Biology subjects

Verbist, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Verbist, B..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Assessing differential cell composition in single-cell studies using voomCLR

In single-cell studies, a common question is whether there is a change in cell composition between conditions. While ideally, one needs absolute cell counts (number of cells per volumetric unit in a sample) to address these questions, current experimentation typically obtains cell counts that only carry relative information. It is therefore crucial to account for the compositional nature of cell count data in the statistical analysis. While recently developed methods address compositionality using compositional transformations together with a bias correction, they do not account for the uncertainty involved in estimation of the bias term, nor do they accommodate the mean-variance structure of the counts. Here, we introduce a statistical method, voomCLR, for assessing differences in cell composition between conditions incorporating both uncertainty on the bias term as well as acknowledging the mean-variance structure of the transformed data, by leveraging developments from the differential gene expression literature. We demonstrate the performances of voomCLR, illustrate the benefit of all components and compare the methodology to the state-of-the-art on simulated and real single-cell gene expression datasets.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2024

Strategies for addressing pseudoreplication in multi-patient scRNA-seq data

The rapidly evolving field of single-cell transcriptomics has provided a powerful means for understanding cellular heterogeneity. Large-scale studies with multiple biological samples hold promise for discovering differentially expressed biomarkers with a higher level of confidence through a better characterization of the target population. However, the hierarchical nature of these experiments introduces a significant challenge for downstream statistical analysis. Indeed, despite the availability of numerous differential expression methods, only a select few can accurately address the within-patient correlation of single-cell expression profiles. Furthermore, due to the high computational costs associated with some of these methods, their practical use is limited. In this manuscript, we undertake a comprehensive assessment of different strategies to address the hierarchical correlation structure in multi-sample scRNA-seq data. We employ synthetic data generated from a simulator that retains the original correlation structure of multi-patient data while making minimal assumptions, providing a robust platform for benchmarking method performance. Our analyses indicate that neglecting within-patient correlation jeopardizes type I error control. We show that, in line with some previous reports and in contrast with others, Poisson Generalized Estimation Equations provide a useful and flexible framework for addressing these issues. We also show that pseudobulk approaches outperform single-cell level methods across the board. In this work, we resolve the conflicting results regarding the utility of GEEs and their performance relative to pseudobulk approaches. As such, we provide valuable guidelines for researchers navigating the complex landscape of gene expression modeling, and offer insights on choosing the most appropriate methods based on the specific structure and design of their datasets.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2023

Differential detection workflows for multi-sample single-cell RNA-seq data

In single-cell transcriptomics, differential gene expression (DE) analyses typically focus on testing differences in the average expression of genes between cell types or conditions of interest. Single-cell transcriptomics, however, also has the promise to prioritise genes for which the expression differ in other aspects of the distribution. Here we develop a workflow for assessing differential detection (DD), which tests for differences in the average fraction of samples or cells in which a gene is detected. After benchmarking eight different DD data analysis strategies, we provide a unified workflow for jointly assessing DE and DD. Using simulations and two case studies, we show that DE and DD analysis provide complementary information, both in terms of the individual genes they report and in the functional interpretation of those genes.

bioinformatics↗