Biology subjects

Unni, A. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Unni, A. M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

MEK inhibitor resistance in lung cancer cells associated with addiction to sustained ERK suppression

MEK inhibitors have yielded limited efficacy in KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients due to drug resistance. We established trametinib-resistant KRAS-mutant LUAD cells and describe a state of "drug addiction" in a subset of resistant cases where cells are dependent on trametinib for survival. Dependence on ERK2 suppression underlies this phenomenon whereby trametinib removal hyperactivates ERK and results in ER stress and apoptosis. Amplification of KRASG12C occurs in drug-addicted cells and blocking mutant specific activity with AMG 510 rescues the lethality after trametinib withdrawal. Furthermore, increased KRASG12C expression is lethal to other KRAS mutant LUAD cells, consequential to ERK hyperactivation. Our study represents the first instance of this phenotype associated with KRAS amplification and demonstrates that acquired genetic changes that develop in the background of MAPK suppression can have unique consequence. We suggest that the presence of mutant KRAS amplification in patients may identify those that may benefit from a "drug holiday" to circumvent drug resistance. These findings demonstrate the toxic potential of hyperactive ERK signaling and highlight potential therapeutic opportunities in patients bearing KRAS mutations.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Hyperactivation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) by RAS-mediated signaling or inhibition of dual specificity phosphatase 6 (DUSP6) is associated with toxicity in lung adenocarcinoma cells with mutations in KRAS or EGFR

We recently described the synthetic lethality that results when mutant KRAS and mutant EGFR are coexpressed in human lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) cells, revealing the biological basis for the mutual exclusivity of KRAS and EGFR mutations in lung cancers. We have now further defined the biochemical events responsible for the toxic effects of signaling through the RAS pathway. By combining pharmacological and genetic approaches, we have developed multiple lines of evidence that signaling through extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2) mediates the toxicity. These findings imply that tumors with mutant oncogenes that drive signaling through the RAS pathway must restrain the activity of ERK1/2 to avoid cell toxicities and enable tumor growth. In particular, a dual specificity phosphatase, DUSP6, regulates phosphorylated (P)-ERK levels in lung adenocarcinoma cells, providing negative feedback to the RAS signaling pathway. Accordingly, inhibition of DUSP6 is cytotoxic in LUAD cells driven by either mutant KRAS or mutant EGFR, phenocopying the effects of co-expression of mutant KRAS and EGFR. Together, these data suggest that targeting DUSP6 or other feedback regulators of the EGFR-KRAS-ERK pathway may offer a strategy for treating certain cancers by exceeding an upper threshold of RAS-mediated signaling.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2016

How Cancer Genomics Drives Cancer Biology: Does Synthetic Lethality Explain Mutually Exclusive Oncogenic Mutations?

Large-scale analyses of cancer genomes are revealing patterns of mutations that suggest biologically significant ideas about many aspects of cancer, including carcinogenesis, classification, and preventive and therapeutic strategies. Among those patterns is \"mutual exclusivity\", a phenomenon observed when two or more mutations that are commonly observed in samples of a type of cancer are not found combined in individual tumors. We have been studying a striking example of mutual exclusivity: the absence of co-existing mutations in the KRAS and EGFR proto-oncogenes in human lung adenocarcinomas, despite the high individual frequencies of such mutations in this common type of cancer. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that toxic effects of the joint expression of KRAS and EGFR mutant oncogenes, rather than loss of any selective advantages conferred by a second oncogene that operates through the same signaling pathway, are responsible for the observed mutational pattern. We discuss the potential for understanding the physiological basis of such toxicity, for exploiting it therapeutically, and for extending the studies to other examples of mutual exclusivity.

cancer biology↗