bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Villegas-Rios, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Villegas-Rios, D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Diversity without borders: partitioning continuous spaces using probabilistic equivalent numbers

Equivalent numbers represent biodiversity as the effective number of equally distinct units, typically species, and can be partitioned across scales. In practice, they summarize each unit of biodiversity by a single value and compare units pairwise, misrepresenting units that are better described as distributions and the relationships between several units that share the same space. We introduce an equivalent-number index for assemblages of units represented as probability density functions (PDFs) over a continuous space, estimated as the integral of the pointwise maximum across abundance-weighted PDFs. Resulting equivalent PDF numbers fulfil elementary properties of classical equivalent numbers, and support additive partitioning across any number of nested scales. We illustrate the framework with case studies across three domains: (1) measuring trait diversity considering intraspecific variability in grasslands, (2) partitioning realized bioclimatic niches among clades of Carnivora, and (3) understanding seasonal changes in the partitioning of fish home ranges in geographic space.

ecology↗

Drivers of species knowledge across the Tree of Life

Knowledge of biodiversity is unevenly distributed across the Tree of Life. In the long run, such disparity in awareness unbalances our understanding of life on Earth, influencing policy decisions and the allocation of research and conservation funding. We investigated how humans accumulate knowledge of biodiversity by searching for consistent relationships between scientific (number of publications) and societal (number of views in Wikipedia) interest, and species-level morphological, ecological and socio-cultural factors. Across a random selection of 3,019 species spanning 29 Phyla/Divisions, we show that socio-cultural factors are the most important correlates of scientific and societal interest in biodiversity, including the fact that a species is useful or harmful to humans, has a common name and is listed in the IUCN Red List. Furthermore, large-bodied, broadly distributed and taxonomically unique species receive more scientific and societal attention, whereas colorfulness and phylogenetic proximity to humans correlates exclusively with societal attention. These results highlight a favoritism towards limited branches of the Tree of Life, and that scientific and societal priorities in biodiversity research broadly align. This suggests that we may be missing out on key species in our research and conservation agenda simply because they are not on our cultural radar.

ecology↗