A activity results in replication tract lengthening which is dependent on PrimPol, consistent with re-initiation of DNA synthesis downstream of APOBEC3A-induced lesions. Loss of SMC5/6 abrogates elongated replication tracts and increases DNA breaks upon APOBEC3A activity. Our findings indicate that replication fork lengthening reflects a DNA damage response to APOBEC3A activity that promotes genome stability in an SMC5/6-dependent manner. Therefore, SMC5/6 presents a potential therapeutic vulnerability in tumors with active APOBEC3A.

molecular biology↗

DNA Combing versus DNA Spreading and the Separation of Sister Chromatids

DNA combing and DNA spreading are two central approaches for studying DNA replication fork dynamics genome-wide at single-molecule resolution by distributing labeled genomic DNA on coverslips or slides for immunodetection. Perturbations in DNA replication fork dynamics can differentially affect either leading or lagging strand synthesis, for example in instances where replication is blocked by a lesion or obstacle on only one of the two strands. Thus, we sought to investigate whether the DNA combing and/or spreading approaches are suitable for resolving adjacent sister chromatids during DNA replication, thereby enabling the detection of DNA replication dynamics within individual nascent strands. To this end, we developed a thymidine labeling scheme that discriminates between these two possibilities. Our data suggests that DNA combing resolves single chromatids, allowing the detection of strand-specific alterations, whereas DNA spreading does not. These findings have important implications when interpreting DNA replication dynamics from data obtained by these two commonly used techniques.

molecular biology↗

A-type lamins are critical for the recruitment of RPA and RAD51 to stalled replication forks to maintain fork stability

Lamins provide a nuclear scaffold for compartmentalization of genome function that is important for genome integrity. The mechanisms whereby lamins regulate genome stability remain poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate a crucial role for A-type lamins preserving the integrity of the replication fork (RF) during replication stress (RS). We find that lamins bind to nascent DNA strands, especially during RS, and ensure the recruitment of fork protective factors RPA and RAD51. These ssDNA-binding proteins, considered the first and second responders to RS respectively, play crucial roles in the stabilization, remodeling and repair of the stalled fork to ensure proper restart and genome stability. Reduced recruitment of RPA and RAD51 upon lamins depletion elicits replication fork instability (RFI) depicted by MRE11 nuclease-mediated degradation of nascent DNA, RS-induced accumulation of DNA damage, and increased sensitivity to replication inhibitors. Importantly, in contrast to cells deficient in various homology recombination repair proteins, the RFI phenotype of lamins-depleted cells is not linked to RF reversal. This suggests that the point of entry of nucleases is not the reversed fork, but regions of ssDNA generated during RS that are not protected by RPA and RAD51. Consistently, RFI in lamins-depleted cells is rescued by forced elevation of the heterotrimeric RPA complex or RAD51. These data unveil a clear involvement of structural nuclear proteins in the protection of ssDNA from the action of nucleases during RS by warranting proper recruitment of ssDNA binding proteins RPA and RAD51 to stalled RFs. In support of this model, we show physical interaction between RPA and lamins. Our study also suggests that RS is a major source of genomic instability in laminopathies and in lamins-depleted tumors.

cancer biology↗

Replication gaps are a cancer vulnerability counteracted by translesion synthesis

The replication stress response which serves as an anti-cancer barrier is activated not only by DNA damage and replication obstacles, but also oncogenes, mystifying how cancer evolves. Here, we identify that oncogene expression, similar to cancer therapies, induces single stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps that reduce cell fitness, unless suppressed by translesion synthesis (TLS). DNA fiber analysis and electron microscopy reveal that TLS restricts replication fork slowing, reversal, and fork degradation without inducing replication fork gaps. Evidence that TLS gap suppression is fundamental to cancer, a small molecule inhibitor targeting the TLS factor, REV1, not only disrupts DNA replication and cancer cell fitness, but also synergizes with gap-inducing therapies. This work illuminates that gap suppression during replication is critical for cancer cell fitness and therefore a targetable vulnerability.

cancer biology↗