bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Veitz, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Veitz, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Changing color and intensity of LED lighting across the day impacts on human circadian physiology, sleep, visual comfort and cognitive performance

We examined whether dynamic light across a scheduled 16-h waking day influences cognitive performance, visual comfort, melatonin secretion, sleepiness and sleep under strictly controlled laboratory conditions of 49-h duration. Participants spent the first 5-h in the evening under standard lighting, followed by an 8-h nocturnal sleep episode at habitual bedtimes. Thereafter volunteers either woke up with static daylight LED (100 lux and 4000 Kelvin) or with a dynamic daylight LED that changed color (2700 - 5000 Kelvin) and intensity (0 - 100 lux) across the scheduled 16-h waking day. This was followed by an 8-h nocturnal treatment sleep episode at habitual bedtimes. Thereafter, volunteers spent another 12-h either under static or dynamic light during scheduled wakefulness. Under dynamic light, evening melatonin levels were less suppressed 1.5hours prior to usual bedtime, and participants felt less vigilant in the evening compared to static light. Sleep latency was significantly shorter in both the baseline and treatment night compared to the static light condition while sleep structure, sleep quality, cognitive performance and visual comfort did not significantly change. Our results support the recommendation of using blue-depleted light and low illuminances in the late evening, which can be achieved by a dynamically changing daylight LED solution.

physiology↗

Wide awake at bedtime? The effects of caffeine on sleep and circadian timing in teenagers - a randomized crossover trial

BackgroundAdolescents frequently consume caffeine with unknown consequences on sleep and circadian rhythms. In adults, the evidence indicates that caffeine acutely reduces homeostatic sleep pressure and delays the circadian timing system. ObjectiveHere, we investigated the acute effects of caffeine intake on the developing sleep-wake regulatory system of teenagers. DesignIn a double-blind randomized crossover laboratory study, 18 teenagers (16.1 {+/-} 1 years old, pubertal development scale [PDS]: 2.76 {+/-} 0.35) ingested 80 mg caffeine (vs placebo) four hours prior to bedtime. Until bedtime, participants regularly filled in the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale and gave saliva samples to measure melatonin secretion. During nighttime, we quantified homeostatic sleep need by the electroencephalographically derived amount of slow wave sleep duration (SWS). After sleep, participants rated sleep quality by the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire. ResultsWhile participants felt less sleepy after caffeine vs. placebo (P=0.038), their ratings of sleep quality were not strongly affected by the treatment. However, objectively, SWS was on average reduced by [~]20 min after caffeine vs. placebo (P=0.026). This caffeine-induced reduction was more pronounced in those individuals with more SWS under placebo (regression: P=0.042; standardized beta=0.622, P=0.011), even if controlling for habitual caffeine intake or pubertal stage (PDS). In melatonin onsets we observed both delays and advances in response to caffeine. This variance could partly be explained by differences in relative dose (i.e., mg caffeine/kg of bodyweight): the higher the relative dose, the more likely were delays (regression: P=0.01; standardized beta=0.592, P=0.01). ConclusionsIn teenagers, evening caffeine intake of already 80 mg (i.e. [~]8fl oz of common energy drinks) is sufficient to promote alertness at the costs of subsequent sleep. These costs might be more pronounced in adolescents with a higher need for SWS. Moreover, caffeine might disturb the circadian timing system, consequently hampering the balanced interplay of sleep-wake regulatory components. Sources of SupportMarie-Heim-Voegtlin Grant of the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) PMPDP1_171364

neuroscience↗