bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

VanKuren, N. W.

Publications and source records attributed to VanKuren, N. W..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Evolution of compound eye cell types shapes visual behaviors across Heliconius butterflies

The evolution of visual systems is tightly linked to the diversification of visually guided behaviors. Using Heliconius butterflies, renowned for their rapid diversification of wing color patterns and corresponding visual mate preferences, we investigate the evolution of compound eye cell types across a complete speciation continuum. By integrating population genomics, chromatin conformation capture, and single-nucleus multi-omics, we uncover multi-modal mechanisms driving visual system evolution. Within a population polymorphic for mate preference, we identify senseless-2 as a glia-expressing candidate visual preference gene. Across species, we reveal that photoreceptors, particularly the color-sensing R7s, are the fastest-evolving cell types. Furthermore, we molecularly characterize novel R2/5 and R7 photoreceptor subtypes, showing that cellular subfunctionalization arises through the co-option of existing gene regulatory networks. Together, this comparative single-cell analysis of compound eyes bridges microevolutionary transcriptomic divergence with macroevolutionary cellular innovations.

evolutionary biology↗

A shared gene but distinct dynamics regulate mimicry polymorphisms in closely related species

Sex-limited polymorphisms, such as mating strategies in male birds and mimicry in female butterflies, are widespread across the tree of life and are frequently adaptive. Considerable work has been done exploring the ecological pressures and evolutionary forces that generate and maintain genetic variation resulting in alternative sex-limited morphs, yet little is known about their molecular and developmental genetic basis. A powerful system to investigate this is Papilio butterflies: within the subgenus Menelaides, multiple closely related species have female-limited mimicry polymorphism, with females developing either derived mimetic or ancestral non-mimetic wing color patterns. While mimetic color patterns are different between species, each polymorphism is controlled by allelic variation of doublesex (dsx). Across several species, we found that the mimetic and non-mimetic females develop male-like color patterns when we knockdown dsx expression, establishing that dsx controls both sexual dimorphism and polymorphism. We also found that mimetic dsx alleles have unique spatiotemporal expression patterns between two species, Papilio lowii and Papilio alphenor. To uncover the downstream genes involved in the color pattern switch between both species, we used RNA-seq in P. lowii and compared the results to previous work in P. alphenor. While some canonical wing patterning genes are differentially expressed in females of both species, the temporal patterns of differential expression are notably different. Our results indicate that, despite the putative ancestral co-option and shared use of dsx among closely related species, the mimicry switch functions through distinct underlying mechanisms. AUTHOR SUMMARYUnderstanding how a largely shared genome can encode the potential to develop multiple morphs while simultaneously restricting this potential to one sex has long been of interest to evolutionary and developmental biologists. This phenomenon, called sex-limited polymorphism, is widespread, occurring in organisms like crustaceans, insects, fish, birds, and mammals. Recent empirical work has begun to identify the genes controlling the switch between phenotypes, but the differences between developmental programs leading to those phenotypes remain unclear. Here we use a classic example of sex-limited polymorphism - female mimicry in swallowtail butterflies - to compare how closely related species have evolved to use the same gene, doublesex, in the development of multiple female morphs. Using a combination of functional experiments, we show that despite the shared use of doublesex, the developmental genetics underlying sex-limited polymorphism have evolved to function quite differently between two species that last shared a common ancestor approximately 15 million years ago.

evolutionary biology↗

Supergene evolution via gain of auto-regulation

Development requires the coordinated action of many genes across space and time, yet numerous species have evolved the ability to develop multiple discrete, alternate phenotypes1-5. Such polymorphisms are often controlled by supergenes, sets of tightly-linked loci that function together to control development of a polymorphic phenotype6-10. Although theories of supergene evolution are well-established, the mutations that cause functional differences between supergene alleles have been difficult to identify. The doublesex gene is a master regulator of insect sexual differentiation but has been co-opted to function as a supergene in multiple Papilio swallowtail butterflies, where divergent dsx alleles control development of discrete non-mimetic or mimetic female wing shapes and color patterns11-15. Here we demonstrate that the Papilio alphenor supergene evolved via recruitment of six new cis-regulatory elements (CREs) that control allele-specific dsx expression. Most dsx CREs, including four of the six new CREs, are bound by the DSX transcription factor itself. Our findings provide experimental support to classic supergene theory and suggest that autoregulation may provide a simple route to supergene origination and to the co-option of pleiotropic genes into new developmental roles.

evolutionary biology↗

Divergent expression of aristaless1 and aristaless2 is associated with embryonic appendage and pupal wing development in butterflies

Aristaless is a major regulator of developmental processes. It is well known for its role during appendage specification and extension across animals. Butterflies and moths have two copies of aristaless, aristaless1 (al1) and aristaless2 (al2), as a result of a gene duplication event. Previous work in Heliconius has shown that both copies appear to have novel functions related to wing color patterning. Here we expand our knowledge on the expression profiles associated with both ancestral and novel functions of Al1 across embryogenesis and wing pigmentation. Furthermore, we characterize Al2 expression, providing a comparative framework for understanding the role of gene duplicates in novel and ancestral roles. Our work shows that both Al1 and Al2 expression are associated with developing sensory appendages (leg, mouth, spines, and eyes) in embryos. Interestingly, Al1 appears to show higher expression earlier in embryogenesis while the highest levels of Al2 expression are shifted to later stages of embryonic development. Furthermore, Al1 localization appears extranuclear while Al2 co-localizes tightly with nuclei earlier, and then also expands outside the nucleus later in development. We observed similar cellular expression patterns for Al1 and Al2 in pupal wings when examining their roles in pigmentation. We also describe, for the first time, how Al1 localization appear to correlates with zones of Anterior/Posterior elongation of the body during embryonic growth, showcasing a possible new function related to Aristaless previously described role in appendage extension. Overall, these data suggest similar developmental roles associated with the extension/formation of specific appendages for both duplicates. However, we describe that such functions might be regulated by spatially and temporally complex patterns of expression for al1 and al2. This work expands our knowledge of Aristaless function and expression following gene duplication and the implications of the duplication on butterfly development. Finally, and more fundamentally, our study helps clarify principles behind sub-functionalization and gene expression evolution associated with developmental functions following gene duplication events.

developmental biology↗

Genetic and peripheral visual system changes underlie evolving butterfly mate preference

Many studies have linked genetic variation to behavior, but less is known about how that variation alters the neural circuits that drive behavior. We investigated the genetic and neurobiological basis of courtship preference variation in Heliconius butterflies, which use vision to identify appropriate mates based on wing color patterns. We found that Heliconius cydno preference variation was strongly associated with genetic variation and differential expression of senseless-2, a gene predominantly expressed in the eye. Further measurements of photoreceptor sensitivities revealed differences in inter-photoreceptor inhibition of ultraviolet-sensitive cells corresponding to courtship preference variation. Our results reveal a genetic basis for preference/cue co-evolution, suggest a link between sens-2 and visual system variation, and support the idea that changing peripheral neural computations can significantly alter essential behaviors. SummaryGenetic and expression variation of senseless-2 and inter-photoreceptor inhibition predict visual mate preference in a clade of diverse butterflies.

evolutionary biology↗

Sex-limited diversification of the eye in Heliconius butterflies

Butterflies have evolved an immense diversity in eye organization to support a range of vision-based behaviors including courtship, oviposition, and foraging. This diversity has been surveyed extensively across the butterfly phylogeny, and here we take a complementary approach to characterize the eye within a group of closely related Heliconius butterflies. Using a combination of immunostaining for different opsins and eyeshine for determining the distribution of light-filtering screening pigments, we identified several sexually dimorphic features of eye organization where male eyes varied and female eyes did not. Ultraviolet (UV) sensitive photoreceptors varied in which of two UV opsins were expressed, including co-expression of both within single photoreceptors, and these differences were consistent with a role in courtship and conspecific identification. Additional differences across species and sex included the distribution of three ommatidial types defined by the expression pattern of UV and blue opsins, the distribution of a red screening pigment, and which ommatidial types expressed the red screening pigment. We hypothesize that female eyes are optimized for a dimorphic behavior such as oviposition, while male eyes adapt to other selective pressures such as the local light environment.

neuroscience↗

New Genes in Drosophila Quickly Evolved Essential Functions in Viability During Development

It is a conventionally held dogma that the genetic basis underlying development is conserved in a long evolutionary time scale. Ample experiments based on mutational, biochemical, functional, and complementary knockdown/knockout approaches have revealed the unexpectedly important role of recently evolved new genes in the development of Drosophila. The recent progress in the analyses of gene effects and improvements in the computational identification of new genes, which has led to large sample sizes of new genes, open the door to investigate the evolution of gene essentiality with a phylogenetically high resolution. These advancements also raised interesting issues related to phenotypic effect analyses of genes, particularly of those that recently originated. Here we reported our analyses of these issues, including the dating of gene ages, the interpretation of RNAi data that may confuse false positive/false negative rates, and the potential confounding impact of compensation and developmental effects that were not considered during previous CRISPR knockout experiments. We further analyzed new data from knockdowns of 702 new genes (~66% of total 1,070 Drosophila melanogaster new genes), revealing a similarly high proportion of essential genes from recent evolution, compared to those found in distant ancestors of D. melanogaster. Knockout of a few young genes detected analogous essentiality. Furthermore, our experimentally determined distribution and comparison of knockdown efficiency in different RNAi libraries provided valuable data for general functional analyses of genes. Taken together, these data, along with an improved understanding of the phenotypic effect analyses of new genes, provide further evidence to the conclusion that new genes in Drosophila quickly evolved essential functions in viability during development.

developmental biology↗