Vaidziulyte, K. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2021

Coupling between protrusion dynamics and polarized trafficking steers persistent cell migration

Migrating cells present a variety of paths, from random to highly directional ones. While random movement can be explained by basal intrinsic activity, persistent movement requires stable polarization. Here, we quantitatively address emergence of persistent migration in RPE1 cells over long timescales. By live-cell imaging and dynamic micropatterning, we demonstrate that the Nucleus-Golgi axis aligns with direction of migration leading to efficient cell movement. We show that polarized trafficking is directed towards protrusions with a 20 min delay, and that migration becomes random after disrupting internal cell organization. Eventually, we prove that localized optogenetic Cdc42 activation orients the Nucleus-Golgi axis. Our work suggests that polarized trafficking stabilizes the protrusive activity of the cell, while protrusive activity orients this polarity axis, leading to persistent cell migration. Using a minimal physical model, we show that this feedback is sufficient to recapitulate the quantitative properties of cell migration in the timescale of hours.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2018

Optogenetic dissection of Rac1 and Cdc42 gradient shaping

During migration, cells present a polarized activity that is aligned with the direction of motion. This cell polarity is established by an internal molecular circuitry, without the requirement of extracellular cues. At the heart of this circuitry, Rho GTPases spontaneously form spatial gradients that define the front and back of migrating cells. At the front of the cell, active Cdc42 forms a steep gradient whereas active Rac1 forms a more extended pattern peaking a few microns away from the cell tip. What are the mechanisms shaping these gradients, and what is the functional role of the shape of these gradients? Combining optogenetics and cell micopatterning, we show that Cdc42 and Rac1 gradients are set by spatial patterns of activators and deactivators and not directly by advection or diffusion mechanisms. Cdc42 simply follows the distribution of GEFs thanks to a uniform GAP activity, whereas Rac1 shaping requires the activity of an additional GAP, {beta}2-chimaerin, which is sharply localized at the tip of the cell. We find that {beta}2-chimaerin recruitment depends on feedbacks from Cdc42 and Rac1. Functionally, the extent -neither the slope nor the amplitude- of RhoGTPases gradients governs cell migration. A Cdc42 gradient with a short spatial extent is required to maximize directionality during cell migration while an extended Rac1 gradient controls the speed of the cell.

cell biology↗