bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Uesugi, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Uesugi, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Meta-analysis reveals the tempo of evolutionary parallelism of local adaptation between native and introduced ranges of plant species

Invasive species are valuable systems for evaluating evolutionary predictability, as populations in native and introduced ranges evolve separately, yet often encounter similar environmental challenges that select for parallel patterns of local adaptation across each range. However, it remains unclear how pervasive and strong such parallelism is and how rapidly it evolves. To address these questions, we first extended cline theory to predict evolutionary patterns of trait cline parallelism between ranges. We then carried out a meta-analysis of clinal divergence in native and introduced populations of the same plant species and evaluated the tempo of trait cline parallelism between ranges. We found that clines in introduced ranges were somewhat shallower than native range clines, and directions of clinal divergence were, on average, partially aligned between ranges, with extensive variation in parallelism among traits and species, including counter-clines between native and introduced ranges. The degree of evolutionary parallelism of clinal divergence strongly increased, and the prevalence of counter-clines decreased, with the time since introduction, where greater parallelism in older introductions was primarily caused by increased alignment in the direction of clinal divergence between ranges rather than changes in their relative magnitudes of divergence. We argue that these observations are consistent with a two-phased process of cline evolution across introduced ranges. In the first phase, misaligned clines between introduced and native ranges can arise during range expansions, often owing to demographic and genetic constraints that initially hinder the evolution of local adaptation within the new range. During the second phase, the evolution of local adaptation eventually resolves early instances of maladaptation across introduced ranges, leading to strong trait cline parallelism between native and introduced ranges.

evolutionary biology↗

EICA Fails As An Explanation Of Growth And Defence Evolution Following Multiple Introductions

O_LIRapid adaptation can aid invasive populations in their competitive success. Resource-allocation trade-off hypotheses predict higher resource availability or the lack of natural enemies in introduced ranges allow for increased growth and reproduction, thus contributing to invasive success. Evidence for such hypotheses are however equivocal and tests among multiple ranges over productivity gradients are required to provide a better understanding of the general applicability of these theories.\nC_LIO_LIUsing common gardens, we investigated the adaptive divergence of various constitutive and inducible defence-related traits between the native North American and introduced European and Australian ranges, whilst controlling for divergence due to latitudinal trait clines, individual resource budgets and population differentiation, using >11,000 SNPs.\nC_LIO_LIRapid, repeated clinal adaptation in defence-related traits was apparent despite distinct demographic histories. We also identified divergence among ranges in some defence-related traits, although differences in energy budgets among ranges may explain some, but not all, defence-related trait divergence. We do not identify a general reduction in defence in concert with an increase in growth among the multiple introduced ranges as predicted trade-off hypotheses.\nC_LIO_LISynthesis: The rapid spread of invasive species is affected by a multitude of factors, likely including adaptation to climate and escape from natural enemies. Unravelling the mechanisms underlying invasives success enhances understanding of eco-evolutionary theory and is essential to inform management strategies in the face of ongoing climate change.\nC_LI

evolutionary biology↗