Biology subjects

Uhm, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Uhm, H..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Site-specific replacement of large-scale DNA fragments in human cells

Despite advances in genome editing1-4, precisely replacing large-scale fragments in human cells remains a significant challenge. Here, we present a site-specific gene replacement tool, named Prime Assembly (PA), which adapts prime editors to produce one or two pairs of 3-flaps on both the genome and donor plasmids. These 3-flaps anneal to each other precisely, similar to "Gibson Assembly" in DNA oligonucleotides5, allowing megabase-scale genomic excision and/or kilobase-scale donor insertion at the gene of interest. The PA system achieves an efficiency of up to 57.8% in replacing endogenous sequences with a 2.9 kbp donor DNA fragment in HEK293T cells, and presents an accuracy of more than 99% for integrated PA fragments. Ultimately, the site-specific replacement of large-scale coding sequences (CDSs) in disease-related genes can restore gene function across numerous patients with different mutations, providing a gene implantation technique for genome editing and a universal therapeutic approach.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2025

Engineered ADARs enable single-nucleotide resolution DNA A-to-G editing without bystander effects

The adenine base editor (ABE), which enables A*T-to-G*C base conversion, has emerged as a powerful tool for therapeutic applications. However, conventional ABEs suffer from bystander nucleotide conversions, limiting their utility for precise editing. Here, we present a single-nucleotide resolution ABE (snuABE) created by fusing a nickase Cas9, nCas9(H840A), with the deaminase domain of ADAR, which acts on DNA:RNA hybrids, instead of TadA, which acts on single-stranded DNA in conventional ABEs. snuABE requires a specially designed target-adenine guide RNA (tagRNA) that introduces a mismatch at the target adenine, enabling highly specific A-to-G editing by ADAR. Engineering ADAR from Pediculus humanus using the in silico protein evolution algorithm EvolvePro, along with 3-end protection of the tagRNA, further enhances the editing activity of snuABE in human cells. Moreover, snuABE exhibits significantly reduced DNA off-target activity, highlighting its potential as a safer and more precise base editing technology for therapeutic applications.

bioengineering↗

bioRxiv2024

AI-generated small binder improves prime editing

The prime editing 2 (PE2) system comprises a nickase Cas9 fused to a reverse transcriptase utilizing a prime editing guide RNA (pegRNA) to introduce desired mutations at target genomic sites. However, the PE efficiency is limited by mismatch repair (MMR) that excises the DNA strand containing desired edits. Thus, inhibiting key components of MMR complex through transient expression of a dominant negative MLH1 (MLH1dn) exhibited approximately 7.7-fold increase in PE efficiency over PE2, generating PE4. Herein, by utilizing a generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, RFdiffusion and AlphaFold 3, we ultimately generated a de novo MLH1 small binder (named MLH1-SB), which bind to the dimeric interface of MLH1 and PMS2 to disrupt the formation of key MMR components. MLH1-SBs small size (82 amino acids) allowed it to be integrated into pre-existing PE architectures via the 2A system, creating a novel PE-SB platform. Resultantly, by incorporating MLH1-SB into PE7, we have developed an improved PE architecture called PE7-SB, which demonstrates the highest PE efficiency to date (29.4-fold over PE2 and 2.4-fold over PE7 in HeLa cells), providing an insight that generative AI technologies will boost up the improvement of genome editing tools.

bioengineering↗

bioRxiv2020

RNA polymerase clamp conformational dynamics: long-lived states and modulation by crowding, cations, and nonspecific DNA binding

The RNA polymerase (RNAP) clamp, a mobile structural element conserved in RNAP from all domains of life, has been proposed to play critical roles at different stages of transcription. In previous work, we demonstrated using single-molecule Forster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) that RNAP clamp interconvert between three short-lived conformational states (lifetimes [~] 0.3-0.6 s), that the clamp can be locked into any one of these states by small molecules, and that the clamp stays closed during initial transcription and elongation. Here, we extend these studies to obtain a comprehensive understanding of clamp dynamics under conditions RNAP may encounter in living cells. We find that the RNAP clamp can populate long-lived conformational states (lifetimes >1.0 s) and can switch between these long-lived states and the previously observed short-lived states. In addition, we find that clamp motions are increased in the presence of molecular crowding, are unchanged in the presence of elevated monovalent-cation concentrations, and are reduced in the presence of elevated divalent-cation concentrations. Finally, we find that RNAP bound to non-specific DNA predominantly exhibits a closed clamp conformation. Our results raise the possibility of additional regulatory checkpoints that could affect clamp dynamics and consequently could affect transcription and transcriptional regulation.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2019

Transcription reinitiation by recycling RNA polymerase that diffuses on DNA after releasing terminated RNA

(Abstract)Despite extensive studies on transcription mechanisms, it is unknown how termination complexes are disassembled, especially in what order the components dissociate. Our single-molecule fluorescence study unveils that RNA transcript release precedes RNA polymerase (RNAP) dissociation from DNA template in bacterial intrinsic termination of transcription much more often than concurrent dissociation. As termination is defined by release of product RNA from transcription complex, the subsequent retention of RNAP on DNA constitutes a previously unidentified stage, termed here as recycling. During the recycling stage, RNAPs one-dimensionally diffuse on DNA in downward and upward directions, and these RNAPs can initiate transcription again at nearby promoters in case of retaining a sigma factor. The efficiency of this event, termed here as reinitiation, increases with supplement of a sigma factor. In summary, after releasing RNA product at intrinsic termination, recycling RNAP diffuses on DNA template for reinitiation most times.

biophysics↗