Biology subjects

Vangone, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Vangone, A..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

MIMOSA: Guiding De Novo Antibody Design with Natural Interaction Fingerprints

De novo antibody design promises to transform therapeutic antibody and nanobody discovery. Yet, success remains inconsistent across targets, with generative models often yielding no experimentally validated binders. Here we introduce MIMOSA (MIMic-Oriented Structural Antibody generation), a model-agnostic, inference-time framework that constrains diffusion-based antibody design pipelines to reproduce the interaction geometry and chemistry of a target's known cognate binder interface. Rather than searching for a productive interface from scratch, MIMOSA constrains generation around residue identities and geometries already known to support binding, while allowing the generative model to complete the surrounding antibody interface. We test MIMOSA on different interface topologies: contiguous motifs that fit within a single CDR loop and spatially dispersed hotspots distributed across the paratope. Applied without retraining to two architecturally distinct generators (RFAntibody and BoltzGen), this framework delivers experimentally validated binders-achieving sub-micromolar to single-digit nanomolar affinities-at 20-26% hit rates on three targets on which unconstrained methods produce zero or near-zero binders: KEAP1, uPA, and IL-8. By turning any target with a structurally characterised cognate binder into an accessible de novo design problem, this framework broadens the practical reach of generative antibody design to targets where unconstrained approaches currently fail.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2021

A Random Forest Classifier for Protein-Protein Docking Models

Herein, we present the results of a machine learning approach we developed to single out correct 3D docking models of protein-protein complexes obtained by popular docking software. To this aim, we generated a set of {approx}7x106 docking models with three different docking programs (HADDOCK, FTDock and ZDOCK) for the 230 complexes in the protein-protein interaction benchmark, version 5 (BM5). Three different machine-learning approaches (Random Forest, Supported Vector Machine and Perceptron) were used to train classifiers with 158 different scoring functions (features). The Random Forest algorithm outperformed the other two algorithms and was selected for further optimization. Using a features selection algorithm, and optimizing the random forest hyperparameters, allowed us to train and validate a random forest classifier, named CoDES (COnservation Driven Expert System). Testing of CoDES on independent datasets, as well as results of its comparative performance with machine-learning methods recently developed in the field for the scoring of docking decoys, confirm its state-of-the-art ability to discriminate correct from incorrect decoys both in terms of global parameters and in terms of decoys ranked at the top positions.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2020

Co-evolutionary Distance Prediction for Flexibility Prediction

Co-evolution analysis can be used to accurately predict residue-residue contacts from multiple sequence alignments. The introduction of machine-learning techniques has enabled substantial improvements in precision and a shift from predicting binary contacts to predicting distances between pairs of residues. These developments have significantly improved the accuracy of de novo prediction of static protein structures. Here we examine the potential of these residue-residue distance predictions to predict protein flexibility rather than static structure. We used DMPfold to predict distance distributions for every residue pair in a set of proteins that showed both rigid and flexible behaviour. Residue pairs that were in contact in at least one reference structure were considered and classified as rigid, flexible or neither. The predicted distance distribution of each residue pair was analysed for local maxima of probability indicating the most likely distance or distances between a pair of residues. The average number of local maxima per residue pair was found to be different between the sets of rigid and flexible residue pairs. Flexible residue pairs more often had multiple local maxima in their predicted distance distribution than rigid residue pairs suggesting that the shape of predicted distance distributions is predictive of rigidity or flexibility of residue pairs.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2019

An overview of data-driven HADDOCK strategies in CAPRI rounds 38-45.

Our information-driven docking approach HADDOCK has demonstrated a sustained performance since the start of its participation to CAPRI. This is due, in part, to its ability to integrate data into the modelling process, and to the robustness of its scoring function. We participated in CAPRI both as server and as manual predictors.\n\nIn CAPRI rounds 38-45, we have used various strategies depending on the information at hand. These ranged from imposing restraints to a few residues identified from literature as being important for the interaction, to binding pockets identified from homologous complexes or template-based refinement / CA-CA restraint-guided docking from identified templates. When relevant, symmetry restraints were used to limit the conformational sampling. We also tested for a large decamer target a new implementation of the MARTINI coarse-grained force field in HADDOCK. Overall in the current rounds, we obtained acceptable or better predictions for 13 and 11 server and manual submissions, respectively, out of the 22 interfaces. Our server performance (acceptable models) was better (59%) than the manual (50%) one, in which we typically experiment with various combinations of protocols and data sources. Again, our simple scoring function based on a linear combination of intermolecular van der Waals and electrostatic energies and an empirical desolvation term demonstrated a good performance in the scoring experiment with a 63% success rate across all 22 interfaces.\n\nAn analysis of model quality indicates that, while we are consistently performing well in generating acceptable models, there is room for improvement for generating/identifying higher quality models.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

iSEE: Interface Structure, Evolution and Energy-based machine learning predictor of binding affinity changes upon mutations

Quantitative evaluation of binding affinity changes upon mutations is crucial for protein engineering and drug design. Machine learning-based methods are gaining increasing momentum in this field. Due to the limited number of experimental data, using a small number of sensitive predictive features is vital to the generalization and robustness of such machine learning methods. Here we introduce a fast and reliable predictor of binding affinity changes upon single point mutation, based on a random forest approach. Our method, iSEE, uses a limited number of interface Structure, Evolution and Energy-based features for the prediction. iSEE achieves, using only 31 features, a high prediction performance with a Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) of 0.80 and a root mean square error of 1.41 kcal mol-1 on a diverse training dataset consisting of 1102 mutations in 57 protein-protein complexes. It competes with existing state-of-the-art methods on two blind test datasets. Predictions for a new dataset of 540 mutations in 58 protein complexes from the recently published SKEMPI 2.0 database reveals that none of the current methods perform well (PCC<0.4), although their combination does improve the predictions. Feature analysis for iSEE underlines the significance of evolutionary conservations for quantitative prediction of mutation effects.

bioinformatics↗