bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Udema, I.

Publications and source records attributed to Udema, I..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Higher Precision in Initial rates may be achievable: A test of a Pseudo-statistical method

BackgroundThere has been a concerted effort at establishing the best method for the measurement of initial rates for various purposes, including the calculation of kinetic parameters, the maximum velocity (Vmax), and the Michaelis-Menten constant (KM). ObjectivesThe objectives of this research are: 1) to derive equations without KM for the determination of the Vmax in particular and vice versa; 2) to determine the KM and Vmax with other equations other than the Michaelian equation; and 3) to subject the calculated and extrapolated kinetic parameters to pseudo- statistical remediation where necessary as a test of their viability and usefulness. MethodsThe study was experimental and theoretical. It is supported by the Bernfeld method of enzyme assay. ResultBy graphical means, the Vmax and KM values for galactosidase respectively range between 163 and 185 M/min and between 2.07 and 2.77 mg/L; the range by calculations is 177 and 214 M/min and 2.45 and 3.311 mg/L, subject to pseudo-statistical remediation. Overall, the ranges of Vmax and KM values for alpha-amylase from both the graphical method and calculation are, respectively, 1.095 to 1.018 mM/min and 18.15 to 20.554 g/L. ConclusionThe equations for the determination of the KM and Vmax, which are respectively invariant with respect to each other, were rederived. The initial rates must not be a mixture of both if the true KM and Vmax are of interest. The new pseudo-statistical method for the remediation of error in all measurements, if necessary, is viable, useful, and robust. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=82 SRC="FIGDIR/small/537023v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (22K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@824dfaorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cd95e5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12c0771org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19cb86d_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOA:C_FLOATNO Plots where conditions that validate a very high incidence of rQSSA are the case: [ET] is >>[ST]. Plot of v1 to v5 versus [ST]1 to [ST]5 gave equation of linear regression (double reciprocal plot (drp)) such as: y = (0.08x - 0.0002) exp. (+3). A drp plot of all values of v versus all values of [ST] gave a linear regression equation such as: y = (0.08 x + 6 exp. (- 05)) exp. (+3). [Figure 1] stands for a linear regression of v versus [ST] (y = 0.0125x); [Figure 1] stands for a linear regression of 1/v versus 1/[ST]. [ST]nvn-1 - [ST]n-1vn is = zero in all data points. The reciprocal of the intercept gives a very high value (over estimation of the maximum velocity, Vmax (16667 mM/min) and consequently an over estimated Michaelis-Menten constant, KM (KM value is = 106.668 g/L)). C_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=100 SRC="FIGDIR/small/537023v1_ufig2.gif" ALT="Figure 2"> View larger version (25K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10020forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f75707org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@72c474org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@bfce2a_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOB:C_FLOATNO Plots where conditions that neither totally validates an incidence of rQSSA nor sQSSA: Some v values are {propto} [ST] while some are not. Plot of all v values versus all [ST] values gave equation of linear regression (double reciprocal plot (drp)) such as: y = (0.6179 x + 0.1973) exp. (+3); the resulting Vmax is = 5.068mM/min and the KM is = 3.132g/L. The linear regression of 1/v versus 1/[ST] gave: y = (0.6682x - 0.0164) exp. (+3) for the plot covering 1/v1 to 1/v5. [Figure 2] stands for a "polynomial regression" of v versus [ST]; [Figure 2] stands for a linear regression of 1/v versus 1/[ST]. [ST]nvn-1 - [ST]n-1vn is = zero where the v values covers v7 to v14; [ST]nvn-1 - [ST]n-1vn is = zero where the v values covers v1 to v6. C_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=99 SRC="FIGDIR/small/537023v1_ufig3.gif" ALT="Figure 3"> View larger version (24K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7856f8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@95ceb1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@134ebb1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15de459_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOC:C_FLOATNO Plots where conditions that validate an incidence of either rQSSA or sQSSA may be the case: Such conditions are [ST] {approx} [ET]; [ET] < KM. The Vmax value and KM value expected from the regression equation (y = 0.4495 x + 0.2921) exp. (+3) from the plot of 1/v versus 1/[ST] are respectively 3.423 mM/min and 1.54 g/L. [Figure 3] stands for either linear or "polynomial" regression of v versus [ST]: Both plot show R2 that is = 0.9996; [Figure 3] stands for a linear regression (drp) of 1/v versus 1/[ST]. C_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=87 SRC="FIGDIR/small/537023v1_ufig4.gif" ALT="Figure 4"> View larger version (27K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13aa340org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b3c16eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1604419org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@116dc95_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOD:C_FLOATNO D: Plots where the condition that validate an incidence of sQSSA (or "Henri-Briggs-Haldane-Michaelis- Menten" (HBHMM) equation) may be the case: Such condition is that [ST] is >> [ET]. The Vmax value and KM value expected from the regression equation (y = 0.0449x + 0.0295) exp. (+6) from the plot of 1/v versus 1/[ST] are respectively 33.898 M/min and 1.522 g/L. [Figure 4] stands for a linear regression of 1/v versus 1/[ST]; [Figure 4] stands for a linear regression of v versus [ST]. C_FIG The summary presented in the graphical abstract is primarily intended to remind all and sundry, students and high-ranking scholars in the field, that the issue of QSSA must be reflected in the study of enzyme kinetics because the result of such a study has profound implications for scientific, engineering, and, in particular, medical applications. "To be as imposing as a titanic, does not mean that a titanic-like body is unsinkable". This implies that minor issues that are ignored can ultimately flaw a post-doctoral thesis by high-ranking researchers. Needless to give an example, but what needs to be taken home is that if an enzyme is very active with a given drug (and even food) to be activated, care should be taken to ensure that a low concentration of drug needs to be administered. In the management of diabetics, starchy foods containing resistant starches are recommended for the same reason.

biochemistry↗

Direct Estimate of the Specificity Constant: A Possibility or a Fluke? Pre-steady-state Substrate Concentrations and Enabling Mathematical Equations

BackgroundA high-ranking scientist has recently proposed the need for direct estimation of the specificity constant rather than by calculation after a separate determination of maximum velocity and the Michaelis-Menten constant (KM). ObjectivesThe objectives of this study are to derive novel equations for the zero-arbitrary determination of pre-steady-state (PSS) concentration of the substrate suitable for PSS assays, direct estimation of specificity constant (SC) under a PSS scenario, saturating concentration [ST] of the substrate, and instantaneous initial rate (otherwise called the "burst phase-like" rate), including its corresponding [ST]0, and to quantitatively evaluate the derived equations so as to give credence to their robustness and applicability. MethodsThe study was experimental and theoretical. It is supported by the Bernfeld method of enzyme assay. ResultThe SC values from the two newest methods for the three different concentrations of the enzyme range between 2,197.546 and 11,101.74 L/g min in one of the methods and 2,185.649 and 13,860.014 L/g min in the other method. The sub-KM values of the SC for the three different concentrations of the enzyme range between 1304.368 and 7943 L/g min. The burst phase-like initial rate, v0, and corresponding [ST]0, respectively, range between 14.26 and 55.448 micro-mol./min and 0.171 and 3.752 g/L. ConclusionThe derivation of the equations for the direct calculations of SC in conditions that validate the reverse and standard quasi-steady-state approximations was a possibility; the SC values are higher at lower concentrations of the enzyme. The concept of SC is very different from catalytic efficiency. The total absence of any calculation is impossible. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=145 SRC="FIGDIR/small/536186v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (29K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18f14d0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9f7d1borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ce8c72org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@66d168_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG Graphical abstract figure for the direct estimate of the specificity constant For the purpose of this study, the legends, SUB (S), ENZ (E), and PRD represents substrate, enzyme and product respectively. Lower number density (red) of the enzyme molecules in Figure 1 showing > number density of the product (light green) for the same concentration of the substrate (darker blue) than in Figure 2 implies that the catalytic efficiency in Figure 1 is > the illustration in Figure 2. C_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=96 SRC="FIGDIR/small/536186v1_fig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (11K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3e1897org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c08481org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13b5677org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a9cb5e_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 1:C_FLOATNO Plot illustrating the non-Michaelian characteristics of initial rates which is directly proportional to the sub-Michaelis-Menten constant concentration of the substrate where the concentrations of the enzyme are 0.0002 g/L ([Figure 1]) and 0.0005 g/L ([Figure 1]). The SC for 0.0005 g/L is = 7223.84 L/g. min; SC for 0.0002 g/L is = 7943 L/g min. C_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=139 SRC="FIGDIR/small/536186v1_fig2.gif" ALT="Figure 2"> View larger version (11K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@166c635org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5eec5aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ef08e6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@316124_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 2:C_FLOATNO Plot illustrating the non-Michaelian characteristics of initial rates which is directly proportional to the sub-Michaelis-Menten constant concentration of the substrate where the concentration of the enzyme is 0.002 g/L. The SC value is 1304.368 L/g min. C_FIG

biochemistry↗