bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Uccelli, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Uccelli, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Neural mechanisms for visuomotor co-regulation in social synchronization

During social activities, people coordinate their movements by exchanging visuomotor information. Interpersonal coordination occurs from two complementary processes entailing voluntary (planned) and spontaneous (emergent) synchronization, of which neurofunctional underpinnings are unknown. We investigated the brain correlates of these two synchronization processes during an fMRI finger-tapping task. Dyads formed by IN and OUT scanner participants were instructed to reproduce a target tempo and concurrently try to synchronize to (Joint Action, JA) or resist synchronization with (Non-interactive, NI) the partners tapping, whose hand was always visible to the IN participant. Faster, slower, or equal tempi were used to induce within-dyad co-regulation. Results revealed the emergence of tempo contagion: participants tapped faster in response to the partners faster taps and vice versa for slower taps. The magnitude of such an interpersonal contagion effect was similar across conditions but associated with the activity of different neural structures. Tempo contagion correlated positively with lateral occipitotemporal cortex (LOTc) activations in the JA condition but negatively with cerebellar activations in the NI condition. This suggests visuomotor information is exploited in opposite ways depending on the task instructions: the LOTc promotes co-regulation to achieve synchronization in JA, whereas the cerebellum prevents tempo contagion to preserve individual stability in NI. This latter result is supported by a negative functional connectivity between the cerebellum and LOTc. These findings have implications for understating the interplay between planned and emergent synchronization during motor interactions.

neuroscience↗

Perception - action dissociations depend on factors that affect multisensory processing

Behavioral perception-action dissociations are widely used to test models of high-level vision, but debates concerning their interpretation have underestimated the role of multisensory mechanisms in such tests. Sensorimotor tasks engage multisensory processing in fundamentally different ways in comparison to perceptual tasks, and these differences can modulate the effects of illusion in specific ways in accord with the features of the experimental task. To test this idea, we compared perception and action using a well-understood size-contrast effect, the Uznadze illusion, and manipulated both unimodal and crossmodal stimulation as well as conditions that are known to favor or hinder multisensory integration. Results demonstrate that varying such conditions can cause a visual task to be affected by the illusion, or remain fully unaffected, whereas a visuomotor task can be affected by the illusion, remain immune from the illusion, or, unexpectedly, even show a robust reverse effect. Thus, similar or dissociable effects on perception and action can be observed depending on factors that are known to affect multisensory processing.These findings provide a novel perspective on a long standing debate in behavioral cognitive neuroscience.

neuroscience↗